Home
Iraq and U.S. strategy / / Riad Al-Bayati
By: management of the Centre
Date: Monday 27/2/2012 9:38
The year 1991 witnessed the fall of the Soviet Union and the beginning of the stage and the unipolar world entered a new stage to become the United States the only pole in the world
After nearly more than three decades of engagement with the Soviet Union in the management of the world and the consequent participation of specific strategies that phase, which began after World War II. Eisenhower was the Chief of Staff who led the battle victory over the Reich is a strategy that stage, which was named after him, and that strategy Which Drawn Oisenh War focus on sharing the world with the last pole came out victorious from the war as well and this is the fact that To Eisenhower that places them in the account he draws his strategy for that phase, which later renamed the Cold War, which summarized the readiness of a major atomic war out with putting all the controls to avoid a nuclear war has been described by the position of poles that they two trains go on the road to train one to the maximum of speed and direction of amphibolous even happened collision both will go to nuclear winter and drag all of humanity to this winter, and within this concept managed sub-strategies to exhaustion the other party and the economy is the area managed by the United States of superiority over the Soviet Union and to pay Arms race and wars expensive side As it is sometimes a losing war in Vietnam but in the end disastrous for the Soviet economy and this was Strategic Cumulative Are in the strategy of the Great Patriotic is the destruction of the Soviet Union, sponsor of the thought of the Marxist Allnini for a period of more than three decades, this accumulation continued and were maintained conclusion is Star Wars and spending huge compensated by the United States technologies sides such as the transportation revolution and computers do not follow the Soviet Union, the same policy considerations of security and ideology, and finally The straw that broke the camel's back the war in Afghanistan and the Iraq war in 1991 was the end of the Soviet Union and bringing Iraq is the key to the new strategy of the United States.
The new man who has to paint the way for a strategic Of the United States is General Colin Powell Who conducted the first victory in Iraq in 1991 Such as the fall of the Soviet Union and after the agreement of Malta, which he described George Bush Sr. real history of the end of World War II was on the Soviet leaders with their own eyes to see how the hits Iraq a strong ally of the Soviet Union and destroyed and humiliated Soviet weapons used by Iraq Efficiently in repeated wars against either Israel or the war with Iran, and actually after the war on Iraq to the rupture of the Soviet Union, several countries within a few months.
Was on Powell to re-assess the risks to the United States and the new threat coming from Islamic fundamentalism rising does not fit at that point with the power of the U.S. Army and was the theory of the ant and the elephant, which controls the culture of U.S. military believes that these new risks of terrorism is essentially a risk meant the security and intelligence which is not the responsibility of the armed forces The fight against drugs and transnational crime is the responsibility of the Internal Security Forces and all of these risks can not show the strength and superiority of U.S. forces and U.S. forces to avoid conflicts, such as small Krinada, Panama and the wars of this kind that do not show of American power, but is likely to do harm to it and the man was heavy Barth African who make it refuses to run for competition Clinton in the second session of his heavily scandals looking for applications for the new strategy, and here he returned Iraq back to the fore and during the eight years of the Clinton administration was unable to Establishment of U.S. military from using force except in a few occasions to Iraq a second time when it was bombed Iraq because of being accused of trying to assassinate George the father when he visited Kuwait and the other after Iraq refused to inspect one of its nuclear facilities and both were compliments of the President do not forget the U.S. military position on the Vietnam War and could not relish the charges against him in the case of sexual harassment That approval of these two processes was within this context, no more no less. That the U.S. military establishment, which missed the foreign policy And CIA and the concerns of Arab States a victory in hand in 1991 They see the Iraqi government continues to challenge American power unique in the world and this is what weakened the prestige of the United States and its armed forces and gives hope for the emergence of new powers woke up to compete with the United States such as the heir to the Russian Federation of Soviet power without ideological Marxism China and its economy growing giant yellow and Tofanah human and India billions of people and a growing economy, rising
The Iran Victor the second side of the war on Iraq in 1991 is not going to challenge the United States only, but of trying to dominate Iraq Stepper towards collapse with the direction you do not want By the United States, a trend that leads to the fall of Iraq in the bosom of Syria and Iran, and therefore this means disaster for the U.S. policies at the same time the CIA had failed to make any change in Iraq and failed to quality operations that have already been mentioned in moving the situation at home has led policy of siege led by the U.S. State Department to end the forces of the people in Inside Iraq for the benefit of the poor who could not Iraqis, despite this weakness of dropping it, but that the U.S. State Department, which has embraced the opposition outside Iraq severed the link inside Iraq but set up to an anomaly suffered by Iraq today that the Iraqi political class heavily suspicious of the people inside Iraq and entrenched sectarianism which encouraged careerism and opportunism and the selection of line with the orientations of the employees of the Baath Party, who are often opportunistic former Baathist state did not establish a limit Alan because they do not want the already strong state is aware that it is unable to manage them.
