Home
Federal Court: Replace the House of Representatives issued decisions in accordance with the law, taking into account the will of the voter
2/26/15
(Independent) .. Federal Supreme Court affirmed that the decisions regarding the replacement of members of the House of Representatives issued in accordance with the law, noting that it respected the will of the voters, according to the Constitution.
The judge said Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar The official spokesman for the federal judiciary, "the Federal Supreme Court applied the provisions of the replacement of the members of the House of Representatives Law No. (6) of the year 2006".
He added Bayraktar, "it was bound by the provisions of this law Balzom be replaced by the same entity and to maintain and application of Article (2/2) of it."
He pointed out that "Law No. (6) omitted how to choose a variant of the entity so I went the Federal Supreme Court in its decisions to implement the provisions of the House of Representatives Election Law No. (45) for the year 2013 which was released later the Law replace members of the House."
He cautioned the official spokesman that "the law (45) draw how solutions when the vacancy one House seats and took into account the text of the articles (20) and (38 / I) of the Constitution in the form in which it respects the opinion of voters," referring to that "legislation complement each other if found shortage in one of them. "
As pointed out that "Members replace a law passed in a system (closed list) that was head of the list is determined by the selection paths without controls," stressed that "the recent elections were held under a system (open list) that takes into account the desire of voters one who wants to."
And increased Birqadr "who gets the most votes is to be developed regardless of the opinion and the desire of the President of the list," Msttrda "according to the orientation of the Federal Legislative subsequent Supreme Court rulings in the field of replacement."
"Is predominantly opinion Chairman entity when replacement alone in choosing alternative or there needs to be a governor in his choices," explaining that "in the introduction, the number of votes obtained by the candidate and the need to respect the opinion of the majority of voters at the choice."
Seal and official spokesman for the judiciary said, "Would not the court's decision gives the president of the entity and the entity itself more popular if he chose (The Biggest Loser) alternative?"
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
