Home
July 10, 2011
Lawsuits to obtain the compensation from the U.S. side
International law firm estimated at 25 trillion dollars
Falluji and calls for the inclusion in any future agreement
Moving political figures and law firms into an international litigation to obtain the financial compensation from the U.S. side by the damage done to the Iraqi people from U.S. forces. This comes at a time estimated by the international law firm based in the United States Maysthakh Iraq from the compensation from the U.S. side at $20 to to 25 trillion dollars.
The MP said the former Saddam Hussein's rule (which is still at one of the national campaign to demand compensation from the U.S. side): The leaders of political blocs on the file of interest in compensation, and to refrain from passing any new agreement with the United States until the research in this file."
He Falluji the "morning": that this compensation is an internationally guaranteed right of Iraq ..
I think the time is right to listen to the American side of the political and popular demands.
It is not a personal right of any negligence or block them (compensation)."
He met more than 100 Iraqi political figure in Amman recently, to discuss the mechanism required the United States and allied countries to pay reparations to the Iraqi people because of the occupation.
Falluji added: "The law firm based in the United States dispatched two lawyers amount of compensation payable to the Iraqi people by 20 to 25 trillion dollars," pointing out that the company has shown its willingness to file a lawsuit against the American side, but he also said: that the real guarantee for obtaining the compensation is a recognition of the Americans, compensation and include This recognition of any new agreement between the two countries with the formation of a joint committee."
Falluji also stressed that "if this is not done Fsnljo to file a complaint, particularly claims that the settlement agreement on the settlement of claims against the Americans or the Iraqis do not mean the right of states to bring down the Iraqi people to claim compensation."
The head of the Commission on Human Rights in the House of Representatives, said Salim al: "The parliamentarians are seeking to adopt a resolution needed to move towards this subject, as the body having jurisdiction, the stakeholders in order to claim the rights of Iraqis and their compensation."
And saw Jubouri that "there is reluctance on the part of the Government in this regard, it is not included previous agreements with the United States refers to this meaning," alluding to "the existence of laws to compensate for the Iraqis, including the law on compensation for those affected by military operations and terrorist, but who compensates the the Iraqi government, and the compensation by the foreign forces, there are no agreements about it."
For his part, chairman of the Bar of Iraqi Mohammed Faisal, "the right of Iraqis affected by U.S. military operations to sue the U.S. government, and to claim damages before the Iraqi courts and international, because what was done by these forces of business and crimes during the invasion of Iraq was out of the international will and has no international legitimacy." .
Also considered the legal expert Tareq Harb, the "Convention on the settlement of claims with Washington has not lost the right of Iraqi reparations," explaining that "the door of the claim is still open to Iraqis, provided that the proceedings are held in U.S. courts."
In the meantime, according to British newspaper The Guardian that the ruling by the European Court in Strasbourg, which confirms that Britain, as the occupying power in Iraq, have a responsibility to carry failing to achieve adequate in the killing of Iraqi civilians, could open the door to lawsuits affect British Ministry of Defence.
The newspaper said yesterday that "the decision of the Strasbourg Court would also enhance the pressure to open new investigations in the behavior of British troops in Basra and around at some point after the invasion in 2003." But the most important in what was concluded by the Guardian, said the court's decision expands the scope of responsibilities to outside British territory, and outside the European territory, which will have major implications on the military operations around the world.
The newspaper said that "the issue considered by the court filed by law firm in Premngham in Britain, on behalf of Iraqis said their relatives were killed or raped, disappeared or tortured at the hands of British soldiers between 2003 and 2006."
The Court held that "Britain to the United States, had borne the responsibility to exercise powers normally exercised by a sovereign government."
The court noted in its resolution that Britain bore the specific authority and responsibility for security in southeastern Iraq.
