Deputy in the Iraqi parliament accuses the President of the Supreme Court «terrorism judges to delay the cases filed against him
3/28/2013 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add Comment - News Views: 5 -
Baghdad: «Middle East»
accused independent MP in the Iraqi parliament and a member of the Integrity Committee Sabah al-Saadi Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud head the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq terrorizing judges, which delays the proceedings against him as announced referral legal expert Tareq Harb, who represented Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in the a number of issues, to the High Criminal Court on charges of b «crimes against humanity».
Saadi said at a press conference in the parliament building yesterday that «116 people filed complaints with the Iraqi judiciary and the chief prosecutor Ghazanfar Jassim against the president of the Federal Court current Medhat al-Mahmoud and legal expert Tariq Harb on these two crimes against humanity of cut granite permission to Iraqis during the rule of the former regime. The Saadi that «there is a significant development came from prosecutors represent refer Tariq Harb to the High Criminal Court on his involvement with crimes against humanity for cutting ear during the rule of the former regime», pointing out that the investigative panel in Criminal Court refuses to implement the resolution did not apply for interrogation Yet despite the passage of 24 days on the issuance of the memorandum by the prosecution.
Upon contact with the lawyer Tariq Harb to finding out about what reported Saadi turned it addresses two weeks ago in a hospital in Baghdad, according to Tell by «Middle East» son Ziad, saying that «my father treated now in the hospital after being wounded twice in the heart muscle and will undergo a heart catheterization process. He added that «has no or father informed referral to the criminal court or the issuance of any arrest warrant against him».
On the other hand, stressed Saadi that «there is an important development also is no information on a referral prosecutor for Medhat al-Mahmoud to the High Criminal Court». The student-Saadi, who had belonged to the mass of virtue in parliament before announcing bolting them two years ago «High Criminal Court to take legal action against Medhat al-Mahmoud, Tariq war», adding that «there is information about the Medhat al-Mahmoud liquidate his assets in Iraq and sent to the United Arab Emirates and the United States» . He guessed Saadi that «there was a deal based on the evacuated head of the Federal Court current Medhat al-Mahmoud veto law of the mandate of the three presidencies, compared to close the case against him and smuggled out of Iraq».
Meanwhile, member of the Iraqi parliament and a member of the Integrity Committee Hussein al-Asadi (Vice breakaway coalition of state law) told the «Middle East» that «the Iraqi constitution grants parliament the power-up personal issues and various files because Attorney independent entity even though I belong to block certain terms that Article 50 necessitated the officials and government departments to answer questions and inquiries MP as well as eligibility in the work accountability, saying that what he is doing Saadi «falls in this context because the prosecutor has immunity, which makes it able to access all that wants to access it, provided that it does not become practical to target personal or partisan or sectarian. In response to a question on whether the Parliament as a legislative authority in the framework of the Integrity Commission information and sufficient evidence, including raised against the head of the judiciary in Iraq, said al-Asadi said that «Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud head the Federal Supreme Court sent by a letter to the chairman of the parliament and request circulated to committees Parliamentary and to members of Parliament which indicates that if Saadi has nothing against him should go to the judiciary with evidence and not to the media. Asadi adds that «Saadi says Within justifications to go to the media that the judges are afraid Mahmood therefore go to the media through press conferences in order to provide pressure on the judges to move cases against Mahmood.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]