Home
To Atafrhawwa innocently Shabibi
Friday December 26, 2014
State can not be adopted unless there is judicial institution discreet discreet military establishment and the absence of any institution of the state institutions become weak and failed and can not feel relieved that the citizen of the State of Aisodha honest and military law, which treats people are equal
First judiciary and the military mission is to preserve the application of judicial decisions; impartial judiciary need tools to help him perform his mission fully and that any defect in the tools reflect negatively on the performance of his duties noble
We as citizens have the right to question the Elimination because our destiny and our respect to him with his hand so it is right that we look out and follow his steps and decisions and to Anjamlh or applaud his steps when they are in our favor and condemn them if Atsb Personal our interests
We do not want the judiciary to be a sectarian judged positively to our community and to other error range; Anridh to be positive with our comrades and negatively with our competitors; Aaradh to be judged of my innocence that I did not innocent
Farah many Iraqis innocently Shabibi and Mohammed Allawi and the appearance of the benefit of Iraqis did not know what are the grounds relied upon by the judiciary and the provisions of the patent issued against these characters?
I'm afraid that these decisions be made to satisfy the majority of citizens who demanded the release away from the facts and evidence which are found guilty or innocent
Recent decisions by the Iraqi judiciary indicate two things
I: The elimination era Maliki was politicized and biased state-Maliki and this requires a review of all decisions taken under the previous government
II: The Iraqi judiciary sided Abadi to assemble the parties and not to provoke a crisis again and stay away from the previous policy pursued by the previous government headed by al-Maliki Policy
In both cases, we did not spend in front insists on defending himself and his decisions and move from policy to another and from one to the conviction of the patent as a result of changing governments and policies
Shabibi patent is supposed to "inflame" the Iraqi public opinion and there should be demonstrations demanding the elimination inform the public about the circumstances of the legal issues and what are the foundations on which walked and followed by the judiciary and judges
The applause for this decision today and tomorrow to appeal the latest ruling puts us far from the front of the foundations of law and the close of the public mood decisions
Who rejoiced innocence decisions forgetting that the guilty verdicts and decisions of the patent issued from the same judges
In both cases, you should call for the elimination of clean loyal to any authority, whether past or present.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
--
Friday December 26, 2014
State can not be adopted unless there is judicial institution discreet discreet military establishment and the absence of any institution of the state institutions become weak and failed and can not feel relieved that the citizen of the State of Aisodha honest and military law, which treats people are equal
First judiciary and the military mission is to preserve the application of judicial decisions; impartial judiciary need tools to help him perform his mission fully and that any defect in the tools reflect negatively on the performance of his duties noble
We as citizens have the right to question the Elimination because our destiny and our respect to him with his hand so it is right that we look out and follow his steps and decisions and to Anjamlh or applaud his steps when they are in our favor and condemn them if Atsb Personal our interests
We do not want the judiciary to be a sectarian judged positively to our community and to other error range; Anridh to be positive with our comrades and negatively with our competitors; Aaradh to be judged of my innocence that I did not innocent
Farah many Iraqis innocently Shabibi and Mohammed Allawi and the appearance of the benefit of Iraqis did not know what are the grounds relied upon by the judiciary and the provisions of the patent issued against these characters?
I'm afraid that these decisions be made to satisfy the majority of citizens who demanded the release away from the facts and evidence which are found guilty or innocent
Recent decisions by the Iraqi judiciary indicate two things
I: The elimination era Maliki was politicized and biased state-Maliki and this requires a review of all decisions taken under the previous government
II: The Iraqi judiciary sided Abadi to assemble the parties and not to provoke a crisis again and stay away from the previous policy pursued by the previous government headed by al-Maliki Policy
In both cases, we did not spend in front insists on defending himself and his decisions and move from policy to another and from one to the conviction of the patent as a result of changing governments and policies
Shabibi patent is supposed to "inflame" the Iraqi public opinion and there should be demonstrations demanding the elimination inform the public about the circumstances of the legal issues and what are the foundations on which walked and followed by the judiciary and judges
The applause for this decision today and tomorrow to appeal the latest ruling puts us far from the front of the foundations of law and the close of the public mood decisions
Who rejoiced innocence decisions forgetting that the guilty verdicts and decisions of the patent issued from the same judges
In both cases, you should call for the elimination of clean loyal to any authority, whether past or present.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
--