Islamic fundamentalism was the CIA that enabled it to take over Afghanistan pose a new challenge for such a force in the era of monopoly in the world, and this uniqueness extends to the nuclear-armed Pakistan is a very dangerous and was voted the world's high throw the blame on the United States because of this policy Concern to the military the Americans. That the strikes against these forces of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and elsewhere in the world the United States showed a weak state in the era of American unilateralism in the world . We have gone too far this Islamic forces to wage war despite the arrival of a new president to the United States Republican Party and surrounded by a group of advocates to show the power of the United States to the world that Rumsfeld and Cheney They are neo-conservative ideologues were present as they watched U.S. trade symbol Breaks down the stroke volume of sacrificed American intelligence failure I have hit the United States in their own backyard for the first time since its inception was struck by lightning and the Americans for the first time a U.S. citizen feels Almottagahl usually foreign policy that there is a danger coming from abroad reached them and the administration must To address this danger, and here once again emerged as a strategy Powell was a new and must search for the goal of showing the possibilities of this force to the maximum and although the danger was coming from Afghanistan and the Afghan arena but will not show the force that the decision of the war on Saddam On 11 September and as stated in the book of Bob Woodward (Bush at War) with the collapse of World Trade Center The Iraqi arena is one of the U.S. show of force to the maximum extent.
Created the United States all the resources for success in Iraq, large media campaign to focus on nuclear weapons strange to not know that they did not exist, an authoritarian regime is unjust, a fact that does not care about her world, but the argument acceptable after 13 years of cruel blockade which paved the way for the rise of Salafi Shia in Iraq destroyed middle-class secular liberal and it was all research centers are estimated to need approximately 450,000 troops to overthrow the regime and control of Iraq, these forces were actually available to accomplish the mission . Used in an innovative way of armed force in the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Started by U.S. forces to enter Iraqi territory without shelling preliminary air which is contrary to all principles of the use of military force and in fact it was all of a sudden the Iraqi leadership, which was moving on the beginning of the war with air operations, a move overland U.S. into Iraq surprise her and confused perceptions of the Iraqi leadership already suggest that the events that were not the Iraqi leadership believes that the U.S. will proceed with a land invasion can read this procedure Against the backdrop of war in 1991 when I left the U.S. foreign policy mission not accomplished from the standpoint of the military leadership of America and this lesson was the military who believe Aostratejah new military prevent a repeat of what happened in the year 1991, by entering directly into the ground in Iraq Mtbakan theory closer indirect Liddell Hart prevailing in the NATO alliance and the rush to Baghdad strongly the American forces have been able to reach the international airport in Baghdad on 3 April 2003 Progress has been faster than the movement of the U.S. State Department, but that this progress has confounded the world, who believed that this war could last 6 months was the sight of Iraqi onlookers and sometimes apathetic to what is happening confusing to the world the Iraqis afraid to leave the United States Iraq before the job is done and it is not Overthrow the regime only, but had to quit the ruling regime in full.
