Home
Parliament resumes debate about the independence of the Federal Court and the subordination of the Judicial Council
22/03/2015
Long-Presse / Baghdad
Team of refusing to integrate the "Federal Court" the Supreme Council is supposed to eliminate and make their presidency, however, one person, that the first rule on the administrative task between the capital and the provinces political conflicts, and can not be inferior to the Judicial Council for that to be the separation of the two institutions. As they talk about the abuse of power, which may occur if accumulated, however, one person is headed by the two institutions as stated in the draft of the new law, which was presented to Parliament recently, abruptly after he read the old draft of a first reading.
Conversely pro team to make the Federal Court to defend a tool of the Judicial Council that the tools that lead to "protect them from the quota system" in the event turned out to be an independent board, and the pressure of the expenses that would result from the presence of another president independent of the Council.
The opponents of Nuri al-Maliki in the previous parliament were able at the end of 2013 to pass a law, "the Supreme Judicial Council" and neglected the material used to say that the Federal Court is part of the Judicial Council shall nominate the Chairman and members of the tasks, Vvsaloa between the two institutions has led to the loss of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud office in the Judicial Council for a few months, which angered Maliki team then who boycotted the session before that challenged the law, which did not touch him parliament again until now.
Dual Power
He says a member of the Legal Committee of the House of Representatives Kadhim al-Shammari that "the political system in Iraq after 2003 tended to the British system in terms of dual power, she became the executive branch consists of my presidency of the Minister of the Republic, and the legislature of the House of Representatives and the Federal Council (not initiated yet), and according to this must to be a judicial council of the judiciary and the Federal Court. "
Confirms al-Shammari in the national coalition, led by Vice President Iyad Allawi's "long" that the Legal Committee divided into two opinions on the draft of the Federal Court Act as if they would be independent of the board, a member or a tool of the Supreme Judicial Council of tools along with the Court of Cassation and the prosecution and Other Destinations and say, "the opinion supported by some MPs including myself, is to make the court an independent board with no authority over them and not be subject to pressure from any quarter, so make sure to be a watchdog on the Judicial Council resolutions, as we fear that leads the opposite opinion that the court committed a timely manner, including will be issued by the Board as a subordinate and not a watchdog. "
The distribution of roles and powers
Mohsen al-Sadoun, a member of another also supports the Legal Committee that there should separate the "Federal Court" for the Judicial Council the authority of opinion, based on the Constitution, which refers in Chapter III of that federal judiciary consists of the Supreme Judicial Council, the Supreme Federal Court, the Federal Court of Cassation , the Prosecutor's Office, and the board of judicial supervision, and other federal courts that are organized according to the law.
He says al-Sadoun of the Kurdistan Democratic Party's "long" is a member, "we find that the separation of the Federal Court option avoids the control of one person on each judicial circuit, because, according to the draft recently connecting the law, will be President of the Judicial Council is the same President of the Federal Court." Sadoun, indicates that "the distribution of roles and powers is important in the judiciary."
Divergent positions
The show, according to the positions of members of the Legal Committee of the Federal Court over the fate of the difficulty in identifying those who stand in favor of the separation of the court or merged with the Judicial Council. Where Kurdish lawmaker says about the block "change" Secretary Baker's "long" that "views on the draft of the Federal Court, not on the level of the blocks, but there are differences in within a single political bloc."
The MP for the "change" from other nearby Kurdish blocs, says he "opposes the idea of separating the Federal Court for the Judicial Council," and that he supports the idea to have to spend a single supreme authority with equal force my presidency, the executive and the legislature.
To that supports two deputies in the legal committee for the National Alliance of different blocs, that the Federal Court to be part of the Judicial Council. He says a member of the State of Law honest frankincense "long" we "support the view that the Federal Court to be part connected to the Council of the judiciary so as not to hold the state budget, which is facing a deficit of billions of dollars, and other financial burdens, if we put the Federal Court is an independent Kahyeh headed by someone other than the Chairman of the Judicial Council. "
Frankincense and reduces fears of the other party, the court exposed to political influences as if it remained part of the Judicial Council, he says, "may be able to push the political struggles of the court, if we committed ourselves to the law and we have a good selection of characters that will be managed."
