Home
Mr. Ambassador of the United States of America: Are you with us or against us?
5/12/15
BAGHDAD / Obelisk: It takes a lot of Iraqis in decoding the mysteries of American attitudes, "Blur" toward Iraq, it appeared to describe Washington's policy toward Baghdad, as "volatile" and "non-critical" is true to the extent that some people go on to say, that Washington was ready even Cooperation with Daash terrorist organization, to keep on its interests and its allies.
On this basis, Iraqis can find guidance letter in this regard to the US ambassador in Iraq, a must to clarify the confusion, disengagement of concepts.
In a short period, and Washington opened its doors for both promotes the idea of dividing Iraq, through official visits such as visiting Massoud Barzani to Washington, and the launch of a project "an independent Kurdish State" and "the Kurdish new army equipped with the latest types of weapons", or through the reception Iraqi politicians They knew either their support of terrorism, such as Issawi, or Liberation of Iraq, which hover suspicions caused by the fall of Mosul, and launch sectarian remarks and racism that makes him persona non "decent," in any genuine political process if applied ethical standards in politics and sociology, but he is not worthy Ban called from a professional and solid research centers, to discuss the internal affairs of Iraq.
Perhaps the most important question the Iraqis addressed to the US ambassador in Baghdad, is about US scrambling toward Sunni and separatist symbols with miss any Shiite party influential, politically it or intellectually on the agenda of US calls on the official level, or at the level of research and academies in thought and policy centers.
After all these political maneuvers that do not fit with the stated US policy to support the Iraqi government, it is our right to believe what borne armed factions in the popular crowd that US aircraft supplying armed organizations in the desert of Ramadi and other areas, aid.
On Sunday, leading the crowd in the popular forces, revealed by an international coalition led by the United States aircraft, pounding pieces of the Iraqi army in Al-Anbar, which led to the martyrdom and wounding dozens of them.
There is no doubt that the cause of many of these American attitudes, politeness Washington regional feelings in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Gulf countries Washington is keen to "milking" financially, Vtmaliha in attitudes, because what these countries portray Iraq has been a "Shiite entity" continued to Iran, and that he at the center is not consistent with US interests and the Gulf despite the rush to satisfy the Iraqi government and Washington, Riyadh and Doha, to the beat of a pipe dream in these countries changed their policies towards Iraq.
The defect, that a superpower, is going today, along the lines of sectarian politicians portrayed Gulf states, motivated by money and arms deals that yield on the US Treasury Trionat of dollars.
The United States has said it formed an alliance to fight Daash, but this project resulted in a "rat", not the number of sorties "states" beyond alliances invasive missions here and there, and it seems the coalition in reality is not directed against Daash but against any Shiite organization in Inside Iraq, bombing targets factions crowd herbal, or in the outside while non Compass objectives towards Yemen.
The question here is cooked to the US ambassador in Iraq, are you with us or against us?
It is a legitimate question, when it appeared that Washington canceled the war on terror in Iraq from the lexicon, except to the extent that covers the premeditated intentions.
The defect, that a superpower, is going today, along the lines of sectarian politicians portrayed Gulf states, motivated by money and arms deals that yield on the US Treasury Trionat of dollars.
Perhaps the US ambassador in Iraq, understands better than anyone else, that Baghdad has responded enough pressure and conditions, and reluctantly accepted the assignment so much known for its support of terror groups, but without taking Mkaspa remember.
Washington has not done so far, what contributes seriously in the liberation of Mosul and Anbar, except for a few raids in paid from Iraq week, and did not do what needs to be done in Salah al-Din, but it criticized the participation of factions of the popular crowd, motivated by sectarian hatred Asamatha Gulf states to the ears of Washington. .
Baghdad has responded desired change of government, which marketed and Washington, and gave up a lot of conditions in favor of the Kurds and other political parties.
