Home
There are only 48 hours after the end of the deadline set by the Sadrist movement .. start searching for an alternative to the owners of
Haider Ali Jawad - 15/05/2012
Tell the Sadr movement, "the world", with the names of the National Alliance, "al-Jaafari," and "Chalabi", and "al-Shahristani," and "Khuzaie," as substitutes for al-Maliki in the event of withdrawal of confidence from the government after the expiry of the deadline set by the paper and the second meeting of Arbil. The deadline tomorrow, May 16. He revealed the Sadrists support for Jafari among the four figures.
Did not identify the Iraqi List, until yesterday afternoon to withdraw confidence from its position, at the time was preparing for a meeting of its members in the evening.
It considered that the replacement of the existing al-Maliki Jaafari will not change the existing policy, but did not object to the person such as the Kurds, who announced their alliance with queued "consensus clusters", unlikely to face difficulty in selecting an alternative to the owners .. Alternative that would not be the same al-Maliki is from the perspective of a coalition of state law under which the withdrawal of confidence from the government and its leader, the existence of realistic justifications and constitutional, charging at the same time the three parties to Erbil (the Sadrists and the Iraqi Kurds) prepare a draft prior to topple the government.
In an interview with "the world", on Monday, said Abdul Amir Mayahi MP from the Sadrist movement, "We still adhere to the National Alliance and certain alternative would be within the Alliance, and among the figures put forward by Mr. Jaafari and Ahmad Chalabi, Hussein Shahristani, and Khodair al." This was followed by "All options are."
And the position of the mass of the four bench Mayahi stressed that "the closest to the Liberal cluster is Mr. Jaafari, and there was a questionnaire prior to the Sadrist movement have supported the al-Jaafari as prime minister."
And added, "al-Jaafari was a period of very short, during which he was able to have experience as prime minister." With regard to the positions of the other blocs said, "From my contact with members of the House of Representatives in the other blocs, now they accept and match to Mr. Jaafari to be considered a national figure, a moderate." "We support him from within the National Alliance and other blocs such as the Iraqi List."
The newspaper reported the Kuwaiti political, yesterday, in the words of Mayahi saying that there is a tendency to al-Maliki to resign as prime minister, a condition that selects the National Alliance President Ibrahim al-Jaafari substitute.
And on what came in the newspaper explained Mayahi, "I said what he said al-Maliki in a media interviews that he is prepared to resign from the government to be a variant of the National Alliance, and declare in a meeting of the alliance on the air."
About grace and prime minister, who is nearing completion that "the Liberal bloc is still insisting that al-Maliki implemented as stated in the agreement Arbil, the second, otherwise there will be a withdrawal of confidence from the government." However, "the issue of withdrawal of confidence from the government and form a new government, a subject that requires time and is not something easy." Sadrist MP and that "no confidence will be a specific mechanism to resolve it quickly." Commenting on the position of state law to withdraw confidence from the parliament and my presidency of the Republic if they withdrew from the government that "their point of view. And if the reaction time and subject to withdraw confidence from the government then I think it will affect the other presidencies."
In an interview with "the world", yesterday, said Ziad worldwide abolition MP for the Iraqi List, "did not determine our choice so far, but we have a meeting at eight o'clock in the evening today (yesterday) all members of the Iraqi List, will be discussing the position of the list of the deadline given to the Government, and also the provincial elections to come. " "The deadline will expire the day after tomorrow (tomorrow), but do not want to get ahead of ourselves and say that Mr. Maliki will have extensive contacts with some of the parties of the Iraqi List, and even with the Sadrist movement." He pointed out that al-Maliki, "promised the former a lot of promises, but when it gets certain benefits related to his name back, sometimes regardless of the gains of the rest and achieve a real partnership."
He stressed, "there must be more understanding before going to this step (no confidence)."
He expressed his belief that the worldwide abolition "no confidence at the present time is not a welfare entities, but to sit at a negotiating table to resolve the outstanding problems." This was followed by "the best solution is to implement the Convention on Arbil, and if not carried out must be solved."
He reported, "We personally do not have forms for Mr. Jaafari, but I do not think that the policy change and things go as he wants political partners in the event of replacement of Mr. Maliki, Mr. Jaafari, and may be the National Alliance, full of talent, and can achieve a national partnership by nominating one of the National Alliance ".