Regime fell quickly unexpected and this confused the U.S. command and the troops were actually used in the projection system does not exceed one third of troops estimated to complete the mission accomplished the task and succeeded strategy Powell unexpectedly has emerged as the U.S. force as a force can not defeat them and unique in the world and prompted the U.S. military to cancel plans for bringing in more troops and had to control the country, an area of Iraq troop of not more than 150,000 soldiers, ignoring the need to manage a country destroyed all the infrastructure under the nose of the U.S. and it was clear from the start for all Iraqis, observers have a n U.S. government, which was surprised by the fall of the regime is no longer any management plan for the country and the U.S. military does not have the experience, such as the British Army to manage the occupied territories, especially communities such as Iraq in its diversity of sectarian skeptical interconnected and ethnic heterogeneous situation was greater than the experience of the U.S. military that destroyed the state was unable to re-build so far and it seems that the confusion in the administration was strange and U.S. administrations were disassembled That the modern, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in her memoirs for lack of knowledge of the decision to disband the Iraqi army before the issuance of the civil governor something strange Can not be understood that the confusion that prevailed in the administration of Iraq since the first day and the decisions of the civil ruler to dissolve the army and foreign security services and the decision had sliding ablation led to a serious everything that happened later. Military leadership was a mistake to imagine a big battle has been completed is one of the leaders encouraged the trend to the base to Iraq, where appropriate environment that crisis and the decisions of the civil governor actually Ontdhart these leaders about 6 months to begin the battle with the army of cocky and political leadership In Washington, was to imagine that the Iraqi arena Is the appropriate arena to keep the terrorism inside the U.S. and get rid of it in Iraq and this was strange and contrary to the strategy the U.S. military and within 5 years of conflict the U.S. military used all available means he had to reinforce his troops in Baghdad In 2007, forces from outside Iraq For controlled The situation in Iraq out of control in some places, including Baghdad.
The situation was walking towards the worst all actions taken during the past years it grew worse and increase in unit operations led to civilian casualties, further alienating the Iraqi people by the occupation forces causing it to lose popularity in the mid-section of the Iraqi people welcoming formerly Overthrow the regime and here arose the problem was the strategy the U.S. military is capable of dealing with regular armies controlled by the states, but to deal with the militias was something new to move from Iraq to Afghanistan, the U.S. military, along with CIA blind, control in Iraq in 2007 and Gen. Petraeus, commander of the Airborne 101 and the new commander of U.S. forces Have recognized this dilemma, the complex also noted that the relationship is not as seems between Iraqi Sunnis and al-Qaeda that it was vanity that exceed the red lines in Iraqi society, tribal Sunni and he had to rush to the influence of these point to this community This was the skeptic by step solution of the Shiites to leave the U.S. in the Iraqi arena and the transfer of experience to Afghanistan. In preparation for the review of the strategy began In Iraq and succeeded at first, but began a fail in the same arena because of different circumstances, but it provided a great experience American policy-makers.
• Superior U.S. force that is able to gain victory, but it is not able to keep the victory in a variety of civil fragmented.
• That the processes of pieces with irregular irregular enemy exposed to great loss of life
• Regionalization of conflicts and delivered to local elements (heat of the Syrian army and militias in Libya
• The use of technology To its full potential as a field of excellence is not owned by Militias or left behind by the
• Re-understanding of political Islam, and transportation of the check box to the enemies as potential friends that Iraq was
We have cooperated successfully test the forces of Islamic Sunni and Shiite with the Americans.
