Home
Are the Republicans will bring their troops to Iraq?
On: Wed, 01/11/2012 10:11
Baghdad / Majid flood
after nine years the Americans in Iraq, and was the result of the overthrow of Saddam, for all the complexity and challenge and satisfaction that was issued by this presence, and after a journey full of events, the bloody, the Iraqis from a deal pulled under which all forces,
The Iraqis celebrated the day as has become a symbol of sovereignty, but it seems that Iraq is still at the moment and trump and stressful, however, this or that country, it has become propaganda material of the heads of Americans, President Obama was the slogan of President Hu to withdraw troops from Iraq, under the banner of the largest is ( change),
now and in surprising and surprisingly came out presidential candidate U.S. Sen. words is closer to the imagination, as promised, Rick Perry, yesterday re-send his troops to Iraq in the event of arrival to the presidency to prevent the "Iranian expansion," describing the decision by President Barack Obama to withdraw U.S. troops of the country to "a big mistake," and explained that "Obama was able to negotiate the time period for withdrawal from Iraq." This is a clear indication that Iraq, despite the devastation suffered by now, it can be a maker of presidents, at the same time hints at the observer, the question of U.S. withdrawal may seem like a joke, MP for the Liberal block of the Sadrist movement Rafi Abd al-Jabbar In an interview with the (range), expressed outrage at the remarks, calling the words of Rick Perry Ballamntqa and that he is ignorant of international law. He said Abdul-Jabbar, "Iraq today declared its independence and there is no reason for the return of any foreign troops to him, and he gained international legitimacy, the exit of occupation forces," and "We have been the U.S. withdrawal in accordance with the Convention can not be adopted by the Convention on the other, and there is no legal argument for any Activity , and that any military presence is the new occupation of Iraq. " It seems that the strategy the U.S. about Iraq suffer duplication and conflict at the level of wills between Republicans and Democrats looked through as disclosed Perry that "the idea Smahana for the Iranians to return to Iraq and control, with all the sacrifice of its treasures, whether in blood or money, is only an attempt by President Obama to be subject to left-wing liberals ", describing the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq as" a big mistake. " It is noticeable that the two sides of the Iranian and the U.S. took from Iraq is room for maneuver and compromise, as the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been directed, on 22 October 2011, a veiled warning to Iran not to seek to interfere in Iraqi affairs, the day after confirmation of President Barack Obama an American military withdrawal from Iraq at the end of last year. As Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a television interview, remarks by President Barack Obama on withdrawal as a "good thing" and expressed his belief that "will lead to a change in relations between Tehran and Baghdad. And the position of the Sadrist movement, specifically" Mahdi Army "of these statements, especially The Sadrists stopped its activity and a century his resistance against the occupation, said Abdul-Jabbar "that the Mahdi Army, the formation of an ideological and is ready to face any occupation, and that the freeze does not mean it will stand idly about any threat to the sovereignty of Iraq," Iraq had signed with the United States, During 2008, the Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from the strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security, based on the Strategic Framework Agreement and to reduce the number of PRTs in the provinces, as well as providing important sustainable rule of law, including the development program the police and the completion of the coordination, supervision and the report of the Fund of Iraq relief and reconstruction.
In the same context, depicts politicians Americans, particularly Republicans, one way or another that Iraq is entering a phase of chaotic civil war, but also reached the limit that the most likely member of the U.S. Senate, Senator John McCain, the collapse of the Iraqi government and the disintegration of Iraq into three different countries, stressing that the proliferation of militias and death squads in the country and the escalation of political tension and "asylum" Iraqi Vice President to Erbil evidence of the disintegration of the country.
He said U.S. Senator John McCain during a televised debate, said that "Iraq is fragmented, threatening lives of thousands of American civilians working in the country, "likely to" witness the disintegration of Iraq, which could eventually lead to the formation of three different states within it. "This indicates that the Republicans In the case of victory in the elections, they will make a new policy toward Iraq, and may be encountered and address escalating blows all the arrangements are held with the Obama administration and the Iraqi government.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
