Home
Washington did not provide service only to Baghdad to remove Saddam
12/22/2011 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add comments - about: New York Times last with the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, we will finally answer the basic question on this country: Was Iraq as it was, because Saddam was as was it? Or was Saddam the way it was because Iraq was what it was? - A group of sects and clans can not coexist with each other only under the iron fist. Now we will get the answer because both Alqdtin Alhaddidetyn, internal and external (Saddam Hussein and the U.S. armed forces) may Rahlta. We will see whether the Iraqis can govern themselves require respect and help in the progress of society - or that it will end with an iron fist new. We hope to eventually be good but the evidence suggests otherwise. Iraq was always a war options. Did not we cooperate with the people of Iraq in order to change the political course of this pivotal state in the heart of the Arab world and to help put the region is on the democratic process? After th of September atheist, the idea of helping to change the content of Arab politics and address the root causes of the disorder of Arab States and terrorism, seems a legitimate strategic choice, but was it a wise choice? The answer is twofold, "No" and "perhaps, you will see." I say "No," because whatever happens in Iraq, he will remain as is even if they become like Switzerland, unfortunately we paid a big price for it. Us lives and wounded, and a valuable addition to the money paid by the Iraqis as well. One of the reasons for these high costs is that the project was very difficult, and the other reason is the lack of merit team George W. Bush to continue the war. Another reason is the nature of the enemy, Iran and the dictatorship of the Arab rulers and Al Qaeda, were not all want democracy in the heart of the Arab world and has made efforts to sow fear and sectarian differences in order to thwart the project of democracy. So no matter what the underlying causes of war, in the end it came to this question: Did the U.S. and its allies Sidhron Iraqi al-Qaeda and its allies in the heart of the Arab world, or that the rule is that Stdhr America and its allies? Thanks to the Awakening movement in Iraq and to sustain momentum and to the United States and its allies in defeating al-Qaeda and lay the basis for the most important result of the Iraq war: the first social contract, a voluntary between the components of the community about how to share power and resources in the Arab country, and govern themselves democratically. America has helped in the generation of that contract in Iraq, and trying all the democratic movements of Arab reproduction of this decade. This leads us to the second part, "perhaps, you will see." Could pay a lot of money for something still in transition. We pick the fruit Iraq Strategy: Drop the dictator, and defeat al Qaeda, reducing their ability to attack us, and intimidation, forcing Libya Canutatouraha to abandon its nuclear program, and the birth of free markets in Kurdistan and the free press in Iraq. However, Iraq will be a transition only if it becomes a model for a country where all components co-exist and share power. And as we see in Syria, Yemen, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, this is the case that will decide the fate of all the Arab Awakening. Can the Arab world to develop a policy of compromise with the plurality of regular trading of power where it can be for people to live as citizens and not to feel that their clan or sect or their party either to control or to die? This will not happen over night and overnight in Iraq, but if what has happened over time it will be Iraq's transition as it is a necessary condition in order to root democracy in that region, and without it will suffer the Arab world, boiling for a long time. the best case scenario for Iraq is that it will be Russia's second - a country incomplete, corrupt, a new generation takes many years to develop. Iraq's current leaders are the remains of antiquity, such as Vladimir Putin in Russia. Always will be burdened with the past. But this generation will have a different way of thinking I do not know whether Iraq Sevolha. Possibilities goes on, but creating this opportunity is an important endeavor, and we can not but respect for the Americans and the British and the Iraqis who have paid the price in order to achieve this. translation term
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
