Why Iranian nuclear deal means for Iraq
Tuesday 28-07-2015
Twilight News / did not pass, but just a few hours after the announcement of the agreement, even hot Iraqis began their discussions on the subject in the streets, in the cafes and social networking forums, wondering Is betrayed the United States? Is Iran now will be able to intervene in Iraq without accountability.
Thus, with most of the issues related to the eastern neighbor, which shares borders with Iraq extends to 1,500 kilometers and the history of stained war, it came mixed reactions about the nuclear deal along ethnic and sectarian rifts in Iraqi society present lines.
Those who are with the agreement are mostly Shiite Muslims, intimating that a good relationship between Iran and the United States will improve the security situation in their country, where competition often contribute between agents American-backed year earlier and agents of Iran Shiites who have the support , creating a state of instability. And their discussion goes about things breakthrough between Iran and the United States-two of the strongest allies Arac- which would calm the sectarian strife and unite the resistance against the Islamic state.
Said Haider Kadhem, a shop owner in Karrada district, upscale central Baghdad, "I went to Tehran three months ago and I saw the suffering caused by the sanctions," he said, adding "We have made me remember causing problems because of the sanctions here in Iraq, where poverty, disease and lack of services, they are our neighbors and we are close to them, if they are in good condition then we will be in the event of Hassan.
But those opposed to the Ag- mostly Alsnh- Muslims argue that the deal gives Iran has the right to intervene in Iraq without any US opposition.
Said Safaa Abdel-Meguid, an employee of the Ministry of Electricity and lives in Saidiya district which is dominated by Sunnis south of Baghdad, "The nuclear deal is against the interests of Iraq," adding that "Iran and the United States alliance for the destruction of this country, and that Ali Khamenei told over and over again that his country's military intervention in Iraq will continue after the agreement.
Iranian nuclear deal has re also unpleasant memories for many Alaracaan- about the nuclear program begun by former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, in Facebook and on the tables of family dinner, cast those who are with the agreement of the charges against those who oppose it, accusing them of secret cooperation with Saudi Arabia and countries Arabian Gulf.
Said Majid Kazem professor of sociology and psychology, and lectured at the Universities of Baghdad, Mustansiriya "Every time there is a controversial topic like this, and the Iraqis stand with this party or that," he said, adding "they can not agree."
Nuclear deal also provided an opportunity for critics of the Iraqi government to vent what inside them on local politicians, especially Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a Shiite, for his performance poor in several areas - conflict over water with neighboring Turkey and the dispute over the Mubarak Al-Kabeer port Alkwyta- compared with the performance of the Iranian Foreign Minister Mohamed Javad Zarif, who is seen as the victor after nearly two years of long and difficult negotiations.
Most politicians have welcomed the high-level in Iraq to this agreement, despite the fact that some of their data was more muted than others.
Fuad Masum, the Iraqi president, has said, a Kurdish politician, told local media that "the agreement will help strengthen security and stability in the Middle East."
Said Iyad Allawi, one of three deputies to the president that he "Unfortunately, the agreement did not discuss the issue of respect for the sovereignty of other countries and Iranian interference in the region." In spite of the fact that Allawi, a Shiite, but he leans toward the secular lobby, a well-known hostility to Iran, but he said, "however, is still an important agreement" approved.
He described Nuri al-Maliki, a former prime minister and now vice president of the country to another, the agreement as "a victory for those who love peace in this region and in the world."And knew al-Maliki, at the end of last year his administration, having ties with Iran document.
The influential cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who leads the Sadrist movement derived its strength from millions of supporters, which was critical of Iran's policy towards Iraq in the recent past, it has declined to comment on the agreement.
Issued Ammar al-Hakim, a cleric and a peer-Sadr, and heads major Shi'ite political party is the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, said in a statement: "We congratulate the people of Iran noble and led the wise and his negotiators brave ... We believe that the nuclear deal the key to solving many of the thorniest problems in the region." .
In the long term, the agreement is expected to cast its impact on the Iraqi economy, by lowering world oil prices, which threatens financial challenges for the Iraqi government, which is the need to increase prices to overcome the current deficit in the budget.