That the new American strategy, adopted to reduce spending and reduce the losses and dependence on large technological capabilities of the United States Experience Ondjt in Iraq militarily and politically, is what we see now in the Arab spring That the United States, which withdrew its troops from Iraq in order to avoid possible conflict with Iran could lead to casualties can be avoided and the resolution of this conflict by other modes is the realization of a new strategy in Iraq has matured.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
By: management of the Centre
Date: Monday 27/2/2012 9:38
The year 1991 witnessed the fall of the Soviet Union and the beginning of the stage and the unipolar world entered a new stage to become the United States the only pole in the world
After nearly more than three decades of engagement with the Soviet Union in the management of the world and the consequent participation of specific strategies that phase, which began after World War II. Eisenhower was the Chief of Staff who led the battle victory over the Reich is a strategy that stage, which was named after him, and that strategy Which Drawn Oisenh War focus on sharing the world with the last pole came out victorious from the war as well and this is the fact that To Eisenhower that places them in the account he draws his strategy for that phase, which later renamed the Cold War, which summarized the readiness of a major atomic war out with putting all the controls to avoid a nuclear war has been described by the position of poles that they two trains go on the road to train one to the maximum of speed and direction of amphibolous even happened collision both will go to nuclear winter and drag all of humanity to this winter, and within this concept managed sub-strategies to exhaustion the other party and the economy is the area managed by the United States of superiority over the Soviet Union and to pay Arms race and wars expensive side As it is sometimes a losing war in Vietnam but in the end disastrous for the Soviet economy and this was Strategic Cumulative Are in the strategy of the Great Patriotic is the destruction of the Soviet Union, sponsor of the thought of the Marxist Allnini for a period of more than three decades, this accumulation continued and were maintained conclusion is Star Wars and spending huge compensated by the United States technologies sides such as the transportation revolution and computers do not follow the Soviet Union, the same policy considerations of security and ideology, and finally The straw that broke the camel's back the war in Afghanistan and the Iraq war in 1991 was the end of the Soviet Union and bringing Iraq is the key to the new strategy of the United States.
The new man who has to paint the way for a strategic Of the United States is General Colin Powell Who conducted the first victory in Iraq in 1991 Such as the fall of the Soviet Union and after the agreement of Malta, which he described George Bush Sr. real history of the end of World War II was on the Soviet leaders with their own eyes to see how the hits Iraq a strong ally of the Soviet Union and destroyed and humiliated Soviet weapons used by Iraq Efficiently in repeated wars against either Israel or the war with Iran, and actually after the war on Iraq to the rupture of the Soviet Union, several countries within a few months.
Was on Powell to re-assess the risks to the United States and the new threat coming from Islamic fundamentalism rising does not fit at that point with the power of the U.S. Army and was the theory of the ant and the elephant, which controls the culture of U.S. military believes that these new risks of terrorism is essentially a risk meant the security and intelligence which is not the responsibility of the armed forces The fight against drugs and transnational crime is the responsibility of the Internal Security Forces and all of these risks can not show the strength and superiority of U.S. forces and U.S. forces to avoid conflicts, such as small Krinada, Panama and the wars of this kind that do not show of American power, but is likely to do harm to it and the man was heavy Barth African who make it refuses to run for competition Clinton in the second session of his heavily scandals looking for applications for the new strategy, and here he returned Iraq back to the fore and during the eight years of the Clinton administration was unable to Establishment of U.S. military from using force except in a few occasions to Iraq a second time when it was bombed Iraq because of being accused of trying to assassinate George the father when he visited Kuwait and the other after Iraq refused to inspect one of its nuclear facilities and both were compliments of the President do not forget the U.S. military position on the Vietnam War and could not relish the charges against him in the case of sexual harassment That approval of these two processes was within this context, no more no less. That the U.S. military establishment, which missed the foreign policy And CIA and the concerns of Arab States a victory in hand in 1991 They see the Iraqi government continues to challenge American power unique in the world and this is what weakened the prestige of the United States and its armed forces and gives hope for the emergence of new powers woke up to compete with the United States such as the heir to the Russian Federation of Soviet power without ideological Marxism China and its economy growing giant yellow and Tofanah human and India billions of people and a growing economy, rising
The Iran Victor the second side of the war on Iraq in 1991 is not going to challenge the United States only, but of trying to dominate Iraq Stepper towards collapse with the direction you do not want By the United States, a trend that leads to the fall of Iraq in the bosom of Syria and Iran, and therefore this means disaster for the U.S. policies at the same time the CIA had failed to make any change in Iraq and failed to quality operations that have already been mentioned in moving the situation at home has led policy of siege led by the U.S. State Department to end the forces of the people in Inside Iraq for the benefit of the poor who could not Iraqis, despite this weakness of dropping it, but that the U.S. State Department, which has embraced the opposition outside Iraq severed the link inside Iraq but set up to an anomaly suffered by Iraq today that the Iraqi political class heavily suspicious of the people inside Iraq and entrenched sectarianism which encouraged careerism and opportunism and the selection of line with the orientations of the employees of the Baath Party, who are often opportunistic former Baathist state did not establish a limit Alan because they do not want the already strong state is aware that it is unable to manage them.
