Home
Why after the departure of America from Iraq?
12/22/2011 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add Comment - opinion on who should want to know how it began the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq to study the events that finally carefully designed in both Washington and Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The war is over, this is what was announced by U.S. President Barack Obama over and over again. and U.S. forces will leave behind an Iraq that «a solid, stable and parliament». The greatest fighting force in the world leave Iraq raised the head. This is what the man who had called the Iraq war folly. This was a war that lasted nine years and joined the list of the worst mistakes the military throughout history, including a raid Dieppe and the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the German invasion of the Soviet Union and Vietnam, from the viewpoint of the U.S. president is moving towards the end of a successful and honorable. and even in the election campaign begins in full force, the gap created between the words that was said in Fort Bragg, and one day in the life of Iraq was not overcome possible. The recent relatively calm, as it witnessed the explosion of two car bombs in Tal Afar, killing three people and wounding 35 others, signed the bombings and firing incidents fire in Kirkuk, Mosul and Baghdad. Is the war ended?. Or Take for example the decision to the Board of Diyala province to declare secession from the central government. or take the answer made by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, finally, when asked to describe how he sees himself, as he felt the same from the perspective of doctrine, which belongs to him first, and an Iraqi second place, third place and the Arab world, and a member of the Dawa Party, the fourth place. What is the probability that a nation-state, when the Prime Minister puts religious identity over national identity? Can any of the foregoing be considered as a solid or stable or parliamentary? With regard to stealing Obama's clothing Republicans in his address to the paratroopers at Fort Bragg, there may be little doubt in that. The issue of national security, with a strong approach in relation to foreign policy, it is their specialty. However, they were extracted by a Democratic president who ordered the increase in the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Navy SEAL team was sent to kill Osama bin Laden, and the failure to close Guantanamo, which now fulfill his pledge to return all American troops home. The commander of the army of the strongest in the world is a global leader as well, and should the American president to address the Middle East as well. For to this people, and specifically to U.S. allies in the region, the day when the last American soldier to cross the desert at the end of the current year will be already «exceptional event», but not this one which may prepare for the recognition by the President faces re-election. you will be Iraq, which President Obama would leave his successor a strategic ally of the United States? Not quite. Fsharika Almstqublaan Iraq, Iran and Turkey. The United States comes in third place, far in the level. did not result in the war to silence radical forums, which formed the center of armed action in Iraq .. Islamists and regained full activity again. The elements of matter «Awakening» or «Sons of Iraq», who played a key role in turning the tide against al Qaeda, to leave Iraq, those affected by the position of the Iraqi prime minister, who did his best to suppress them. And future generations will carry the scars of this grand folly. The struggle for the fate of the Arab territories to achieve a victory, but not at the hands of America. Opening «The Guardian» British
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