The Court concluded by saying that he was "considering that these civilians had been subjected to these crimes or violations during the period that Britain was where these responsibilities, it was incumbent on them to do an investigation into the deaths."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Lawsuits to obtain the compensation from the U.S. side
International law firm estimated at 25 trillion dollars
Falluji and calls for the inclusion in any future agreement
Moving political figures and law firms into an international litigation to obtain the financial compensation from the U.S. side by the damage done to the Iraqi people from U.S. forces. This comes at a time estimated by the international law firm based in the United States Maysthakh Iraq from the compensation from the U.S. side at $20 to to 25 trillion dollars.
The MP said the former Saddam Hussein's rule (which is still at one of the national campaign to demand compensation from the U.S. side): The leaders of political blocs on the file of interest in compensation, and to refrain from passing any new agreement with the United States until the research in this file."
He Falluji the "morning": that this compensation is an internationally guaranteed right of Iraq ..
I think the time is right to listen to the American side of the political and popular demands.
It is not a personal right of any negligence or block them (compensation)."
He met more than 100 Iraqi political figure in Amman recently, to discuss the mechanism required the United States and allied countries to pay reparations to the Iraqi people because of the occupation.
Falluji added: "The law firm based in the United States dispatched two lawyers amount of compensation payable to the Iraqi people by 20 to 25 trillion dollars," pointing out that the company has shown its willingness to file a lawsuit against the American side, but he also said: that the real guarantee for obtaining the compensation is a recognition of the Americans, compensation and include This recognition of any new agreement between the two countries with the formation of a joint committee."
Falluji also stressed that "if this is not done Fsnljo to file a complaint, particularly claims that the settlement agreement on the settlement of claims against the Americans or the Iraqis do not mean the right of states to bring down the Iraqi people to claim compensation."
The head of the Commission on Human Rights in the House of Representatives, said Salim al: "The parliamentarians are seeking to adopt a resolution needed to move towards this subject, as the body having jurisdiction, the stakeholders in order to claim the rights of Iraqis and their compensation."
And saw Jubouri that "there is reluctance on the part of the Government in this regard, it is not included previous agreements with the United States refers to this meaning," alluding to "the existence of laws to compensate for the Iraqis, including the law on compensation for those affected by military operations and terrorist, but who compensates the the Iraqi government, and the compensation by the foreign forces, there are no agreements about it."
For his part, chairman of the Bar of Iraqi Mohammed Faisal, "the right of Iraqis affected by U.S. military operations to sue the U.S. government, and to claim damages before the Iraqi courts and international, because what was done by these forces of business and crimes during the invasion of Iraq was out of the international will and has no international legitimacy." .
Also considered the legal expert Tareq Harb, the "Convention on the settlement of claims with Washington has not lost the right of Iraqi reparations," explaining that "the door of the claim is still open to Iraqis, provided that the proceedings are held in U.S. courts."
In the meantime, according to British newspaper The Guardian that the ruling by the European Court in Strasbourg, which confirms that Britain, as the occupying power in Iraq, have a responsibility to carry failing to achieve adequate in the killing of Iraqi civilians, could open the door to lawsuits affect British Ministry of Defence.
The newspaper said yesterday that "the decision of the Strasbourg Court would also enhance the pressure to open new investigations in the behavior of British troops in Basra and around at some point after the invasion in 2003." But the most important in what was concluded by the Guardian, said the court's decision expands the scope of responsibilities to outside British territory, and outside the European territory, which will have major implications on the military operations around the world.
The newspaper said that "the issue considered by the court filed by law firm in Premngham in Britain, on behalf of Iraqis said their relatives were killed or raped, disappeared or tortured at the hands of British soldiers between 2003 and 2006."
The Court held that "Britain to the United States, had borne the responsibility to exercise powers normally exercised by a sovereign government."
The court noted in its resolution that Britain bore the specific authority and responsibility for security in southeastern Iraq.
The Court concluded by saying that he was "considering that these civilians had been subjected to these crimes or violations during the period that Britain was where these responsibilities, it was incumbent on them to do an investigation into the deaths."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
