Home
Zaam poison in the General Amnesty Law
6/20/2015
Independence of the judiciary and respect for the law, the most important elements of democratic systems in the world. We did not read or hear a story someday, that Japan, Britain or France or other discreet democratic systems in the world, the governments issue a general amnesty for criminals, in those countries. But in the new Iraq, who knew the identity of the constitution system of government, as a democratic and pluralistic system, saw a wrong committed by the experience of Mr. Nouri al-Maliki, when his government approved in the first term (2010-2014),
a general amnesty law for criminals, as a step to achieve the sincerity of Mr. al-Maliki, in Appl political agreements, with the other parties involved in the political process. And under that law, the release of hardened criminals terrorists. And after a short period of time, Mr. al-Maliki said, that many of the terrorists, criminals, who were arrested later, they were who included the Amnesty Act of 2008.
So experience has shown in practice and recognition of the former Iraqi prime minister, that the terrorists who were released under a general amnesty law in 2008, returned to practice terrorism against innocent Iraqi citizens crimes. And now the oldest of Mr. Haider al-Abadi, to repeat the wrong experience, has been practically exercise by the government that preceded it.
The issue of amnesty, it is only in dictatorships, with a market share of power head, all the powers, under control, there is no law, and not constrained by the Constitution. Does our democratic system take approaching the limits of the dictatorial regime?
There are very important points, you should know the harm to the public interest, when the adoption of the amnesty law, which lifted the Council of Ministers to the House of Representatives, on June 16, 2015, for approval. And certainly, the House of Representatives will amend the paragraphs of this law, to be more service and benefit to the terrorists, criminals. And points are:
1. When the elected representatives of the Iraqi people, through the ballot box, it is the duty of Julhm to do to achieve their interests. Will the adoption of the amnesty law, serve the interests of the Iraqi people, or is it intersects with it?
2. From the sons of the Iraqi people, the Iraqi government authorized to forfeit his right?
3. Who was dear to him in terrorist operation, you went to Mr. Abadi, or any other government entity, and gave a written application, in which a waiver of the right of comeuppance, from a criminal who Fjah Bazizh?
4. From the jurisprudence, not any party may dispose of the rights of the other hand, what the person concerned did not authorize exclusively so. And therefore the issuance of the amnesty law, which contrary to the teachings of the Islamic religion. And the Iraqi Constitution does not permit the intersection of law, with Islamic sharia law. It has stated in Part I, Article (2) First of all, of the Iraqi Constitution as follows:
A. (No law may be enacted that contradicts the established provisions of Islam.) (Finished).
C. (No law may be enacted that contradicts the rights and basic freedoms outlined in this constitution.) (Finished).
Will the adoption of the amnesty law, is not in vain and Tafrita, in the rights of citizens?
5. Do you know signatories of the General Amnesty Law, they will present our children working in the security services and investigative and judicial, to many risks, as a result of their duties, beginning with the arrest of criminals operations, and until they arrive to the courts?
6. Do you know the extent and frustration and psychological refraction, which will be felt by, each of the files dealing with terrorists and criminals?
7. In all the world's democracies, where governments seek to enact laws that protect citizens, and safeguard the rights of any breakthrough, but in the new Iraq government is seeking to protect terrorists, and counterfeiters and embezzlers and corrupt, what logic explains this trend Iraqi our government, and the Iraqi people live a state of war and face-to-face, with the conspirators and the rebels on the system and the law?
8. and teaches you the signatories of the General Amnesty Law, they Ptoukaam on this law, they will kill the rest of the sincerity and good citizenship element, within the entity every man Iraqi jealous, where will feel Iraqi good man, that there is no value to the law, and not the existence of the right, and no trace of justice in this miserable society?
I say:
If the adoption of the amnesty law, the product of a political process devoid of true values, and failed to address the requirements of the people, Velinhi Iraqi street to defend their rights, instead of delegating affairs to the people, are not worthy to bear the responsibility and honesty. And God of the intent behind.
