BAGHDAD – babysit – confirmed member of a coalition of state law to give Abbas al-Bayati, the Council of the authority of the strategic policy violates the Constitution.
Bayati said in a statement to the news agency public opinion (and babysit) on Saturday: “The board should be the national advisory council and a coordinating council is not a power snatch authorities of constitutional institutions, which makes it contrary to the Constitution.”
For his part, member of the National Alliance MP Mohammed Chihod The National Council of the Supreme policies strategy will see the light and are enacted in the event he became an advisory board, stressing that the Iraqi insistence on clinging to its position by giving him executive powers, this will prevent the legislation. “
Chihod said in a statement to news agency public opinion (and babysit) on Saturday: “The agreement provided for the Erbil enactment of the National Council and shall have advisory powers only, nothing more.”
Adding: “The Iraqi demands to grant executive powers of this Council and this can not be at all because the Board was unconstitutional and inconsistent with the powers of the three presidencies.”
Bayati said in a statement to the news agency public opinion (and babysit) on Saturday: “The board should be the national advisory council and a coordinating council is not a power snatch authorities of constitutional institutions, which makes it contrary to the Constitution.”
For his part, member of the National Alliance MP Mohammed Chihod The National Council of the Supreme policies strategy will see the light and are enacted in the event he became an advisory board, stressing that the Iraqi insistence on clinging to its position by giving him executive powers, this will prevent the legislation. “
Chihod said in a statement to news agency public opinion (and babysit) on Saturday: “The agreement provided for the Erbil enactment of the National Council and shall have advisory powers only, nothing more.”
Adding: “The Iraqi demands to grant executive powers of this Council and this can not be at all because the Board was unconstitutional and inconsistent with the powers of the three presidencies.”