Home
War: the reference filed yesterday sword Parliament on the constitutionality of the government's reforms
2015/11/7
[Baghdad-where]
the legal expert Tareq Harb said, that the Supreme religious authority raised in her engagement enemas Friday sword Parliament on the constitutionality of the government's reforms. "
He said the war in a statement received by the agency all of Iraq [where] a copy of it, that it "can be regarded as the reference speech yesterday in Karbala, a quick response to the parliament's decision last week issued on reforms and condition of the constitution for it."
He added that "the speech reference corrected and corrected the statement in the parliament's decision or the extent of the decision identified at the very least that the decision was necessitated adoption of the Constitution as a basis for reforms in revenue is a [according to the Constitution in the first sentence of the text of the resolution.
"promised to support reference war yesterday of the reforms as" raise constitutional Lost Universe before the reform march led by Prime Minister to stop these reforms at least or scaled and finish off by private for the previous reforms if what has been the use of the term in accordance with the Constitution as a pretext for the decomposition of these reforms, considering that these reforms do not agree Constitution did not issue on accordance with the Constitution and therefore should be abolished and restore things to what they used to be before the reforms.
"He noted legal expert said that" In spite of the coupling of these reforms earlier with the consent of the parliament so came the Friday sermon [yesterday] minute statement, clarity and deep destination and goal when confirmed not to take the Constitution and the way to get around the reforms and not to exploit the Constitutional tracks and a way to circumvent the reforms ".
He said the war" was the engagement and clear in determining the Salutation, a Parliament that Parliament stop since the start of reforms, with the exception of its previous decision idly on these reforms, if not opposition indirect position given that he did not Atol legislation any law or decision to enter into the legislative competence includes a touch of reform while in the Constitution grants Parliament the authority to legislate the proposal to members as long as these laws do not represent a financial commitment on the budget.
"He argued that" all the laws that are issued under the reform package is a reduction of expenses and Aqlala for disbursements and therefore to Parliament as long as the constitution hand launched in the issuance of laws in this area of legislation these laws and not to stand on the sidelines and even the parliament, for example, did not issue a decision to reduce the allocation of Representatives and the staff of the parliament and reduce protections and reduce Alaivadat and unnecessary expenditure of the same salaries, but still waiting for what holds the government of taken while he had to take the initiative To make such a decision and without stop at Ray government and hold the government.
"He said," Parliament did not interact with the reform measures and even he did not take austerity and financial hardship into consideration when legislation laws of the financial commitments were on the government and sent by the government years ago when there was a financial and an abundance of That party, which was much on Parliament Cancel contained in this provision of law, which includes a load Treasury to provide subsidies to political parties law, especially if we know that Alvin person only Astrthm law so that the party is officially worth subsidy from the ministry.
"He stressed the legal expert that he" has to be for parliament Pay attention to this matter and the issue of reform laws on his own initiative without waiting for laws sent by the government to reform measures are calculated for the government and parliament and are not calculated only for the government but only the prime minister, as is happening now, ".anthy projects
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
2015/11/7
[Baghdad-where]
the legal expert Tareq Harb said, that the Supreme religious authority raised in her engagement enemas Friday sword Parliament on the constitutionality of the government's reforms. "
He said the war in a statement received by the agency all of Iraq [where] a copy of it, that it "can be regarded as the reference speech yesterday in Karbala, a quick response to the parliament's decision last week issued on reforms and condition of the constitution for it."
He added that "the speech reference corrected and corrected the statement in the parliament's decision or the extent of the decision identified at the very least that the decision was necessitated adoption of the Constitution as a basis for reforms in revenue is a [according to the Constitution in the first sentence of the text of the resolution.
"promised to support reference war yesterday of the reforms as" raise constitutional Lost Universe before the reform march led by Prime Minister to stop these reforms at least or scaled and finish off by private for the previous reforms if what has been the use of the term in accordance with the Constitution as a pretext for the decomposition of these reforms, considering that these reforms do not agree Constitution did not issue on accordance with the Constitution and therefore should be abolished and restore things to what they used to be before the reforms.
"He noted legal expert said that" In spite of the coupling of these reforms earlier with the consent of the parliament so came the Friday sermon [yesterday] minute statement, clarity and deep destination and goal when confirmed not to take the Constitution and the way to get around the reforms and not to exploit the Constitutional tracks and a way to circumvent the reforms ".
He said the war" was the engagement and clear in determining the Salutation, a Parliament that Parliament stop since the start of reforms, with the exception of its previous decision idly on these reforms, if not opposition indirect position given that he did not Atol legislation any law or decision to enter into the legislative competence includes a touch of reform while in the Constitution grants Parliament the authority to legislate the proposal to members as long as these laws do not represent a financial commitment on the budget.
"He argued that" all the laws that are issued under the reform package is a reduction of expenses and Aqlala for disbursements and therefore to Parliament as long as the constitution hand launched in the issuance of laws in this area of legislation these laws and not to stand on the sidelines and even the parliament, for example, did not issue a decision to reduce the allocation of Representatives and the staff of the parliament and reduce protections and reduce Alaivadat and unnecessary expenditure of the same salaries, but still waiting for what holds the government of taken while he had to take the initiative To make such a decision and without stop at Ray government and hold the government.
"He said," Parliament did not interact with the reform measures and even he did not take austerity and financial hardship into consideration when legislation laws of the financial commitments were on the government and sent by the government years ago when there was a financial and an abundance of That party, which was much on Parliament Cancel contained in this provision of law, which includes a load Treasury to provide subsidies to political parties law, especially if we know that Alvin person only Astrthm law so that the party is officially worth subsidy from the ministry.
"He stressed the legal expert that he" has to be for parliament Pay attention to this matter and the issue of reform laws on his own initiative without waiting for laws sent by the government to reform measures are calculated for the government and parliament and are not calculated only for the government but only the prime minister, as is happening now, ".anthy projects
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
