Home
No, my (Beckman)
03/12/2011
D. Jassim Hussein Khalidi
Since 2003 and now Iraqis pay the price of liberty and freedom from control of police, which shackled slaves and the country for more than thirty-five years, as well as the creative chaos that the Americans want from pushing the country has and the resulting congestion sectarian not Ntaav him completely; as some are still pours oil on the fire on the occasion and without occasion, and not the latest incident Nukhayb.
I would say that Iraq pay for the occupation dearly and it is not fair to ask him one to pay for the occupation since 2003 and now, this talk is to launch what the words of Rep. U.S. (Beckman) according to what reported by local radio, which demanded the Iraqi government to pay compensation occupation up to (800) billion and rewarding pay compensation to the dead and wounded Americans, which in practice means that the Iraqis will keep paying their labor and tired of the daily as well as what comes to them from oil imports until after 2020, which is Idaoely surprise and suspicion.
The surprise was not due to Pacman, but a statement to the silence in parliament and government so calls to try to Tstcherq prospects for passage of laws in the U.S. Congress .. Therefore, we find it is true that correspond to this call a deafening silence; even required to leave the parliamentarians their differences and unite under a tent to claim damages rewarding for the destruction of the long Iraq's institutions, history and heritage of civilization and can not be one to seek an excuse for the occupation forces and opens the doors of the Iraqi Museum of thieves and merchants of crisis which wreaked havoc with this history beyond corruption can not be compensated for any price.
It must be their calls resonate at many fair-minded people inside and outside Iraq, and perhaps even when the American public itself because they call a fair and consistent with international standards and conventions, humanitarian and give vision to the Iraqis that their representatives in Parliament and even government officials who came out of the coat of Parliament were keen to Iraqi money The legacy of Iraq and are keen to apply the electoral programs that have often been labeled patriotism.
Yes, that regime change was a requirement masses, and so was hoping for Iraq, who tried to cross the attempts culminated in the uprising Alcabanih that could not be successful without the will of the regional and stood by the executioner at the expense of the victim and gave the green light for him to eliminate it, and the apology the current U.S. ambassador in Iraq, but evidence of such negligence; therefore Doralomrikan was not alone, and behind the overthrow of the system; as combined with the urge awaiting the breeze of freedom with passion and love, which is easy to collapse and escape at the time was not the Americans themselves, they expect, a similar scenario for 1991, but with a difference the sole Tgiralaradh U.S. that wanted to get rid of the system this time.
The invitation (Pacman) is rejected out of hand, if there was a loss of demand from the war and occupation, it is Iraq that pay the price many times.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
03/12/2011
D. Jassim Hussein Khalidi
Since 2003 and now Iraqis pay the price of liberty and freedom from control of police, which shackled slaves and the country for more than thirty-five years, as well as the creative chaos that the Americans want from pushing the country has and the resulting congestion sectarian not Ntaav him completely; as some are still pours oil on the fire on the occasion and without occasion, and not the latest incident Nukhayb.
I would say that Iraq pay for the occupation dearly and it is not fair to ask him one to pay for the occupation since 2003 and now, this talk is to launch what the words of Rep. U.S. (Beckman) according to what reported by local radio, which demanded the Iraqi government to pay compensation occupation up to (800) billion and rewarding pay compensation to the dead and wounded Americans, which in practice means that the Iraqis will keep paying their labor and tired of the daily as well as what comes to them from oil imports until after 2020, which is Idaoely surprise and suspicion.
The surprise was not due to Pacman, but a statement to the silence in parliament and government so calls to try to Tstcherq prospects for passage of laws in the U.S. Congress .. Therefore, we find it is true that correspond to this call a deafening silence; even required to leave the parliamentarians their differences and unite under a tent to claim damages rewarding for the destruction of the long Iraq's institutions, history and heritage of civilization and can not be one to seek an excuse for the occupation forces and opens the doors of the Iraqi Museum of thieves and merchants of crisis which wreaked havoc with this history beyond corruption can not be compensated for any price.
It must be their calls resonate at many fair-minded people inside and outside Iraq, and perhaps even when the American public itself because they call a fair and consistent with international standards and conventions, humanitarian and give vision to the Iraqis that their representatives in Parliament and even government officials who came out of the coat of Parliament were keen to Iraqi money The legacy of Iraq and are keen to apply the electoral programs that have often been labeled patriotism.
Yes, that regime change was a requirement masses, and so was hoping for Iraq, who tried to cross the attempts culminated in the uprising Alcabanih that could not be successful without the will of the regional and stood by the executioner at the expense of the victim and gave the green light for him to eliminate it, and the apology the current U.S. ambassador in Iraq, but evidence of such negligence; therefore Doralomrikan was not alone, and behind the overthrow of the system; as combined with the urge awaiting the breeze of freedom with passion and love, which is easy to collapse and escape at the time was not the Americans themselves, they expect, a similar scenario for 1991, but with a difference the sole Tgiralaradh U.S. that wanted to get rid of the system this time.
The invitation (Pacman) is rejected out of hand, if there was a loss of demand from the war and occupation, it is Iraq that pay the price many times.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
