8/30/2015
It led general questions addressed to the Minister of Electricity in the questioning session, and its lack of specialization, to the conviction of more than 150 deputies Pajupth. And prompted questions asked by the MP, who took over the task of questioning, which the minister belongs to the same block, to claim some parliamentarians to question former ministers, and load responsibility for these power crisis, including the current Minister of Higher Education Hussain al-Shahristani. And it emphasizes specialized parliamentary committees that the questions asked of the MP questioned Fahadaoa prepared without the use of the energy committee or any other agency. While parliamentary parties say the vote was "convinced of Representatives answers and not in the performance of the minister." According to some lawmakers, the opportunity still exists to dismiss Fahdawi, as can the parliament that brings together other evidence "does not accept the doubt" to remove him from office. The decision sparked resentment parliamentary clear, as the MP said Majida al-Tamimi, during a press conference held after questioning "Fahdawi" the end of the hearing that "there are documents and papers my possession mounted with a lot of cases in which condemns the Minister of Electricity." She added, "I will submit a request for questioning." I promised the President of the will of the Movement MP Hanan al, to vote on the conviction answers Electricity Minister Qassim Fahdawi "political suicide to Parliament." The demonstrations, which came out in late July and moved from Basra to the rest of the provinces, has demanded the removal of Fahdawi.
Frustrating and non-specialized questions
He says Zaher al-Abadi, a member of the Parliamentary Committee for Energy (range), "The questions asked by the MP were not questioned the level of ambition and escalation against the popular media and the Minister of Electricity." "The questions did not prove the existence of financial or administrative corruption caused Ptlka production and distribution of electricity." He stressed that "questions were" general and non-specialized. "
And it describes the MP questioned al-Abadi, a member of the coalition forces, as "a specialist in the field of energy has not consulted the parliamentary energy committee."
He said the National Alliance member that "the MP Salah al-Jubouri raised two important questions about the minister associated with one of the consultancy offices, and one of the officials in the office employee in the Ministry of Electricity, another question about the assignment of one of the stations of the establishment," but due to the stresses that "questions were lacking the evidence and the evidence."
He said a member of the Energy Committee that "the rest of the questions were related to commercial issues, about converting the station to a particular company, or about issues occurred in the past and Minister of Electricity time."
Dismissal is still possible
MP says Zaher al-Abadi that his committee made recommendations, last week, to the presidency of the parliament to "open an investigation with all those responsible for the energy file current and former."
And sees the reform bloc member that "the opportunity to sack the Minister of Electricity has not yet TFT, and can be formed rapidly Commission to check the minister and the collection of evidence and the evidence that he said condemned."
The new House of Representatives, on Saturday, the Minister of Electricity confidence after a heated interrogation session. The questioning of the minister after prevarication to come to parliament, raising the wrath of parliamentary parties waved his dismissal in the event of a repeat fails to attend the parliament session.
He took Salah al-Jubouri, MP for the coalition forces, the task of questioning the minister in a meeting held in the presence of 260 deputies and chaired by Salim al. 152 deputies voted in favor of the Fahadaoa, against the objection 46 deputies, with 41 deputies.
The minister wanted to block his dismissal
To say that the fact that Mohammed, a member of the Integrity Committee, in an interview (range), "The vote in the questioning of the Minister of Electricity session was on his answers and not on his performance."
He denied the fact that to be "behind it a deal between the political blocs", as the frequency of protests among activists. He stressed that "some members of the bloc minister were strongly unwilling to sack him."
He said Badr bloc member, "that questions the quality of the answers Fahdawi prompted some lawmakers to download and former ministers responsible for the power crisis such as a key to the Committee on Energy and former former, and chairman of the former energy-Maliki Hussain al-Shahristani government, also demanded to interrogate the former minister of electricity, similar to the current minister."
MP Mohammad revealed the fact that "the prime minister is determined to interrogate all the ministers who raised doubts about their ministries, including the Minister of Water Resources Mohsen al-Shammari."
Included reforms of the House of Representatives, which announced on August 11 current days after the launch of the "al-Abadi reform" package to invite the Prime Minister to "dismiss all of the Minister of Electricity and Water Resources Minister and all those found shortcomings in the ministry management and the interests of people with its validity and in accordance with the package constitutional mechanism ".
The minister was not responsible!
So says Nora Albjara, a Deputy for Fahdawi block (range), "The Minister of Electricity is not solely responsible for the energy crisis in the country," asserting that "most of the ministry's contracts that revolve around suspicions of corruption have been concluded during the reign of the former minister."
It Albjara "can not load a block coalition forces responsible for not sacking Fahdawi," asserting that "coalition forces does not have a majority in Parliament to give the vote in favor of the Minister of Electricity", noting that the mass "is the collected signatures to question the minister."
And reveal the MP conductivity that "the questioning session witnessed a dispute over the interpretation of Article 61 of the Constitution relating to withdraw confidence from the questioner and to suggest that the withdrawal of confidence being a week after the interrogation," and shows that "the President of the Parliament, and a solution to the forms, decided to present the vote on the contentment with answers Fahdawi" .
Albjara believes that "the interrogation Fahdawi will encourage the rest of the Parliament on the grill ministers and officials," asserting that "the first step towards the demands of the demonstrators."
Wael of grace ....
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]