Home
Change: National Alliance rejected a Kurdish demand on the Federal Court Act
14/07/2015
Sulaymaniyah
Kurdish movement revealed the change in the Iraqi Council of Representatives bloc, on Tuesday, the refusal of the National Alliance bloc to request a Kurdish head of the Federal Court on the draft law, as described the position of the Union forces as "weak", she stressed the difficulty of passing the law without the consent of the Kurds.
The head of the block change, Hoshyar Abdullah in a statement received by, the (long-Presse), a copy of it, that "the Kurds demanded that the consent of their representatives in the Federal Court is a requirement to pass any decision of the Court on the differences between the federal government and the Kurdistan region, but the National Alliance, the Shia refused to do so ".
Abdullah added, "The attitude of the Iraqi Forces Union (Sunni) was weak to some extent was not supportive of the position of the Kurdish despite the fact that the proposed guarantee other provinces rights", pointing to "the difficulty of passing the bill in the House of Representatives without the consent of the Kurds on the grounds that he needed three fourths majority vote of members of parliament. "
Abdulla, that "the Kurds will not vote in favor of the law in the event of failure to respond to their demand," pointing out that "the Kurds other demands, including that appear on this institution recipe court legal and that sense is not controlled by law scholars and religious cover".
And between Abdullah, that "the Kurdish groups were eager to play a crucial role in holding the court hearings," noting that "the representatives of the Kurds in the Legal Committee worked actively and they caused significant changes in it."
He pointed Abdullah, that "the parliament speaker Salim al has a great desire to pass a Federal Court Act," stressing that "the Kurds can not agree on what did not get passed to ensure that."
And was a member of the Legal Committee in the House of Representatives smile Hilali revealed, in (18 May 2015), the existence of a solution to most of the disputes relating to the Federal Court Law and an amendment to the drafted before the vote, and as pointed out that the dispute still exists on the number of scholars of Islam, the Federal Court, suggested pass a law in the parliament majority.
The presidency of the Iraqi Council of Representatives decided during the 36th parliamentary session of the second legislative term of the first legislative year, which was held on the sixth of May 2015, to postpone the vote on the draft of the Federal Court Act until further notice because of differences on paragraph 12 of the Act, which states that vote will be in court two-thirds of the member, while insisting the Kurdistan Alliance to be a vote of all members.
The Federal Supreme Court, an independent judicial body, financially and administratively, according to the Provisions of Article 92 of the Constitution, and consists of a number of judges and experts in Islamic jurisprudence and legal scholars, whose number and manner of selection and work of the Court, the law enacted two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives by a majority.
The members of the Legal Committee revealed the most important adjustments made to the new draft, which summarized by making the presidency of the Federal Court of the powers of the Judicial Council, in contrast to attempts were the end of the previous session of the separation between the two positions, as well as increasing the number of members of the Court to 13, including 4 of Shariah scholars who will be given the right to veto laws that are contrary to the law, as a former minister, he said that the new draft stipulates that decisions taken by consensus within the Court majority does not.
The project of the Federal Court Act, one of the controversial topics that have not been resolved during the previous legislative sessions, which require consensus among the parliamentary blocs in the new session.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
14/07/2015
Sulaymaniyah
Kurdish movement revealed the change in the Iraqi Council of Representatives bloc, on Tuesday, the refusal of the National Alliance bloc to request a Kurdish head of the Federal Court on the draft law, as described the position of the Union forces as "weak", she stressed the difficulty of passing the law without the consent of the Kurds.
The head of the block change, Hoshyar Abdullah in a statement received by, the (long-Presse), a copy of it, that "the Kurds demanded that the consent of their representatives in the Federal Court is a requirement to pass any decision of the Court on the differences between the federal government and the Kurdistan region, but the National Alliance, the Shia refused to do so ".
Abdullah added, "The attitude of the Iraqi Forces Union (Sunni) was weak to some extent was not supportive of the position of the Kurdish despite the fact that the proposed guarantee other provinces rights", pointing to "the difficulty of passing the bill in the House of Representatives without the consent of the Kurds on the grounds that he needed three fourths majority vote of members of parliament. "
Abdulla, that "the Kurds will not vote in favor of the law in the event of failure to respond to their demand," pointing out that "the Kurds other demands, including that appear on this institution recipe court legal and that sense is not controlled by law scholars and religious cover".
And between Abdullah, that "the Kurdish groups were eager to play a crucial role in holding the court hearings," noting that "the representatives of the Kurds in the Legal Committee worked actively and they caused significant changes in it."
He pointed Abdullah, that "the parliament speaker Salim al has a great desire to pass a Federal Court Act," stressing that "the Kurds can not agree on what did not get passed to ensure that."
And was a member of the Legal Committee in the House of Representatives smile Hilali revealed, in (18 May 2015), the existence of a solution to most of the disputes relating to the Federal Court Law and an amendment to the drafted before the vote, and as pointed out that the dispute still exists on the number of scholars of Islam, the Federal Court, suggested pass a law in the parliament majority.
The presidency of the Iraqi Council of Representatives decided during the 36th parliamentary session of the second legislative term of the first legislative year, which was held on the sixth of May 2015, to postpone the vote on the draft of the Federal Court Act until further notice because of differences on paragraph 12 of the Act, which states that vote will be in court two-thirds of the member, while insisting the Kurdistan Alliance to be a vote of all members.
The Federal Supreme Court, an independent judicial body, financially and administratively, according to the Provisions of Article 92 of the Constitution, and consists of a number of judges and experts in Islamic jurisprudence and legal scholars, whose number and manner of selection and work of the Court, the law enacted two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives by a majority.
The members of the Legal Committee revealed the most important adjustments made to the new draft, which summarized by making the presidency of the Federal Court of the powers of the Judicial Council, in contrast to attempts were the end of the previous session of the separation between the two positions, as well as increasing the number of members of the Court to 13, including 4 of Shariah scholars who will be given the right to veto laws that are contrary to the law, as a former minister, he said that the new draft stipulates that decisions taken by consensus within the Court majority does not.
The project of the Federal Court Act, one of the controversial topics that have not been resolved during the previous legislative sessions, which require consensus among the parliamentary blocs in the new session.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
