Legal representative: the Kurdistan Alliance disrupts the Federal Mahmkh because of "interest"!
Since 10.19.2015
Stressed the Legal Committee member of the parliamentary sound Shawki, Monday, that the Kurdistan Alliance seeks to ensure not to proceed with any solution to the problems of contention between Baghdad and Erbil, nor in the interest of the region and that by insisting on their opinion on the Federal Court Act, revealed the existence of negotiations between the political blocs and the Kurdistan Alliance to resolve points of contention on this law.
Said Shawki's / scales News / "The political negotiations between the parliamentary and the Kurdistan coalition blocs to reach a solution points of contention in the Federal Court Act after he arrived at the stage of voting," noting that "the Federal Court Act a federal law passed in parliament needed to 219 voice what It requires the existence of an agreement to pass. "
He said the legal committee member of the parliamentary "The Kurdistan Alliance demands that be decisions of the Court of the Federal pass two thirds of the members of the Court vote because he fears that there will be differences between the center and the region and thus guarantee not to proceed with any solution that does not hurt in the Kurdistan interest," pointing to "We are against reforms and Federal Court Act of the most important reforms to develop the work of the judiciary. "
It is said that "a coalition of state law Mohammed Chihod charged, earlier, the Kurdistan Alliance to disrupt the passing of the Federal Court Act in the House of Representatives, as he emphasized that he was solving the problem of" scholars "Sharia".
The "coalition of Iraqi forces by Abdul Rahman Alloizi confirmed, earlier, that the reform of the Iraqi judiciary needs to be legislation of the Federal Court Act by the House of Representatives as soon as" .anthy 29/28
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Since 10.19.2015
Stressed the Legal Committee member of the parliamentary sound Shawki, Monday, that the Kurdistan Alliance seeks to ensure not to proceed with any solution to the problems of contention between Baghdad and Erbil, nor in the interest of the region and that by insisting on their opinion on the Federal Court Act, revealed the existence of negotiations between the political blocs and the Kurdistan Alliance to resolve points of contention on this law.
Said Shawki's / scales News / "The political negotiations between the parliamentary and the Kurdistan coalition blocs to reach a solution points of contention in the Federal Court Act after he arrived at the stage of voting," noting that "the Federal Court Act a federal law passed in parliament needed to 219 voice what It requires the existence of an agreement to pass. "
He said the legal committee member of the parliamentary "The Kurdistan Alliance demands that be decisions of the Court of the Federal pass two thirds of the members of the Court vote because he fears that there will be differences between the center and the region and thus guarantee not to proceed with any solution that does not hurt in the Kurdistan interest," pointing to "We are against reforms and Federal Court Act of the most important reforms to develop the work of the judiciary. "
It is said that "a coalition of state law Mohammed Chihod charged, earlier, the Kurdistan Alliance to disrupt the passing of the Federal Court Act in the House of Representatives, as he emphasized that he was solving the problem of" scholars "Sharia".
The "coalition of Iraqi forces by Abdul Rahman Alloizi confirmed, earlier, that the reform of the Iraqi judiciary needs to be legislation of the Federal Court Act by the House of Representatives as soon as" .anthy 29/28
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]