Home
Financial Times: America's adversaries only beneficiaries of the invasion of Iraq
2013-03-09 19:29:02
The future of Iraq / follow-up said British writer David Gardner The influence of the United States take to fade in Iraq, although only beneficiaries after ten years of the invasion of Iraq are sought coalition forces to defeat in 2003, representatives of the Iraqis themselves, and in Iran and the forces and manifestations and consequences of another. The writer explained in an article published by the newspaper "Financial Times" British that Iraq remains a topic that raises deep controversy after ten years of the former U.S. President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair launched their war illegal and false. He added that the goal of their war on Iraq was to overthrow Saddam Hussein, and reshape the Middle East according to ترويجهما war option in that period. He is no doubt that the United States has a great military power and unique, but the invasion of Iraq showed real doubts inside the U.S. and in the world as well, in that the United States can employ this power efficiently to reshape disaster events. The Gardner that the biggest proof of the inability of America to employ force possessed by efficiently is puzzling U.S. about arming the "rebels" Syrians, adding that when he starts historians left Date period after the Cold War, and the survival of the unipolar world, they certainly will point to Iraq Specifically to the sinking of the colonists in the Iraqi quagmire. He said that the coalition occupying Iraq have upset the balance of power in the region most acceptable for ignition in the world, he said, adding that the coalition authority dismantled "Saddam's Iraq," which was a threat to the West's allies in the region representatives in Israel and the Gulf. The writer added that the greatest impact of the invasion of Iraq by coalition is in receipt of the Shiite minority at the level of the Islamic world, or constitute a majority in Iraq to power in the state in the heart of the Arab world since the fall of the Fatimid caliphate in 1171. Gardner said the invasion also led to a sectarian bloodbath in Iraq, and warned of renewed sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites and بانتشاره to the Levant, the Gulf and across the Indian subcontinent. He added that the attack west of Iraq, and although it was a blow strong in the "war on terror", has led to the spread of intolerance of anti-Western and the growing "jihad" against the Christian West fueled by al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, and to strengthen the role of what he called بالثيوقراطية aggressive In Iran, as a beneficiary of the invasion. As noted by a number of variables and events in the region and considered the result of the invasion of Iraq, including the 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel, and the Iranian threat to Israel, and the conflict in Syria, and said that the invasion of Iraq remains an event symbolizing the waning power and influence of the U.S. in the region whole. As for Iraq itself, Fajtaatm by saying that the Iraqis have shown Hjaashh and patience is ordinary, and they are making their way back to normal life, even though they find themselves caught between what he described as "authoritarian government" of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and the anvil bloody attacks "terrorist", which demonstrates the failure of the colonists and drowned in the Iraqi quagmire.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