Islamic fundamentalism was the CIA that enabled it to take over Afghanistan pose a new challenge for such a force in the era of monopoly in the world, and this uniqueness extends to the nuclear-armed Pakistan is a very dangerous and was voted the world's high throw the blame on the United States because of this policy Concern to the military the Americans. That the strikes against these forces of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and elsewhere in the world the United States showed a weak state in the era of American unilateralism in the world . We have gone too far this Islamic forces to wage war despite the arrival of a new president to the United States Republican Party and surrounded by a group of advocates to show the power of the United States to the world that Rumsfeld and Cheney They are neo-conservative ideologues were present as they watched U.S. trade symbol Breaks down the stroke volume of sacrificed American intelligence failure I have hit the United States in their own backyard for the first time since its inception was struck by lightning and the Americans for the first time a U.S. citizen feels Almottagahl usually foreign policy that there is a danger coming from abroad reached them and the administration must To address this danger, and here once again emerged as a strategy Powell was a new and must search for the goal of showing the possibilities of this force to the maximum and although the danger was coming from Afghanistan and the Afghan arena but will not show the force that the decision of the war on Saddam On 11 September and as stated in the book of Bob Woodward (Bush at War) with the collapse of World Trade Center The Iraqi arena is one of the U.S. show of force to the maximum extent.
Created the United States all the resources for success in Iraq, large media campaign to focus on nuclear weapons strange to not know that they did not exist, an authoritarian regime is unjust, a fact that does not care about her world, but the argument acceptable after 13 years of cruel blockade which paved the way for the rise of Salafi Shia in Iraq destroyed middle-class secular liberal and it was all research centers are estimated to need approximately 450,000 troops to overthrow the regime and control of Iraq, these forces were actually available to accomplish the mission . Used in an innovative way of armed force in the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Started by U.S. forces to enter Iraqi territory without shelling preliminary air which is contrary to all principles of the use of military force and in fact it was all of a sudden the Iraqi leadership, which was moving on the beginning of the war with air operations, a move overland U.S. into Iraq surprise her and confused perceptions of the Iraqi leadership already suggest that the events that were not the Iraqi leadership believes that the U.S. will proceed with a land invasion can read this procedure Against the backdrop of war in 1991 when I left the U.S. foreign policy mission not accomplished from the standpoint of the military leadership of America and this lesson was the military who believe Aostratejah new military prevent a repeat of what happened in the year 1991, by entering directly into the ground in Iraq Mtbakan theory closer indirect Liddell Hart prevailing in the NATO alliance and the rush to Baghdad strongly the American forces have been able to reach the international airport in Baghdad on 3 April 2003 Progress has been faster than the movement of the U.S. State Department, but that this progress has confounded the world, who believed that this war could last 6 months was the sight of Iraqi onlookers and sometimes apathetic to what is happening confusing to the world the Iraqis afraid to leave the United States Iraq before the job is done and it is not Overthrow the regime only, but had to quit the ruling regime in full.