Said Ahmed al-Alusi, a political analyst in Baghdad, said that "the talks focused on more than just the nuclear issue," adding, "We will know without a doubt .. whether the parties agreed to resolve other conflicts conciliatory manner, through negotiations, or what If they were simply going to stay with the status quo. "
Mustafa Habib Guardian / Tehran office
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Tuesday 28-07-2015
Twilight News / did not pass, but just a few hours after the announcement of the agreement, even hot Iraqis began their discussions on the subject in the streets, in the cafes and social networking forums, wondering Is betrayed the United States? Is Iran now will be able to intervene in Iraq without accountability.
Thus, with most of the issues related to the eastern neighbor, which shares borders with Iraq extends to 1,500 kilometers and the history of stained war, it came mixed reactions about the nuclear deal along ethnic and sectarian rifts in Iraqi society present lines.
Those who are with the agreement are mostly Shiite Muslims, intimating that a good relationship between Iran and the United States will improve the security situation in their country, where competition often contribute between agents American-backed year earlier and agents of Iran Shiites who have the support , creating a state of instability. And their discussion goes about things breakthrough between Iran and the United States-two of the strongest allies Arac- which would calm the sectarian strife and unite the resistance against the Islamic state.
Said Haider Kadhem, a shop owner in Karrada district, upscale central Baghdad, "I went to Tehran three months ago and I saw the suffering caused by the sanctions," he said, adding "We have made me remember causing problems because of the sanctions here in Iraq, where poverty, disease and lack of services, they are our neighbors and we are close to them, if they are in good condition then we will be in the event of Hassan.
But those opposed to the Ag- mostly Alsnh- Muslims argue that the deal gives Iran has the right to intervene in Iraq without any US opposition.
Said Safaa Abdel-Meguid, an employee of the Ministry of Electricity and lives in Saidiya district which is dominated by Sunnis south of Baghdad, "The nuclear deal is against the interests of Iraq," adding that "Iran and the United States alliance for the destruction of this country, and that Ali Khamenei told over and over again that his country's military intervention in Iraq will continue after the agreement.
Iranian nuclear deal has re also unpleasant memories for many Alaracaan- about the nuclear program begun by former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, in Facebook and on the tables of family dinner, cast those who are with the agreement of the charges against those who oppose it, accusing them of secret cooperation with Saudi Arabia and countries Arabian Gulf.
Said Majid Kazem professor of sociology and psychology, and lectured at the Universities of Baghdad, Mustansiriya "Every time there is a controversial topic like this, and the Iraqis stand with this party or that," he said, adding "they can not agree."
Nuclear deal also provided an opportunity for critics of the Iraqi government to vent what inside them on local politicians, especially Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a Shiite, for his performance poor in several areas - conflict over water with neighboring Turkey and the dispute over the Mubarak Al-Kabeer port Alkwyta- compared with the performance of the Iranian Foreign Minister Mohamed Javad Zarif, who is seen as the victor after nearly two years of long and difficult negotiations.
Most politicians have welcomed the high-level in Iraq to this agreement, despite the fact that some of their data was more muted than others.
Fuad Masum, the Iraqi president, has said, a Kurdish politician, told local media that "the agreement will help strengthen security and stability in the Middle East."
Said Iyad Allawi, one of three deputies to the president that he "Unfortunately, the agreement did not discuss the issue of respect for the sovereignty of other countries and Iranian interference in the region." In spite of the fact that Allawi, a Shiite, but he leans toward the secular lobby, a well-known hostility to Iran, but he said, "however, is still an important agreement" approved.
He described Nuri al-Maliki, a former prime minister and now vice president of the country to another, the agreement as "a victory for those who love peace in this region and in the world."And knew al-Maliki, at the end of last year his administration, having ties with Iran document.
The influential cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who leads the Sadrist movement derived its strength from millions of supporters, which was critical of Iran's policy towards Iraq in the recent past, it has declined to comment on the agreement.
Issued Ammar al-Hakim, a cleric and a peer-Sadr, and heads major Shi'ite political party is the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, said in a statement: "We congratulate the people of Iran noble and led the wise and his negotiators brave ... We believe that the nuclear deal the key to solving many of the thorniest problems in the region." .
In the long term, the agreement is expected to cast its impact on the Iraqi economy, by lowering world oil prices, which threatens financial challenges for the Iraqi government, which is the need to increase prices to overcome the current deficit in the budget.
Said Ahmed al-Alusi, a political analyst in Baghdad, said that "the talks focused on more than just the nuclear issue," adding, "We will know without a doubt .. whether the parties agreed to resolve other conflicts conciliatory manner, through negotiations, or what If they were simply going to stay with the status quo. "
Mustafa Habib Guardian / Tehran office
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]