Home
Parliamentary Legal reveal the most prominent differences on the draft of the Federal Court Act
05/04/2015
Khandan - Legal Committee in the House of Representatives revealed, for the most prominent project of the Federal Supreme Court of items, pointing out that some of the texts are still the subject of controversy and left decisively to a vote within the parliament, as pointed out that future meetings will see the second reading of the draft, and are expected to pass through the legislative term current. The committee member said Salim Chawki, said that "our committee met on Sunday to discuss the draft of the Federal Supreme Court items have been taken proposals of the political blocs and degree within the current draft." He said Shawki in an interview with the newspaper "New Morning" that "the project, consisting of 24 articles was lifted to the Presidency of the Council of Representatives to put on the agenda. " He called "House Speaker Salim al to hold a meeting with parliamentary faction leaders to agree on a law passed; it need the approval of two-thirds of the members to complete the project and the items separately as well." He went on Shawki that " a number of articles still contentious and left to vote, the first of a number of Muslim Jurists, part of the crew of the 11-member court. " He added, "There is an opinion that the number of jurists two, in addition to two law professors, as goes another view to increase the jurists of four to be the number of members of the Court of non-judges 6 against 5 judges. " It was to be "the second dispute revolves around the dependency of this court there are those who go to it an independent body, and the opinion of another with Drjha within the federal judiciary components and vested in the President of this power." As for the survival of President of the Court in office is the other has not been agreed upon, Shawki reported that "the draft submitted will be for 12 years, that the current president remains (Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud) in office for two years after the entry into force of the law in order to prepares things for his successor." He went on, "the opinions of others to reduce service to only 6 years, but there are objections to this trend; because it is a short period of not commensurate with the nature of judicial work. " As the dispute included According to Shawki decision-making mechanism within the Court "with the first opinion to be a two-thirds majority, while others asked that up to 3/4 in matters of a religious nature in order to be taking the votes of Muslim Jurists. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
05/04/2015
Khandan - Legal Committee in the House of Representatives revealed, for the most prominent project of the Federal Supreme Court of items, pointing out that some of the texts are still the subject of controversy and left decisively to a vote within the parliament, as pointed out that future meetings will see the second reading of the draft, and are expected to pass through the legislative term current. The committee member said Salim Chawki, said that "our committee met on Sunday to discuss the draft of the Federal Supreme Court items have been taken proposals of the political blocs and degree within the current draft." He said Shawki in an interview with the newspaper "New Morning" that "the project, consisting of 24 articles was lifted to the Presidency of the Council of Representatives to put on the agenda. " He called "House Speaker Salim al to hold a meeting with parliamentary faction leaders to agree on a law passed; it need the approval of two-thirds of the members to complete the project and the items separately as well." He went on Shawki that " a number of articles still contentious and left to vote, the first of a number of Muslim Jurists, part of the crew of the 11-member court. " He added, "There is an opinion that the number of jurists two, in addition to two law professors, as goes another view to increase the jurists of four to be the number of members of the Court of non-judges 6 against 5 judges. " It was to be "the second dispute revolves around the dependency of this court there are those who go to it an independent body, and the opinion of another with Drjha within the federal judiciary components and vested in the President of this power." As for the survival of President of the Court in office is the other has not been agreed upon, Shawki reported that "the draft submitted will be for 12 years, that the current president remains (Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud) in office for two years after the entry into force of the law in order to prepares things for his successor." He went on, "the opinions of others to reduce service to only 6 years, but there are objections to this trend; because it is a short period of not commensurate with the nature of judicial work. " As the dispute included According to Shawki decision-making mechanism within the Court "with the first opinion to be a two-thirds majority, while others asked that up to 3/4 in matters of a religious nature in order to be taking the votes of Muslim Jurists. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
