Home
Abdul-Mahdi: The Federal House of Representatives to reconsider its legislative role
4/20/2015
{Baghdad: Euphrates News}, leader of the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, said on Monday that the Federal Court decision and clear a large reduction in re-legislative role of the House of Representatives, noting that "this decision removes a lot of confusion and ambiguity of the roles of the various authorities."
Said Abdul-Mahdi said in a statement issued by the Information Office Agency {Euphrates News} received a copy of it today that he "has been a long debate about the proposed law, and it's just an idea, and he was not entitled to the House of Representatives to legislate unless provided by the executive branch as a bill, which disrupted the legislative role of the Council of House of Representatives, and make it a follower of the executive power, stalling the laws and became the country managed orders to Adsturih and Amassatah, and policies of the status quo, and the conflict between the authorities and disable each other, without a final reference to resolve things, while the constitutional system is based on that Iraq is a country republican, democratic, pluralistic, decentralized The federal-federal. "
He said the "political system is a representative parliamentary system based on the separation of legislative, executive and judicial powers, has said the Federal Court's decision to clear a significant reduction in re role of legislation the House of Representatives, saying that" the legislature exercise its functions and powers provided for in Articles {60.61, 62 64 / I} of the Constitution, and in the introduction of these tasks do legislation federal laws required by the public interest and in accordance with the constitutional contexts. "
He added, "The exercise of this jurisdiction and competence necessary to be mindful of the principle of separation of powers, which passed referred to, and not be among the laws that Icheraha House of Representatives directly affects this principle, and those laws that affect this principle are the laws that resulted in financial obligations on power Executive were not included in the plans or in the financial budget without consultation with and obtain approval for this, as well as laws that are inconsistent with the ministerial program, which the ministry won the House of Representatives confidence Kan, as well as not to be an urgent functions of the judiciary without consulting with them because the contradiction to the principle of independence elimination .. etc. ".
He pointed out that "This decision removes a lot of confusion and ambiguity of the roles of the various authorities, and confirms that the House can cross the proposed law to legitimize laws, except with prejudice the independence of the judiciary or in financial matters without the consent of the executive branch, or contrary to the ministerial curriculum," noting that " This is an important development, perhaps will restore the centrality of the House of Representatives in the political system, and allows him to liquidate the contradictions between inherited the laws and the Constitution, as it is important to give legitimacy to quite a few of the laws issued by the House of Representatives, including the third term and the provinces and other law. "
He continued, "We do not believe that the conflict or the chaos Sizulan completely .. but this decision made clear beyond any doubt a reference the House of Representatives as a hub of the political system, and explained that the Constitution will remain ink on paper that did not legitimize the laws that airs blood in it, and that the legislative and executive branches are responsible all laws through legislation proposed laws and bills approved by the House of Representatives in the end, and that the laws will turn materials are subject to different interpretations between departments and authorities and interpretations, what has not issued in accordance with the instructions of the body that assigned the same law ".anthy
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
4/20/2015
{Baghdad: Euphrates News}, leader of the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, said on Monday that the Federal Court decision and clear a large reduction in re-legislative role of the House of Representatives, noting that "this decision removes a lot of confusion and ambiguity of the roles of the various authorities."
Said Abdul-Mahdi said in a statement issued by the Information Office Agency {Euphrates News} received a copy of it today that he "has been a long debate about the proposed law, and it's just an idea, and he was not entitled to the House of Representatives to legislate unless provided by the executive branch as a bill, which disrupted the legislative role of the Council of House of Representatives, and make it a follower of the executive power, stalling the laws and became the country managed orders to Adsturih and Amassatah, and policies of the status quo, and the conflict between the authorities and disable each other, without a final reference to resolve things, while the constitutional system is based on that Iraq is a country republican, democratic, pluralistic, decentralized The federal-federal. "
He said the "political system is a representative parliamentary system based on the separation of legislative, executive and judicial powers, has said the Federal Court's decision to clear a significant reduction in re role of legislation the House of Representatives, saying that" the legislature exercise its functions and powers provided for in Articles {60.61, 62 64 / I} of the Constitution, and in the introduction of these tasks do legislation federal laws required by the public interest and in accordance with the constitutional contexts. "
He added, "The exercise of this jurisdiction and competence necessary to be mindful of the principle of separation of powers, which passed referred to, and not be among the laws that Icheraha House of Representatives directly affects this principle, and those laws that affect this principle are the laws that resulted in financial obligations on power Executive were not included in the plans or in the financial budget without consultation with and obtain approval for this, as well as laws that are inconsistent with the ministerial program, which the ministry won the House of Representatives confidence Kan, as well as not to be an urgent functions of the judiciary without consulting with them because the contradiction to the principle of independence elimination .. etc. ".
He pointed out that "This decision removes a lot of confusion and ambiguity of the roles of the various authorities, and confirms that the House can cross the proposed law to legitimize laws, except with prejudice the independence of the judiciary or in financial matters without the consent of the executive branch, or contrary to the ministerial curriculum," noting that " This is an important development, perhaps will restore the centrality of the House of Representatives in the political system, and allows him to liquidate the contradictions between inherited the laws and the Constitution, as it is important to give legitimacy to quite a few of the laws issued by the House of Representatives, including the third term and the provinces and other law. "
He continued, "We do not believe that the conflict or the chaos Sizulan completely .. but this decision made clear beyond any doubt a reference the House of Representatives as a hub of the political system, and explained that the Constitution will remain ink on paper that did not legitimize the laws that airs blood in it, and that the legislative and executive branches are responsible all laws through legislation proposed laws and bills approved by the House of Representatives in the end, and that the laws will turn materials are subject to different interpretations between departments and authorities and interpretations, what has not issued in accordance with the instructions of the body that assigned the same law ".anthy
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
