Home
The government supports the resolution prepared by the Parliament and the confiscation of his right
7/9/2015 0:00
Accept the appeal additions budget raises controversy between the legislative and executive branches
Baghdad Alaa Taia- Omar Abdullatif
effects of the Federal Court's decision to accept the appeal cabinet material added by the House of Representatives on the state budget for the year 2015, the great debate between the government and the parliament, while the government supported the court's decision, which it called "Constitutional and positive," the parliament said the federal action "to confiscate the right of the Constitutional Council of Representatives and absolutely Walid government."
The Federal Supreme Court has declared Monday the unconstitutionality of a number of the financial budget for 2015 articles of the law as she said, "The House of Representatives has Pthariaha without returning to the government to take its approval or return the project to them to consider his proposals, "indicating that" the veto decision, "stressed that the preparation of the budget is the prerogative of the Council of Ministers and in accordance with the principle of the separation of powers provided for in Article 47 of the Constitution.
The government position appeared in officials statements who explained the "morning", said the government rejection came in principle as it is not entitled to the House of Representatives Add articles and paragraphs on the project, which sent the Cabinet being contrary to the Constitution and the general rules for the preparation of the budget and is considered an interference in private and that fiscal policy is in charge of the drawn is the Council of Ministers in accordance with Article 80 of the Constitution.
He said Deputy Secretary General of the Council of Ministers Obeid place: it is not the prerogative of the House of Representatives Add materials without referring to the Council of Ministers, and the limited role on the debate and amendment, and carry on the doors of the project according to the rules of procedure of the parliament, adding that the presence of judicial precedents in the past years, where was canceled materials for the budgets of several for the same reasons.
He replaced that "the abolition of some paragraphs and including Article 50 which identified central bank sales at 75 million dollars is a great importance because of its impact in promoting and supporting the independence of the Central Bank and its dimensions to influence policies and decisions," noting that "The decision has a positive impact in terms of sales returned to the position that it should be him and the abolition of paragraph Win central bank flexibility in supply and demand and sales." He stressed that the Federal Supreme Court's decision to accept the appeal submitted by the government on some of the paragraphs of the budget law "came accordance with the Constitution . "For his part, described the senior legal expert at the Ministry of State for Parliamentary Affairs, the Federal Court decision as "positive", especially since the changes made by the materials added by the House of Representatives confound Financial Action Task Force of the government and affected the economic work for the country in general. The official "The government's initiative to challenge paragraphs that were added to the budget for 2015 was to maintain the merits of the budget considering that the materials that were added in the parliament without reference to the Council of Ministers has affected negatively the economic and financial aspects." He said the budget for Athtml such details which is about "inputs and outputs "noting that the parliament Log in materials other than within the paragraphs of the budget in accordance with the general rules of the budgets in place, stressing that the decision of the Federal Court canceled paragraphs added to maintain the general principles for the preparation of the budget."The Parliament, he has expressed his opinion Abjahtin, first by the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives, which confirmed that the funds in the state budget and that the Federal Court has decided not to constitutionality materials will return to the pockets of the corrupt, while The Committee on the economy and parliamentary investment regret that the government resorted to consent to appeal the Federal Court to exclusivity Balaqrar.oukal committee member decisions Finance Jabbar al-Abadi told a news conference, attended by "morning", he "was on the court notes that the council cut the budget by nearly six trillion dinars after it saw that these expenditures are unnecessary, and that, in March his constitutional powers and held the reduction mentioned and transfers between chapters of the budget." he said, adding that the council when the application of the constitutional article and held a transaction in Article 4 of the budget bill came the decision to cancel that article, note that the government did not prove what is the fundamental change was the Constitution mention of the need to take the government a say in transfers. He added that what has Mnaqlth of amounts the doors of the budget and approve the disbursement enters the door of waste in public money that is transferred those amounts to the body the popular crowd and to the displaced and to veto these materials, those funds will go back into the pockets of the corrupt. " Abadi said the promise of the Federal Court decision this "issued right of Parliament Constitutional and fired by the government and the foundations of a new situation makes Parliament before the rejection option or acceptance of the law the next budget and what this repercussions on the development of the political and social country. " For its part, described the committee member Majda al-Tamimi these decisions to "strong blow" to the House of Representatives and the items added by the budget and which belong to the Iraqi people, saying that all of this is intended to "strengthen the corrupt," he Tobeirha.bdorha, vice chairman of the economic and investment commission parliamentary Nora Albjara: The government said in her appeal that resorted to the uniqueness of the decision. She said in a statement the "morning", that there are paragraphs of a task for the grades and install the contractors and the imposition of taxes on cigarettes and alcoholic beverages and the distribution of funds to displaced people who are in the tragedy and is not necessary in light of the increasing their numbers and high temperatures. She stressed that such decisions will affect the citizen are negative, suggesting that the Federal Court began tune the government in its decisions, although the House of Representatives has said those materials to improve the economic situation of the citizen. and hinted Albjara that the House of Representatives to take firm and decisive decision on the Government has taken decisions to the budget, expressing Amnyatea in the Federal Court to be fair in some materials that concern the citizen.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
7/9/2015 0:00
Accept the appeal additions budget raises controversy between the legislative and executive branches
Baghdad Alaa Taia- Omar Abdullatif
effects of the Federal Court's decision to accept the appeal cabinet material added by the House of Representatives on the state budget for the year 2015, the great debate between the government and the parliament, while the government supported the court's decision, which it called "Constitutional and positive," the parliament said the federal action "to confiscate the right of the Constitutional Council of Representatives and absolutely Walid government."