To the extent that "pampered" the Gulf states and Washington (three Gulf leaders will not meet the Obama invitation to Camp David), complains Washington from Baghdad, and the reason for that which has not been declared by Washington officially, but talking about, and confirmed by research from the centers that Washington had and the pressures of Gulf funds It is satisfied that Iraq "Shiite system" is going on in Iran's orbit, to the extent that the US among adopt what he said Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, the former of "The Washington handed over Baghdad to Tehran on a plate."
If the United States is keen on relations with the Gulf States, and undertake to protect it from any external threat, why do not adhere to the strategic framework agreement with Iraq, where under which pledged to provide assistance to Iraq in the security, political, economic, social and cultural fields and even environmental.
Baghdad has responded desired change of government, which marketed and Washington, and gave up a lot of conditions in favor of the Kurds and other political parties.
The strength of nations lies in imposing its will, when I felt the Gulf States that the nuclear deal threatened, fired pressure on the Washington signals in order to clarify its position and renewed its pledge to protect the Gulf while the Iraqi government is in all positions "Msaash" and is in defiance of the positions and Washington had as if they feared the absence of punishment for Americans.
Then, the United States did not trust the efforts of the Iraqi government in reconciliation and the fight against terrorism, and calls to marginalize the role of factions of the popular crowd, and why dialogue politicians accused of terrorism or separatist and invite them which had, and vowing money and weapons in the Baghdad government in a nap what is going on around them.
That Iraq today that takes advantage of important geo-strategic, economic, and attached to US interests them, but it be taken advantage of its relationship with Iran and reinforced to form the axis along with Iran and Syria, bow to him the United States as the bow of the Gulf axis, and that Iraq's leaders their terms clear to Washington that they have in to become a strategic ally with strong, they are not always ready, because the conditions imposed on them.
Let the polarization direction of Baghdad, not her, and it was not only to achieve military gains on the ground, and make it clear to the parties home and abroad that the Iraqi government will not compromise on national principles of sovereignty and wealth, then you will understand Barzani and al-Issawi and Najafi, that playing outside Iraq circuit forbidden, because there are Iraqi law apply to everyone, it does not allow maneuvers which destabilize national security.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
5/12/15
BAGHDAD / Obelisk: It takes a lot of Iraqis in decoding the mysteries of American attitudes, "Blur" toward Iraq, it appeared to describe Washington's policy toward Baghdad, as "volatile" and "non-critical" is true to the extent that some people go on to say, that Washington was ready even Cooperation with Daash terrorist organization, to keep on its interests and its allies.
On this basis, Iraqis can find guidance letter in this regard to the US ambassador in Iraq, a must to clarify the confusion, disengagement of concepts.
In a short period, and Washington opened its doors for both promotes the idea of dividing Iraq, through official visits such as visiting Massoud Barzani to Washington, and the launch of a project "an independent Kurdish State" and "the Kurdish new army equipped with the latest types of weapons", or through the reception Iraqi politicians They knew either their support of terrorism, such as Issawi, or Liberation of Iraq, which hover suspicions caused by the fall of Mosul, and launch sectarian remarks and racism that makes him persona non "decent," in any genuine political process if applied ethical standards in politics and sociology, but he is not worthy Ban called from a professional and solid research centers, to discuss the internal affairs of Iraq.
Perhaps the most important question the Iraqis addressed to the US ambassador in Baghdad, is about US scrambling toward Sunni and separatist symbols with miss any Shiite party influential, politically it or intellectually on the agenda of US calls on the official level, or at the level of research and academies in thought and policy centers.
After all these political maneuvers that do not fit with the stated US policy to support the Iraqi government, it is our right to believe what borne armed factions in the popular crowd that US aircraft supplying armed organizations in the desert of Ramadi and other areas, aid.
On Sunday, leading the crowd in the popular forces, revealed by an international coalition led by the United States aircraft, pounding pieces of the Iraqi army in Al-Anbar, which led to the martyrdom and wounding dozens of them.
