Home
12.10.2011 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add comments - Baghdad / term - particularly now that the U.S. withdrawal date is calculated in days, generated by some political forces, many questions, most notably; the quality of relations after the total withdrawal of combat troops, according to the agreement that concluded between the two sides in 2008 and what about the strategic relations and agreed to what extent will benefit the Iraqi side of this agreement? Is America completed the job of fighting? Is Iraq today free from terrorist groups and organized gangs and outlaws? Or is it just promises, launched by the U.S. president during his election campaign and it became necessary to be met by whatever will attest, Iraq, and the suspicions of political fact remains all expectations and the options open to everyone, and perhaps divergent views between the members and observers were poured on their outlook and their determination to some interests and Check the change in the political map over the past nine years, beginning not know for sure whether America will withdraw from Iraq or not? If we pulled out one form or another, how will the number of remaining for the purposes of training and rehabilitation? What are the potential surprises that may precede the date of withdrawal as was described by officials? . It is up to his time, but the parties that make up the partnership government has swung about withdrawal or not and unambiguous and controlled by the nature of some relationships with the U.S. side, and the amount of the impact of the regional countries. The National Alliance, a block mostly settled their positions on the withdrawal and to maintain what is necessary and commensurate with the tasks of training and rehabilitation, and few of them are still positions volatile controlled the causes and other pressures or interests, whether the departure of U.S. forces or in the survival of part of it, for example; The National Coalition representing the mass of Liberals was his position from the beginning, rejecting for the survival of any power under any name. The MP said Jawad Alshahyla told (long) "The exit of U.S. troops from Iraq as a victory for the resistance which threatened the Muqtada al-Sadr," he continued, "We do not want to stay any U.S. troops under any name that the Iraq country with its weight in terms of the military system does not wait for help from any state, "The state law, the matter may be similar somewhat, as some lawmakers threw the ball in the court of the government declaring that the commander of the armed forces is the only of the estimated need for Iraq troops or trainers. The MP said Kamal Saadi for a coalition of state law in a statement (long) "Both sides are committed to the implementation of the Convention and there will be a strategic agreement may be implemented after 2011," he continued, saying "According to my knowledge about the Convention, there is clear cooperation with the American side in all areas is the most important the military, which makes us believe that the United States has not given up on Iraq, as some people imagine they are obliged to implement the strategic agreement, which provides training and arming the military system with the latest sophisticated weapons and under the direct supervision of the United States, and the government had previously announced that the negotiations are about good and there are no problems worth mentioning. " Perhaps the uncertainty and duplication of positions can Tachireha in the position of the Iraqi List, most of their masses want troops to stay, especially since the maneuvers and clear in the statements and communications codes list, which is not clear in dealing with the defining issue of this magnitude, a minority of them settled position with the withdrawal , white the Iraqi example, it has been refused its troops to stay, saying that Iraq is not binding in cooperation with the U.S. after 2011 and many of the advanced countries in the military side as possible to contract with the government, and the other hand the Iraqi List, for fear of lack of clarity of the Convention expressing fear, if there were secret items have not been announced by the government. The MP said Hamid al-Mutlaq, the Iraqi List led by Iyad Allawi, we read the American Convention - Iraq and, if applied to the items accepted will be our position, positive, and if there are secret items will we have another position, and the next few days will show us how the credibility of the American side because people are not likely the survival of those forces on its territory, as MP Mahmoud Othman told (long) "The United States failed in Iraq and the whole what has been achieved in past years, still needs to political awareness, especially that the parties suffer a lack of confidence, and the last message sent by terrorists to blow up Parliament was clear and indicates that they are still able to launch attacks at any place, even if he was married, "Osman said," At this stage, if the application of the Convention in full The Americans handed over Iraq to Iran and will be the last is one of the control to draw domestic and foreign policy, especially the Iranians are on the verge of losing a strategic ally, such as Syria, and expected to raise new crises between the political parties that the political process is still fragile and there is no unified position on the simplest things and get out of combat troops is normal, "while reports indicate U.S. recently published in the network Kaontrbenj and in the words of Michael Knights, chief security and military at the Institute of Washington that the U.S. presence will continue to maintain some interests that the United States intends to be eager for, the Report and in spite of the pledges and agreements concluded that the reality is more complex, and that the numbers of U.S. military personnel will remain in Baghdad to officially and legally due to the presence of UNMIK and diplomats at the U.S. Embassy and is clear in item 3927 of section 22 of the U.S. law and this presence is legal and an estimated 16,000 thousand divided the 14,000 individual, they will be civilians, including 4,000 to 5,000 task will be to combat and protect the mission, despite that Baghdad had refused military trainers who work outside the authority of the Chief of Mission, the efforts of the security assistance will be illustrated as follows - Office of Security Cooperation - Iraq (OSC-I) and will include This office temporarily 157 individuals belonging to the Ministry of Defense and 763 work in teams special assistance and support staff. The Office's mission is to "advise, train, assist and equip" Iraqi security forces. It will focus on members of the Pentagon's control of Iraqi leaders and building institutional capacity in the ministries and the security management Alajtlab broad military equipment under the umbrella of the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program, as well as the transfer of excess U.S. military equipment to Iraq. The teams special assistance will support the Defense Contract Iraqi individual and can be for a number of these teams would increase if brought Iraq, more American weapons in the future, as well as reports for military commanders in Iraq, which emphasizes the need for Iraq to more troops in disputed areas and estimated at about 4000 - 6,000 soldiers, Prime Minister has presented the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces Nouri al-Maliki last August the technical reports of military experts at a meeting of leaders of the blocks. The first report addressed the readiness of Iraqi forces, at three levels, I; internal security, and II; border protection, and III; from the armed forces and their readiness to confront foreign aggression. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