The Federal Supreme Court has declared Monday the unconstitutionality of a number of the financial budget for 2015 articles of the law as she said, "The House of Representatives has Pthariaha without returning to the government to take its approval or return the project to them to consider his proposals, "indicating that" the veto decision, "stressed that the preparation of the budget is the prerogative of the Council of Ministers and in accordance with the principle of the separation of powers provided for in Article 47 of the Constitution.
The government position appeared in officials statements who explained the "morning", said the government rejection came in principle as it is not entitled to the House of Representatives Add articles and paragraphs on the project, which sent the Cabinet being contrary to the Constitution and the general rules for the preparation of the budget and is considered an interference in private and that fiscal policy is in charge of the drawn is the Council of Ministers in accordance with Article 80 of the Constitution.
He said Deputy Secretary General of the Council of Ministers Obeid place: it is not the prerogative of the House of Representatives Add materials without referring to the Council of Ministers, and the limited role on the debate and amendment, and carry on the doors of the project according to the rules of procedure of the parliament, adding that the presence of judicial precedents in the past years, where was canceled materials for the budgets of several for the same reasons.
He replaced that "the abolition of some paragraphs and including Article 50 which identified central bank sales at 75 million dollars is a great importance because of its impact in promoting and supporting the independence of the Central Bank and its dimensions to influence policies and decisions," noting that "The decision has a positive impact in terms of sales returned to the position that it should be him and the abolition of paragraph Win central bank flexibility in supply and demand and sales." He stressed that the Federal Supreme Court's decision to accept the appeal submitted by the government on some of the paragraphs of the budget law "came accordance with the Constitution . "For his part, described the senior legal expert at the Ministry of State for Parliamentary Affairs, the Federal Court decision as "positive", especially since the changes made by the materials added by the House of Representatives confound Financial Action Task Force of the government and affected the economic work for the country in general. The official "The government's initiative to challenge paragraphs that were added to the budget for 2015 was to maintain the merits of the budget considering that the materials that were added in the parliament without reference to the Council of Ministers has affected negatively the economic and financial aspects." He said the budget for Athtml such details which is about "inputs and outputs "noting that the parliament Log in materials other than within the paragraphs of the budget in accordance with the general rules of the budgets in place, stressing that the decision of the Federal Court canceled paragraphs added to maintain the general principles for the preparation of the budget."The Parliament, he has expressed his opinion Abjahtin, first by the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives, which confirmed that the funds in the state budget and that the Federal Court has decided not to constitutionality materials will return to the pockets of the corrupt, while The Committee on the economy and parliamentary investment regret that the government resorted to consent to appeal the Federal Court to exclusivity Balaqrar.oukal committee member decisions Finance Jabbar al-Abadi told a news conference, attended by "morning", he "was on the court notes that the council cut the budget by nearly six trillion dinars after it saw that these expenditures are unnecessary, and that, in March his constitutional powers and held the reduction mentioned and transfers between chapters of the budget." he said, adding that the council when the application of the constitutional article and held a transaction in Article 4 of the budget bill came the decision to cancel that article, note that the government did not prove what is the fundamental change was the Constitution mention of the need to take the government a say in transfers. He added that what has Mnaqlth of amounts the doors of the budget and approve the disbursement enters the door of waste in public money that is transferred those amounts to the body the popular crowd and to the displaced and to veto these materials, those funds will go back into the pockets of the corrupt. " Abadi said the promise of the Federal Court decision this "issued right of Parliament Constitutional and fired by the government and the foundations of a new situation makes Parliament before the rejection option or acceptance of the law the next budget and what this repercussions on the development of the political and social country. " For its part, described the committee member Majda al-Tamimi these decisions to "strong blow" to the House of Representatives and the items added by the budget and which belong to the Iraqi people, saying that all of this is intended to "strengthen the corrupt," he Tobeirha.bdorha, vice chairman of the economic and investment commission parliamentary Nora Albjara: The government said in her appeal that resorted to the uniqueness of the decision. She said in a statement the "morning", that there are paragraphs of a task for the grades and install the contractors and the imposition of taxes on cigarettes and alcoholic beverages and the distribution of funds to displaced people who are in the tragedy and is not necessary in light of the increasing their numbers and high temperatures. She stressed that such decisions will affect the citizen are negative, suggesting that the Federal Court began tune the government in its decisions, although the House of Representatives has said those materials to improve the economic situation of the citizen. and hinted Albjara that the House of Representatives to take firm and decisive decision on the Government has taken decisions to the budget, expressing Amnyatea in the Federal Court to be fair in some materials that concern the citizen.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
