Home
Benefits presidencies: Maliki's office denies the claim .. Talabani and damaged most of the cancellation
Thursday, February 2, 2012 14:35
Hits: 22
BAGHDAD - Saadoun Firas al-Hamdani
Said a source familiar with the "world", said Wednesday that President Jalal Talabani will be more affected by the abolition of social benefits for the three presidencies in the budget 2012. This came after he announced a member of the Parliamentary Integrity Commission, on Wednesday, raising more than 100 signatures of MPs called for the removal of those benefits.
While no information is available until the time of preparing this report yesterday evening at the Information Office of the President of the House of Representatives on the position of presidency of the Council of the demand for the abolition of benefits, the adviser in the Office of the Prime Minister stressed, on Wednesday, to head the government did not claim any social benefits for the year.
, Said the informed source that "the President of the cancellation of the affected social benefits for the presidency is the president (Talabani)." He attributed this to the "salary is limited, as he constantly donates to civil society organizations and helps writers and patients," before he corrects by saying that "the same case with the presidency of the parliament."
No information was available immediately to Akram al-Obeidi, spokesman for House Speaker's position on Nujaifi claim to cancel the social benefits, noting the "world" that "access to certain information in this subject requires several hours."
Mary Rayes denied the Chancellor in the Office of the Prime Minister to be prime minister requested the inclusion of social benefits in the budget of 2012. And confirmed in an interview with the "world" that "the claims did not come from the prime minister" in the hint that it may have come from my presidency of the Republic and the Parliament.
In this context, the informed source, who asked the "world" not to be named, said that "Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has the potential and the ability to win large sums of money under the doors of many of them the door of national reconciliation." He continued, "Therefore, the social benefits are not necessary to have."
The House of Representatives voted nearly a year before the abolition of social benefits for the three presidencies in full, after that set out in paragraph 21 of the general federal budget for 2011.
In a statement to "the world," said Ahmed electrodes member of the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives "Sferna social benefits in 2011 was not paid one dinar," as he emphasized that it "exists in the budget of 2012 under a separate section, which are equal for the three presidencies," but he did not mention the amount.
But Mary Rayes said that "social benefits mentioned in the 2012 budget less than two million per year for each president." And commented, "This can not be canceled because it's like Balnthreyh, and the President and his deputies to help people in the social aspects." And continued, "As in past years were benefits for the presidency up to one million dollars a month."
The Chancellor saw in Maliki's office that the "social benefits mentioned in the budget of 2012 are to be lifted, because they do not compare the amounts that were allocated to the presidency in the past years."
However, Hussein al-Asadi MP for the State of Law coalition, led by al-Maliki talked about the collection of signatures from more than 100 for the purpose of the abolition of social benefits for the three presidencies in the current year budget. Asadi said at a news conference at the headquarters of the House of Representatives that "the return of social benefits for the three presidencies to the current year budget 2012 after cancellation of the budget last year, 2011, raised the ire of a number of deputies, which invited us to collect signatures for the cancellation of the benefits from this year's budget."
He continued that the Asadi "request cancellation of social benefits may not be included transfers between the doors of public, in order not to circumvent the law." He pointed out that "some parties benefited from the social benefits after the cancellation through the reallocation of items within the budget" in the last year.
The Court of Audit in his report for 2010 published by the "world" on the panel that the House "spent several amounts (social benefits) to employees of the Council contrary to the provisions of Article (29) of the Code of Federal budget for the year 2008." And the amounts allocated to the Social Secretariat of the Council of Ministers, the report "noted disbursements to employees of the Office grouped at the expense of social benefits, contrary to Article (1) paragraph (4) of the Implementing Regulations of the Federal budget for the year 2009."
The high-Nassif, a member of the Integrity Committee in the House said "the world" in the news story published on 17 August 2011 that "the abolition of social benefits was due to be exploited by the three presidencies to achieve personal benefits, not the calculated benefits of the Iraqi state."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