The other member of the Committee, a sound Shawki on the mass of the citizen says "long": "We prefer that the Federal Court be within the Judicial Council, so do not convert the court to the board within the quota system, which operates accordingly all independent bodies in the country, and Nbadha loop conflict political competition. "
Besides, is expected to face a draft law other objections about the number of scholars in the court and the method of their choice and the candidate of the members of the legal duration of their stay in office, as well as the inside mechanism of action.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
22/03/2015
Long-Presse / Baghdad
Team of refusing to integrate the "Federal Court" the Supreme Council is supposed to eliminate and make their presidency, however, one person, that the first rule on the administrative task between the capital and the provinces political conflicts, and can not be inferior to the Judicial Council for that to be the separation of the two institutions. As they talk about the abuse of power, which may occur if accumulated, however, one person is headed by the two institutions as stated in the draft of the new law, which was presented to Parliament recently, abruptly after he read the old draft of a first reading.
Conversely pro team to make the Federal Court to defend a tool of the Judicial Council that the tools that lead to "protect them from the quota system" in the event turned out to be an independent board, and the pressure of the expenses that would result from the presence of another president independent of the Council.
The opponents of Nuri al-Maliki in the previous parliament were able at the end of 2013 to pass a law, "the Supreme Judicial Council" and neglected the material used to say that the Federal Court is part of the Judicial Council shall nominate the Chairman and members of the tasks, Vvsaloa between the two institutions has led to the loss of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud office in the Judicial Council for a few months, which angered Maliki team then who boycotted the session before that challenged the law, which did not touch him parliament again until now.
Dual Power
He says a member of the Legal Committee of the House of Representatives Kadhim al-Shammari that "the political system in Iraq after 2003 tended to the British system in terms of dual power, she became the executive branch consists of my presidency of the Minister of the Republic, and the legislature of the House of Representatives and the Federal Council (not initiated yet), and according to this must to be a judicial council of the judiciary and the Federal Court. "
Confirms al-Shammari in the national coalition, led by Vice President Iyad Allawi's "long" that the Legal Committee divided into two opinions on the draft of the Federal Court Act as if they would be independent of the board, a member or a tool of the Supreme Judicial Council of tools along with the Court of Cassation and the prosecution and Other Destinations and say, "the opinion supported by some MPs including myself, is to make the court an independent board with no authority over them and not be subject to pressure from any quarter, so make sure to be a watchdog on the Judicial Council resolutions, as we fear that leads the opposite opinion that the court committed a timely manner, including will be issued by the Board as a subordinate and not a watchdog. "
The distribution of roles and powers
Mohsen al-Sadoun, a member of another also supports the Legal Committee that there should separate the "Federal Court" for the Judicial Council the authority of opinion, based on the Constitution, which refers in Chapter III of that federal judiciary consists of the Supreme Judicial Council, the Supreme Federal Court, the Federal Court of Cassation , the Prosecutor's Office, and the board of judicial supervision, and other federal courts that are organized according to the law.
He says al-Sadoun of the Kurdistan Democratic Party's "long" is a member, "we find that the separation of the Federal Court option avoids the control of one person on each judicial circuit, because, according to the draft recently connecting the law, will be President of the Judicial Council is the same President of the Federal Court." Sadoun, indicates that "the distribution of roles and powers is important in the judiciary."
Divergent positions
The show, according to the positions of members of the Legal Committee of the Federal Court over the fate of the difficulty in identifying those who stand in favor of the separation of the court or merged with the Judicial Council. Where Kurdish lawmaker says about the block "change" Secretary Baker's "long" that "views on the draft of the Federal Court, not on the level of the blocks, but there are differences in within a single political bloc."
The MP for the "change" from other nearby Kurdish blocs, says he "opposes the idea of separating the Federal Court for the Judicial Council," and that he supports the idea to have to spend a single supreme authority with equal force my presidency, the executive and the legislature.
To that supports two deputies in the legal committee for the National Alliance of different blocs, that the Federal Court to be part of the Judicial Council. He says a member of the State of Law honest frankincense "long" we "support the view that the Federal Court to be part connected to the Council of the judiciary so as not to hold the state budget, which is facing a deficit of billions of dollars, and other financial burdens, if we put the Federal Court is an independent Kahyeh headed by someone other than the Chairman of the Judicial Council. "
Frankincense and reduces fears of the other party, the court exposed to political influences as if it remained part of the Judicial Council, he says, "may be able to push the political struggles of the court, if we committed ourselves to the law and we have a good selection of characters that will be managed."
The other member of the Committee, a sound Shawki on the mass of the citizen says "long": "We prefer that the Federal Court be within the Judicial Council, so do not convert the court to the board within the quota system, which operates accordingly all independent bodies in the country, and Nbadha loop conflict political competition. "
Besides, is expected to face a draft law other objections about the number of scholars in the court and the method of their choice and the candidate of the members of the legal duration of their stay in office, as well as the inside mechanism of action.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
