Home
After the success of d. Chalabi abolished, article 36, the payment term, enter the political debates
Conference / Sam and Mullah
After the success of the Chairman of the Committee fact-finding parliamentary deputy Ahmad Abdul Hadi Chalabi, cancel article 36 relating to the completion of projects according to the payment system on credit and raised the article a lot of controversies, which amounted to a threat to the leadership of the coalition of state law Hassan Sinead, to resign, as confirmed most of the parliamentarians that the article was canceled and they are committed to the abolition .
He criticized the National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi payment on credit policy, considering it as a reason for the accumulation of debt on Iraq. Chalabi said there promotion in the media by some that the abolition of Article (36) will cause the work of the government, while the purpose of it off because it allows the government external borrowing (or payment on credit) and then, this article is the reason for the accumulation of debt on Iraq previously, which amounted to more than (140) billion dollars. He added that this will not happen in the future because Iraq has the money, noting that the Constitution stressed the independence of the central bank and the prohibition upon lending to the government and the government should come to parliament for leave to borrow.
As said the head of the Liberal MP Bahaa al-Araji told (the Conference): The government is obliged as voted by the House of Representatives, and can the injured party, whether it is a political bloc or government to resort to the Federal Court for a lawsuit, but in practice, this procedure will not connects to anything. Indicating the following: that the media frenzy around the paragraphs of the budget during the previous period came to the bidding of political, while there are some political blocs have lost not to vote on certain paragraphs of the budget and this matter of course because the budget for the Iraqi people and did not block or a party, saying: that the budget law has stages internal, and after the House vote by the majority provided for the House of Representatives can not be changed in paragraphs, and even the government can not return it. Explained that the government is today bound paragraphs budget, and especially the last paragraph of the Moana, which says that this law is effective from the moment the vote the Council of Representatives, and not from the moment of publication in the Official Gazette, and publishing will be a formality, and the government began proceedings publication.
For his part, MP Hassan gave the mass of citizens were part of the National Alliance, told the (conference): We are not with the payment on credit and we are not with the budget deficit and we are not with going to the known cases results in advance and is governed by the general situation in the region and through extrapolations to the above we are with the principle of prevention, we should not go to the deficit or pay on credit. Indicating the following: that within the rules of procedure can restore some of the paragraphs for discussion or amendment of some laws, and within existing mechanisms, but most of the political blocs agreed to abolish Article 36 back to the Parliament does not change a thing.
And at the same MP said the Iraqi List, Nabil Hrbo told (the Conference): The paragraph at issue, which is paragraph 36 above to the House of Representatives to consider and reach a conviction of the need to make way for the provincial councils for investment projects and not restrict the Government as indicated in this article. And House of Representatives did not vote according to the directions of the political blocs, but rather a result of his conviction to serve the people, so we see that the council will insist on the abolition of this paragraph, even if she returned to him. Certain: that the Iraqi List, with the abolition of Article 36 of the budget, and to allow the provinces to act on the amounts allocated to investment projects, and Iraqi forces will remain in its position as the view that this strategic action serves everyone.
In the same vein MP said the state law, Abbas al-Bayati told (the conference): Budget Act and has a way of legislation, and the party that sent the law have the right to send the amendments to the law, since this law came from the government, it is the right of the government to send an amendment to it. Indicating the following: that according to Article 62 is not entitled to the House of Representatives that introduces the doors, while the Council has introduced in this budget and canceled the other doors. Explained that the Council of Ministers of the right to demand the re-vote on some of the paragraphs relating to the budget, and we are waiting for the Federal Court decision on this matter. Certain: that the State of Law coalition will work to move the initiative in order to re-consider a number of paragraphs.
The House of Representatives had voted to abolish Article 36, payment information on credit for projects from the budget of 2012 in the Special Session of the adoption of the current year budget.