The article expresses the opinion of the author and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the most important news
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
6/20/2015
Independence of the judiciary and respect for the law, the most important elements of democratic systems in the world. We did not read or hear a story someday, that Japan, Britain or France or other discreet democratic systems in the world, the governments issue a general amnesty for criminals, in those countries. But in the new Iraq, who knew the identity of the constitution system of government, as a democratic and pluralistic system, saw a wrong committed by the experience of Mr. Nouri al-Maliki, when his government approved in the first term (2010-2014),
a general amnesty law for criminals, as a step to achieve the sincerity of Mr. al-Maliki, in Appl political agreements, with the other parties involved in the political process. And under that law, the release of hardened criminals terrorists. And after a short period of time, Mr. al-Maliki said, that many of the terrorists, criminals, who were arrested later, they were who included the Amnesty Act of 2008.
So experience has shown in practice and recognition of the former Iraqi prime minister, that the terrorists who were released under a general amnesty law in 2008, returned to practice terrorism against innocent Iraqi citizens crimes. And now the oldest of Mr. Haider al-Abadi, to repeat the wrong experience, has been practically exercise by the government that preceded it.
The issue of amnesty, it is only in dictatorships, with a market share of power head, all the powers, under control, there is no law, and not constrained by the Constitution. Does our democratic system take approaching the limits of the dictatorial regime?
There are very important points, you should know the harm to the public interest, when the adoption of the amnesty law, which lifted the Council of Ministers to the House of Representatives, on June 16, 2015, for approval. And certainly, the House of Representatives will amend the paragraphs of this law, to be more service and benefit to the terrorists, criminals. And points are:
1. When the elected representatives of the Iraqi people, through the ballot box, it is the duty of Julhm to do to achieve their interests. Will the adoption of the amnesty law, serve the interests of the Iraqi people, or is it intersects with it?
2. From the sons of the Iraqi people, the Iraqi government authorized to forfeit his right?
3. Who was dear to him in terrorist operation, you went to Mr. Abadi, or any other government entity, and gave a written application, in which a waiver of the right of comeuppance, from a criminal who Fjah Bazizh?
4. From the jurisprudence, not any party may dispose of the rights of the other hand, what the person concerned did not authorize exclusively so. And therefore the issuance of the amnesty law, which contrary to the teachings of the Islamic religion. And the Iraqi Constitution does not permit the intersection of law, with Islamic sharia law. It has stated in Part I, Article (2) First of all, of the Iraqi Constitution as follows:
A. (No law may be enacted that contradicts the established provisions of Islam.) (Finished).
C. (No law may be enacted that contradicts the rights and basic freedoms outlined in this constitution.) (Finished).
Will the adoption of the amnesty law, is not in vain and Tafrita, in the rights of citizens?
5. Do you know signatories of the General Amnesty Law, they will present our children working in the security services and investigative and judicial, to many risks, as a result of their duties, beginning with the arrest of criminals operations, and until they arrive to the courts?
6. Do you know the extent and frustration and psychological refraction, which will be felt by, each of the files dealing with terrorists and criminals?
7. In all the world's democracies, where governments seek to enact laws that protect citizens, and safeguard the rights of any breakthrough, but in the new Iraq government is seeking to protect terrorists, and counterfeiters and embezzlers and corrupt, what logic explains this trend Iraqi our government, and the Iraqi people live a state of war and face-to-face, with the conspirators and the rebels on the system and the law?
8. and teaches you the signatories of the General Amnesty Law, they Ptoukaam on this law, they will kill the rest of the sincerity and good citizenship element, within the entity every man Iraqi jealous, where will feel Iraqi good man, that there is no value to the law, and not the existence of the right, and no trace of justice in this miserable society?
I say:
If the adoption of the amnesty law, the product of a political process devoid of true values, and failed to address the requirements of the people, Velinhi Iraqi street to defend their rights, instead of delegating affairs to the people, are not worthy to bear the responsibility and honesty. And God of the intent behind.
The article expresses the opinion of the author and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the most important news
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