Regime fell quickly unexpected and this confused the U.S. command and the troops were actually used in the projection system does not exceed one third of troops estimated to complete the mission accomplished the task and succeeded strategy Powell unexpectedly has emerged as the U.S. force as a force can not defeat them and unique in the world and prompted the U.S. military to cancel plans for bringing in more troops and had to control the country, an area of Iraq troop of not more than 150,000 soldiers, ignoring the need to manage a country destroyed all the infrastructure under the nose of the U.S. and it was clear from the start for all Iraqis, observers have a n U.S. government, which was surprised by the fall of the regime is no longer any management plan for the country and the U.S. military does not have the experience, such as the British Army to manage the occupied territories, especially communities such as Iraq in its diversity of sectarian skeptical interconnected and ethnic heterogeneous situation was greater than the experience of the U.S. military that destroyed the state was unable to re-build so far and it seems that the confusion in the administration was strange and U.S. administrations were disassembled That the modern, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in her memoirs for lack of knowledge of the decision to disband the Iraqi army before the issuance of the civil governor something strange Can not be understood that the confusion that prevailed in the administration of Iraq since the first day and the decisions of the civil ruler to dissolve the army and foreign security services and the decision had sliding ablation led to a serious everything that happened later. Military leadership was a mistake to imagine a big battle has been completed is one of the leaders encouraged the trend to the base to Iraq, where appropriate environment that crisis and the decisions of the civil governor actually Ontdhart these leaders about 6 months to begin the battle with the army of cocky and political leadership In Washington, was to imagine that the Iraqi arena Is the appropriate arena to keep the terrorism inside the U.S. and get rid of it in Iraq and this was strange and contrary to the strategy the U.S. military and within 5 years of conflict the U.S. military used all available means he had to reinforce his troops in Baghdad In 2007, forces from outside Iraq For controlled The situation in Iraq out of control in some places, including Baghdad.
The situation was walking towards the worst all actions taken during the past years it grew worse and increase in unit operations led to civilian casualties, further alienating the Iraqi people by the occupation forces causing it to lose popularity in the mid-section of the Iraqi people welcoming formerly Overthrow the regime and here arose the problem was the strategy the U.S. military is capable of dealing with regular armies controlled by the states, but to deal with the militias was something new to move from Iraq to Afghanistan, the U.S. military, along with CIA blind, control in Iraq in 2007 and Gen. Petraeus, commander of the Airborne 101 and the new commander of U.S. forces Have recognized this dilemma, the complex also noted that the relationship is not as seems between Iraqi Sunnis and al-Qaeda that it was vanity that exceed the red lines in Iraqi society, tribal Sunni and he had to rush to the influence of these point to this community This was the skeptic by step solution of the Shiites to leave the U.S. in the Iraqi arena and the transfer of experience to Afghanistan. In preparation for the review of the strategy began In Iraq and succeeded at first, but began a fail in the same arena because of different circumstances, but it provided a great experience American policy-makers.
• Superior U.S. force that is able to gain victory, but it is not able to keep the victory in a variety of civil fragmented.
• That the processes of pieces with irregular irregular enemy exposed to great loss of life
• Regionalization of conflicts and delivered to local elements (heat of the Syrian army and militias in Libya
• The use of technology To its full potential as a field of excellence is not owned by Militias or left behind by the
• Re-understanding of political Islam, and transportation of the check box to the enemies as potential friends that Iraq was
We have cooperated successfully test the forces of Islamic Sunni and Shiite with the Americans.
That the new American strategy, adopted to reduce spending and reduce the losses and dependence on large technological capabilities of the United States Experience Ondjt in Iraq militarily and politically, is what we see now in the Arab spring That the United States, which withdrew its troops from Iraq in order to avoid possible conflict with Iran could lead to casualties can be avoided and the resolution of this conflict by other modes is the realization of a new strategy in Iraq has matured.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