MP for the Iraqi List, expressed his vision that "the Kurdistan Alliance has no tendency to Mr. Jaafari, and I do not want to speak on their tongues, but they had a position very, very tough in the previous session of al-Jaafari. And through my meetings with some MPs Kurds see that they have a reservation to Mr. Jaafari. " For his part, Khalil Mahma MP from Kurdistan Alliance "We are with the consensus of the blocks, I do not think we will face difficulties in the case of choosing an alternative to the owners, and we will be in agreement through dialogue."
He added in remarks to "the world," yesterday, "We are with the decisions made by the Consultative Conference in Erbil, and came out a clear message that the government should work after the deadline to the implementation of agreements Erbil, and if it does not comply (Maliki) will be all the options open."
Asked Mohammed Chihod deputy coalition of state law, "What is intended implemented during the 15 days granted to the government?". The Delegation said in an interview with the "world," yesterday, "The message that came from Moqtada al-Sadr and Allawi and Najafi and Barzani if they were talking about the services it our demand, and a fortiori be directed to the ministers concerned are from the Sadrists and the Iraqi List, and are not ministers of state law." "We are talking about define the powers of the Prime Minister and the implementation of the agreements within 15 days of Arbil, and even if we assume it is a controversy can not be implemented during this time."
He asked Chihod again, "Why can not everyone sits for dialogue even agree on the possibility of implementation of demands can be implemented and thus leaving the material that intersect with the Constitution?". He asserted that "the issue is not subject points and the time limit given to the Government, as it is a draft prepared by the three who signed the paper and rally the largest possible number of votes to withdraw confidence from the government."
He believed that "these trends are not the result today, but since the formation of the government and the far, some parties of the Iraqi List, and some parties of the Kurdistan Alliance, does not appeal to them with a stable government and build the institutions of the state, they want Iraq weak and the government is weak even act like what they want." And an alternative to the Prime Minister stressed Chihod "The alternative is a far-Maliki Maliki, it is imperative at this stage, to the great achievements." Continued, "Usually when withdraw confidence from the government there is a justification."
He also wondered, "What is the justification for the withdrawal of confidence from the government?". He explained, "is supposed to be justified and realistic and the constitutionality of no-confidence, and the letter after the 15-day no-confidence motion, but no-confidence debate within the National Alliance." He pointed out that "the coalition held a meeting to discuss the paper did not get a consensus within the message."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Haider Ali Jawad - 15/05/2012
Tell the Sadr movement, "the world", with the names of the National Alliance, "al-Jaafari," and "Chalabi", and "al-Shahristani," and "Khuzaie," as substitutes for al-Maliki in the event of withdrawal of confidence from the government after the expiry of the deadline set by the paper and the second meeting of Arbil. The deadline tomorrow, May 16. He revealed the Sadrists support for Jafari among the four figures.
Did not identify the Iraqi List, until yesterday afternoon to withdraw confidence from its position, at the time was preparing for a meeting of its members in the evening.
It considered that the replacement of the existing al-Maliki Jaafari will not change the existing policy, but did not object to the person such as the Kurds, who announced their alliance with queued "consensus clusters", unlikely to face difficulty in selecting an alternative to the owners .. Alternative that would not be the same al-Maliki is from the perspective of a coalition of state law under which the withdrawal of confidence from the government and its leader, the existence of realistic justifications and constitutional, charging at the same time the three parties to Erbil (the Sadrists and the Iraqi Kurds) prepare a draft prior to topple the government.
In an interview with "the world", on Monday, said Abdul Amir Mayahi MP from the Sadrist movement, "We still adhere to the National Alliance and certain alternative would be within the Alliance, and among the figures put forward by Mr. Jaafari and Ahmad Chalabi, Hussein Shahristani, and Khodair al." This was followed by "All options are."
And the position of the mass of the four bench Mayahi stressed that "the closest to the Liberal cluster is Mr. Jaafari, and there was a questionnaire prior to the Sadrist movement have supported the al-Jaafari as prime minister."
And added, "al-Jaafari was a period of very short, during which he was able to have experience as prime minister." With regard to the positions of the other blocs said, "From my contact with members of the House of Representatives in the other blocs, now they accept and match to Mr. Jaafari to be considered a national figure, a moderate." "We support him from within the National Alliance and other blocs such as the Iraqi List."
The newspaper reported the Kuwaiti political, yesterday, in the words of Mayahi saying that there is a tendency to al-Maliki to resign as prime minister, a condition that selects the National Alliance President Ibrahim al-Jaafari substitute.