The budget remains controversial with the increasing objections and criticisms, especially by the provinces, which are amounts allocated to them did not match the size of population is not sufficient to provide services.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Conference / Sam and Mullah
After the success of the Chairman of the Committee fact-finding parliamentary deputy Ahmad Abdul Hadi Chalabi, cancel article 36 relating to the completion of projects according to the payment system on credit and raised the article a lot of controversies, which amounted to a threat to the leadership of the coalition of state law Hassan Sinead, to resign, as confirmed most of the parliamentarians that the article was canceled and they are committed to the abolition .
He criticized the National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi payment on credit policy, considering it as a reason for the accumulation of debt on Iraq. Chalabi said there promotion in the media by some that the abolition of Article (36) will cause the work of the government, while the purpose of it off because it allows the government external borrowing (or payment on credit) and then, this article is the reason for the accumulation of debt on Iraq previously, which amounted to more than (140) billion dollars. He added that this will not happen in the future because Iraq has the money, noting that the Constitution stressed the independence of the central bank and the prohibition upon lending to the government and the government should come to parliament for leave to borrow.
As said the head of the Liberal MP Bahaa al-Araji told (the Conference): The government is obliged as voted by the House of Representatives, and can the injured party, whether it is a political bloc or government to resort to the Federal Court for a lawsuit, but in practice, this procedure will not connects to anything. Indicating the following: that the media frenzy around the paragraphs of the budget during the previous period came to the bidding of political, while there are some political blocs have lost not to vote on certain paragraphs of the budget and this matter of course because the budget for the Iraqi people and did not block or a party, saying: that the budget law has stages internal, and after the House vote by the majority provided for the House of Representatives can not be changed in paragraphs, and even the government can not return it. Explained that the government is today bound paragraphs budget, and especially the last paragraph of the Moana, which says that this law is effective from the moment the vote the Council of Representatives, and not from the moment of publication in the Official Gazette, and publishing will be a formality, and the government began proceedings publication.
For his part, MP Hassan gave the mass of citizens were part of the National Alliance, told the (conference): We are not with the payment on credit and we are not with the budget deficit and we are not with going to the known cases results in advance and is governed by the general situation in the region and through extrapolations to the above we are with the principle of prevention, we should not go to the deficit or pay on credit. Indicating the following: that within the rules of procedure can restore some of the paragraphs for discussion or amendment of some laws, and within existing mechanisms, but most of the political blocs agreed to abolish Article 36 back to the Parliament does not change a thing.
And at the same MP said the Iraqi List, Nabil Hrbo told (the Conference): The paragraph at issue, which is paragraph 36 above to the House of Representatives to consider and reach a conviction of the need to make way for the provincial councils for investment projects and not restrict the Government as indicated in this article. And House of Representatives did not vote according to the directions of the political blocs, but rather a result of his conviction to serve the people, so we see that the council will insist on the abolition of this paragraph, even if she returned to him. Certain: that the Iraqi List, with the abolition of Article 36 of the budget, and to allow the provinces to act on the amounts allocated to investment projects, and Iraqi forces will remain in its position as the view that this strategic action serves everyone.
In the same vein MP said the state law, Abbas al-Bayati told (the conference): Budget Act and has a way of legislation, and the party that sent the law have the right to send the amendments to the law, since this law came from the government, it is the right of the government to send an amendment to it. Indicating the following: that according to Article 62 is not entitled to the House of Representatives that introduces the doors, while the Council has introduced in this budget and canceled the other doors. Explained that the Council of Ministers of the right to demand the re-vote on some of the paragraphs relating to the budget, and we are waiting for the Federal Court decision on this matter. Certain: that the State of Law coalition will work to move the initiative in order to re-consider a number of paragraphs.
The House of Representatives had voted to abolish Article 36, payment information on credit for projects from the budget of 2012 in the Special Session of the adoption of the current year budget.
The budget remains controversial with the increasing objections and criticisms, especially by the provinces, which are amounts allocated to them did not match the size of population is not sufficient to provide services.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
