Home
Sheikh small: for these reasons I believe that the vote of no confidence from the government is not a solution
04/06/2012 PM - 6:15 PM
In answer to a question to Shaykh little about the reasons that make it say that the vote of no confidence is not a solution, and the nature of what discretion of solutions Shaykh: The main problem with contemporary is that politicians without the mechanism governing conflicts or that these mechanisms are no longer supplier adoption everyone, has tampered with the parties to the Federal Court since 2007 until he returned for one to trust provisions or say that its provisions have become a resource doubt, after making the Constitution as the governing basis of conflicts, the futility of the parties to the independence of the Electoral Commission for elections the governing second until no longer an option Alaudhh for elections assured, and worked the Maliki government for as long ruled without internal system and in spite of the promise in the agreements, the round table type during the first six months of forming the government, and there have elapsed of the life of the government is elapsed and still at a standstill, a governing third, was the politicization and corruption of the Integrity Commission a governing fourth, turning the judiciary unfortunately the power of the independent authority controlled by politicians in many cases, a governing V, was to disable the oversight role of Parliament which govern the sixth, were exceeded the powers of the president by the prime minister Fathtm governing VII, and the law seemed to be seen What interests him as it is compatible with the interests of work was done, and what has not been consistent Iike overlook him, and enough to look at government applications and the position of the political parties of the law of accountability and justice to know the truth of this matter which is governing the eighth .. And many others.
Therefore, the process of change regardless of the orientation will lead to new conflict for the lack of everyone to the mechanisms governing the Tnazaahm, and the nature of the atmosphere of mistrust when it dominated the political landscape, the need for a systems of conflict resolution that we have mentioned will be extremely sensitive and important, and therefore the numbers you remember for a no-confidence no matter what he is talking about the credibility of the parties to the conflict which will result in the context of scales close to each other, but they Ptdhad fierce.
Which means that the vote of no confidence the government will put us in front of two options may not lead to the formation of a new government, which makes the Government of Mr. Maliki's caretaker government and thus make them more aggressive in skipping the rest of the Noazem officer, which will ignite the conflict of what is deeper than it is now, and with it, what wanted to get rid of it the party that wants to be withheld will be located in the worst of it, even if it did not do it will be very weak.
May lead the process of no-confidence to form a new government, but it would be the other weak two reasons first, no time to have even if they are at the top of integrity and strength to find a reform movement, it is also Sinhishha struggle certainty with the balance remaining of the balance of power that will be affected by the new government, even if add to that the large residual debris from the previous government, the problem Sttbdy more pronounced.
The fail-confidence motion which will give Mr. Maliki and his courage to overcome the greater the forces that Nahith Throughout this period, and then to open an era of greater intensity in the conflict may be alarming to all the major dangers of Iraq.
No solution in my opinion is only through understanding a serious and responsible to return to the control systems of conflicts, respect and restore confidence to them, and with it the problem will not be those who will chair or govern as long as there is a ceiling is not allowed to authoritarianism or autocracy.
I am well aware that the attainment of this is like the impossible within the current circumstances, and for this Amdna to a policy of mitigation of damage to people, because the damage is located on the people in all situations, and what concerns us how to temper them, what is the largest, in addition to that, such as this could eventually lead to a better atmosphere to the Government the next election if the electoral system remained in place, and in the heart of that great doubt.
I think that the conflicting parties have committed serious errors against their people and their interests, and significantly above the Constitution, even if we heard that the agreement was in it Erbil violation of the Constitution Vtm repudiated him, where he was Vlamra Almtfqon about it on that agreed? This Agreement is the form of government without which we would not see any government, and therefore the point of harm reduction potential to move the implementation of the agreement, not because we believe in this agreement, we were not partners in it, was next to us ourselves with him, and confirmed at the time that the government, when formed in this way will be a government crisis, not a government solution, and the Government of the conflict and not of stability, and the vision from the beginning talking about the error of such agreements, but where it was agreed between the parties, they have to fulfill the obligations of their agreement this, or baptize the new agreements, as this would bridge of trust between the Parties that meet the hard currency lost between the conflicting parties.
It was the Supreme Council of the victim only to form a government according to the conventions of Arbil, the declared and confidentiality, and throughout this period were accused of a lot that our main concern is to overthrow the government of Maliki and the wronged greatly by the parties to it has done is a complete injustice, but it has become clear today that our approach from the outset was based on basis to proceed with political stability, forward Boaqaaat policy does not slogans and Mzaidadtha and disarm mines in front of the integration of the roles of the opponents of this process, and our final is nothing new when compared to our previous very point is that it is manifested today better and clearer, but this did not accept all the temptations presented to us that period or in these days, the situation is not suitable for the spoils and gains, to the extent requires payment of the terrible damage that can result in conflicts today.
As is our call yesterday, we still call a couple of adventure by the parties to bridge the trust between them even if it leads to some decline, and must be signs of good faith, despite what seems to me that it was too late to like it, but it is bold initiatives that are built upon to project a return to dialogue, a task all parties, have been made on the leadership of the Supreme Council for the great efforts of bridging the gap between the parties, but the crisis is still intractable.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