And on what came in the newspaper explained Mayahi, "I said what he said al-Maliki in a media interviews that he is prepared to resign from the government to be a variant of the National Alliance, and declare in a meeting of the alliance on the air."
About grace and prime minister, who is nearing completion that "the Liberal bloc is still insisting that al-Maliki implemented as stated in the agreement Arbil, the second, otherwise there will be a withdrawal of confidence from the government." However, "the issue of withdrawal of confidence from the government and form a new government, a subject that requires time and is not something easy." Sadrist MP and that "no confidence will be a specific mechanism to resolve it quickly." Commenting on the position of state law to withdraw confidence from the parliament and my presidency of the Republic if they withdrew from the government that "their point of view. And if the reaction time and subject to withdraw confidence from the government then I think it will affect the other presidencies."
In an interview with "the world", yesterday, said Ziad worldwide abolition MP for the Iraqi List, "did not determine our choice so far, but we have a meeting at eight o'clock in the evening today (yesterday) all members of the Iraqi List, will be discussing the position of the list of the deadline given to the Government, and also the provincial elections to come. " "The deadline will expire the day after tomorrow (tomorrow), but do not want to get ahead of ourselves and say that Mr. Maliki will have extensive contacts with some of the parties of the Iraqi List, and even with the Sadrist movement." He pointed out that al-Maliki, "promised the former a lot of promises, but when it gets certain benefits related to his name back, sometimes regardless of the gains of the rest and achieve a real partnership."
He stressed, "there must be more understanding before going to this step (no confidence)."
He expressed his belief that the worldwide abolition "no confidence at the present time is not a welfare entities, but to sit at a negotiating table to resolve the outstanding problems." This was followed by "the best solution is to implement the Convention on Arbil, and if not carried out must be solved."
He reported, "We personally do not have forms for Mr. Jaafari, but I do not think that the policy change and things go as he wants political partners in the event of replacement of Mr. Maliki, Mr. Jaafari, and may be the National Alliance, full of talent, and can achieve a national partnership by nominating one of the National Alliance ".
MP for the Iraqi List, expressed his vision that "the Kurdistan Alliance has no tendency to Mr. Jaafari, and I do not want to speak on their tongues, but they had a position very, very tough in the previous session of al-Jaafari. And through my meetings with some MPs Kurds see that they have a reservation to Mr. Jaafari. " For his part, Khalil Mahma MP from Kurdistan Alliance "We are with the consensus of the blocks, I do not think we will face difficulties in the case of choosing an alternative to the owners, and we will be in agreement through dialogue."
He added in remarks to "the world," yesterday, "We are with the decisions made by the Consultative Conference in Erbil, and came out a clear message that the government should work after the deadline to the implementation of agreements Erbil, and if it does not comply (Maliki) will be all the options open."
Asked Mohammed Chihod deputy coalition of state law, "What is intended implemented during the 15 days granted to the government?". The Delegation said in an interview with the "world," yesterday, "The message that came from Moqtada al-Sadr and Allawi and Najafi and Barzani if they were talking about the services it our demand, and a fortiori be directed to the ministers concerned are from the Sadrists and the Iraqi List, and are not ministers of state law." "We are talking about define the powers of the Prime Minister and the implementation of the agreements within 15 days of Arbil, and even if we assume it is a controversy can not be implemented during this time."
He asked Chihod again, "Why can not everyone sits for dialogue even agree on the possibility of implementation of demands can be implemented and thus leaving the material that intersect with the Constitution?". He asserted that "the issue is not subject points and the time limit given to the Government, as it is a draft prepared by the three who signed the paper and rally the largest possible number of votes to withdraw confidence from the government."
He believed that "these trends are not the result today, but since the formation of the government and the far, some parties of the Iraqi List, and some parties of the Kurdistan Alliance, does not appeal to them with a stable government and build the institutions of the state, they want Iraq weak and the government is weak even act like what they want." And an alternative to the Prime Minister stressed Chihod "The alternative is a far-Maliki Maliki, it is imperative at this stage, to the great achievements." Continued, "Usually when withdraw confidence from the government there is a justification."
He also wondered, "What is the justification for the withdrawal of confidence from the government?". He explained, "is supposed to be justified and realistic and the constitutionality of no-confidence, and the letter after the 15-day no-confidence motion, but no-confidence debate within the National Alliance." He pointed out that "the coalition held a meeting to discuss the paper did not get a consensus within the message."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
