Home
Some of the “secrets” of “oil deal” deal between Baghdad and Erbil
Wednesday, 10 December, 2014
Washington: detection US report, that the oil deal, which sparked a lot of controversy about what it is, and the “winner” and “loser” in it, it was not a road map for “wealth sharing” between Baghdad and Erbil, but it is a process of “saving” for both sides in stage where scarce resources, where and require more money to strengthen the Iraqi security forces and the Peshmerga forces, which are cooperating now on the defeat of the “Islamic State”, especially in the context of an American concept that the liberation of Nineveh-even if begun within a month features the it the whole process will need to a long time probably continue until the middle of next year.
He says political analyst Michael Knights in an extensive study presented by the Washington Institute: We also deal came against the backdrop of a very difficult financial circumstances in Iraq caused by falling oil prices. It is noteworthy that the arrangements that resulted from the talks is foremost a deal based on “revenue generation” rather than a standing agreement on the “revenue sharing” because the wording has been carefully only in order to generate new revenue for both Baghdad and the Kurds.
In the opinion of the expert, The draft agreement, which was announced in December 2, “represents a courageous step” by Dr. Haider Abadi, the prime minister, and Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan region, which Ihzian support and oil ministers, Adel Abdul-Mahdi of the federal Iraqi government and drastically by the Kurds. And confirms the Knights, it is possible that the parties used the agreement selfish way to ease the financial and political pressures in the short term without any real commitment to implement the agreement through 2015.
stresses US expert to say, in case it was agreed unpopular and has been applied, you can see some very positive results resulting from the process of signing a deal to increase revenues to the fullest extent and share in 2015. It will export 550 thousand barrels of oil a day to support the war in Iraq and the economy, which is heavily fatigued economy. It can strengthen cooperation in the fight against al «Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant» to the fullest extent, and to improve the restoration of federal and Kurdish connector governments in the first half of 2015 jobs.
Consequently -isttrd Michael Nayats- may lead not only to the survival of the fabric of the main Iraqi society together but to strengthen it through a successful experiment in power-sharing between the spectra of society. As oil minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi said in a “top of the Atlantic Council” in Istanbul on November 20: “Since the establishment of Iraq’s oil and a cause of wars and conflicts, and now we want to be the cause of peace and cooperation.”
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Wednesday, 10 December, 2014
Washington: detection US report, that the oil deal, which sparked a lot of controversy about what it is, and the “winner” and “loser” in it, it was not a road map for “wealth sharing” between Baghdad and Erbil, but it is a process of “saving” for both sides in stage where scarce resources, where and require more money to strengthen the Iraqi security forces and the Peshmerga forces, which are cooperating now on the defeat of the “Islamic State”, especially in the context of an American concept that the liberation of Nineveh-even if begun within a month features the it the whole process will need to a long time probably continue until the middle of next year.
He says political analyst Michael Knights in an extensive study presented by the Washington Institute: We also deal came against the backdrop of a very difficult financial circumstances in Iraq caused by falling oil prices. It is noteworthy that the arrangements that resulted from the talks is foremost a deal based on “revenue generation” rather than a standing agreement on the “revenue sharing” because the wording has been carefully only in order to generate new revenue for both Baghdad and the Kurds.
In the opinion of the expert, The draft agreement, which was announced in December 2, “represents a courageous step” by Dr. Haider Abadi, the prime minister, and Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan region, which Ihzian support and oil ministers, Adel Abdul-Mahdi of the federal Iraqi government and drastically by the Kurds. And confirms the Knights, it is possible that the parties used the agreement selfish way to ease the financial and political pressures in the short term without any real commitment to implement the agreement through 2015.
stresses US expert to say, in case it was agreed unpopular and has been applied, you can see some very positive results resulting from the process of signing a deal to increase revenues to the fullest extent and share in 2015. It will export 550 thousand barrels of oil a day to support the war in Iraq and the economy, which is heavily fatigued economy. It can strengthen cooperation in the fight against al «Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant» to the fullest extent, and to improve the restoration of federal and Kurdish connector governments in the first half of 2015 jobs.
Consequently -isttrd Michael Nayats- may lead not only to the survival of the fabric of the main Iraqi society together but to strengthen it through a successful experiment in power-sharing between the spectra of society. As oil minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi said in a “top of the Atlantic Council” in Istanbul on November 20: “Since the establishment of Iraq’s oil and a cause of wars and conflicts, and now we want to be the cause of peace and cooperation.”
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