There is no doubt that the cause of many of these American attitudes, politeness Washington regional feelings in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Gulf countries Washington is keen to "milking" financially, Vtmaliha in attitudes, because what these countries portray Iraq has been a "Shiite entity" continued to Iran, and that he at the center is not consistent with US interests and the Gulf despite the rush to satisfy the Iraqi government and Washington, Riyadh and Doha, to the beat of a pipe dream in these countries changed their policies towards Iraq.
The defect, that a superpower, is going today, along the lines of sectarian politicians portrayed Gulf states, motivated by money and arms deals that yield on the US Treasury Trionat of dollars.
The United States has said it formed an alliance to fight Daash, but this project resulted in a "rat", not the number of sorties "states" beyond alliances invasive missions here and there, and it seems the coalition in reality is not directed against Daash but against any Shiite organization in Inside Iraq, bombing targets factions crowd herbal, or in the outside while non Compass objectives towards Yemen.
The question here is cooked to the US ambassador in Iraq, are you with us or against us?
It is a legitimate question, when it appeared that Washington canceled the war on terror in Iraq from the lexicon, except to the extent that covers the premeditated intentions.
The defect, that a superpower, is going today, along the lines of sectarian politicians portrayed Gulf states, motivated by money and arms deals that yield on the US Treasury Trionat of dollars.
Perhaps the US ambassador in Iraq, understands better than anyone else, that Baghdad has responded enough pressure and conditions, and reluctantly accepted the assignment so much known for its support of terror groups, but without taking Mkaspa remember.
Washington has not done so far, what contributes seriously in the liberation of Mosul and Anbar, except for a few raids in paid from Iraq week, and did not do what needs to be done in Salah al-Din, but it criticized the participation of factions of the popular crowd, motivated by sectarian hatred Asamatha Gulf states to the ears of Washington. .
Baghdad has responded desired change of government, which marketed and Washington, and gave up a lot of conditions in favor of the Kurds and other political parties.
To the extent that "pampered" the Gulf states and Washington (three Gulf leaders will not meet the Obama invitation to Camp David), complains Washington from Baghdad, and the reason for that which has not been declared by Washington officially, but talking about, and confirmed by research from the centers that Washington had and the pressures of Gulf funds It is satisfied that Iraq "Shiite system" is going on in Iran's orbit, to the extent that the US among adopt what he said Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, the former of "The Washington handed over Baghdad to Tehran on a plate."
If the United States is keen on relations with the Gulf States, and undertake to protect it from any external threat, why do not adhere to the strategic framework agreement with Iraq, where under which pledged to provide assistance to Iraq in the security, political, economic, social and cultural fields and even environmental.
Baghdad has responded desired change of government, which marketed and Washington, and gave up a lot of conditions in favor of the Kurds and other political parties.
The strength of nations lies in imposing its will, when I felt the Gulf States that the nuclear deal threatened, fired pressure on the Washington signals in order to clarify its position and renewed its pledge to protect the Gulf while the Iraqi government is in all positions "Msaash" and is in defiance of the positions and Washington had as if they feared the absence of punishment for Americans.
Then, the United States did not trust the efforts of the Iraqi government in reconciliation and the fight against terrorism, and calls to marginalize the role of factions of the popular crowd, and why dialogue politicians accused of terrorism or separatist and invite them which had, and vowing money and weapons in the Baghdad government in a nap what is going on around them.
That Iraq today that takes advantage of important geo-strategic, economic, and attached to US interests them, but it be taken advantage of its relationship with Iran and reinforced to form the axis along with Iran and Syria, bow to him the United States as the bow of the Gulf axis, and that Iraq's leaders their terms clear to Washington that they have in to become a strategic ally with strong, they are not always ready, because the conditions imposed on them.
Let the polarization direction of Baghdad, not her, and it was not only to achieve military gains on the ground, and make it clear to the parties home and abroad that the Iraqi government will not compromise on national principles of sovereignty and wealth, then you will understand Barzani and al-Issawi and Najafi, that playing outside Iraq circuit forbidden, because there are Iraqi law apply to everyone, it does not allow maneuvers which destabilize national security.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
