Baez: all influenced by what is happening and try to stand at the same distance from everyone
PUKmedia about the "Middle East", 03/01/2012 10:30:31
Peaceful transfer of power that took place in recent days to change my presidency, parliament and government in the Kurdistan region of Iraq has raised mixed reactions at the popular, particularly among the rules of the party of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan led by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and the Kurdistan Democratic Party led by regional president, Massoud Barzani, where there is a section of cadres and members of the Patriotic Union of injustice as a result they feel out of the hands of the government the presidency of their party after two years of the mandate of the Barham Saleh, and in turn feel another section of the cadres and members of the Democratic Party happy and pleased to return as prime minister to their party.
But the irony is that the alien Dr. Arslan Baez, who took over as a result of this change the position of parliament speaker was a member of the Political Bureau of the National Union, which sought to retain the chair of parliament and former government intact to give them the opportunity to complete their mandate of 4 years. And went on Baez, he told «Middle East» in the first press interview with him after his accession to office: «the trading that took place came the implementation of the Strategic Compact, which we signed with the Democratic Party ally, an agreement was a key factor in strengthening security and stability of Kurdistan and the continued pace of reconstruction in which». In response to a question about the consideration of the opposition parties to this agreement the strategic monopoly of power by the two parties? Answered Baez: «in all countries of the world resort parties and political forces to alliances between them to form the government, already rare to find in European countries developed a party or political organization can grab the majority in the elections, and it must ultimately have recourse the parties that contest the elections to the alliances For the majority, which allows to form a government, and we did so, what is wrong in it? ».
He spoke Baez on Iraqi affairs beginner position Kurdistan Parliament on the issue of implementation of Article 140 and said: «This article has been complexity of the procedure implemented is acceptable, there are those who say that they had become in the governance of the dead, but we object to this proposal, and I think that the differences taking place in the political arena in Iraq has in turn contributed to the complexity of steps in the implementation of that article .. Accordingly, we affirm in a time when the constitutionality of this article, we renew our call to the other parties to dialogue and negotiation to resolve them ». I asked him «Middle East»: you claim you are to dialogue but you do not even Tthoron with the parties concerned to that article such as Turkomen, for example? He replied, President of the Parliament of Kurdistan: «We do not mind a dialogue with any component or party whether it is interested in this article or otherwise, and we feel that there is a positive change in the position of the Turkmen recently, and we must point out on this occasion that the position of Turkey's Kurdistan region reflected a positive on the relationship between the Turkmen and the Kurds ».
He touched on Baez to mobility Kurds in neighboring countries, and especially mobility Kurds in Syria, and whether the Kurdistan region will be a reference to the political forces in the Kurdish rest of the region, and said: «The Arabs are supporting the issues of each other both in the Levant, Morocco, we have the right also to support the struggle of our brothers and issues in other countries, but that does not mean to be at the expense of our relations and our common interests with those countries .. Therefore we try to maintain a balance between the two, To achieve this, we have emphasized and we always struggle to peaceful, democratic and civilized and civil powers of the States of the Kurdish region ».
And on the situation of the Iraqi crisis and the conflicting statements issued by the Kurdish leaders, which confirms some of them because they have become a party to that crisis, while others are trying to distance themselves from it, the head of the Kurdistan parliament: «If we take the issue of part sectarian, we are not a party to any sectarian conflict in Iraq, but if we took the side of the political party we are definitely ». He continued: «We are in the midst of a serious political crisis can not distance ourselves about at all, because we are part of Iraq as a nation, and are influenced by what goes where, but with all that we are trying to stand at the same distance from everyone, and not to be our position at the expense of some against each other, because we have done away with, because the situation in Iraq is not likely complexities greater than what happened, we are closer to the Shiites, of course, because we have strong relationships and historical, then the Shiites support the general demands of nationalism and national, as opposed to the Iraqi List, for example, that have not yet expect us to any agreement with respect to our rights by their own admission the legitimate, and that does not mean that there is between Shiites who do not object to our rights, but on the contrary I would say that some of them is more chauvinistic than the others ». He continued: «we are trying to maintain our relationships with all parties, and seek not to prejudice the balance is currently in Iraq and approved by the Constitution».
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
PUKmedia about the "Middle East", 03/01/2012 10:30:31
Peaceful transfer of power that took place in recent days to change my presidency, parliament and government in the Kurdistan region of Iraq has raised mixed reactions at the popular, particularly among the rules of the party of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan led by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and the Kurdistan Democratic Party led by regional president, Massoud Barzani, where there is a section of cadres and members of the Patriotic Union of injustice as a result they feel out of the hands of the government the presidency of their party after two years of the mandate of the Barham Saleh, and in turn feel another section of the cadres and members of the Democratic Party happy and pleased to return as prime minister to their party.
But the irony is that the alien Dr. Arslan Baez, who took over as a result of this change the position of parliament speaker was a member of the Political Bureau of the National Union, which sought to retain the chair of parliament and former government intact to give them the opportunity to complete their mandate of 4 years. And went on Baez, he told «Middle East» in the first press interview with him after his accession to office: «the trading that took place came the implementation of the Strategic Compact, which we signed with the Democratic Party ally, an agreement was a key factor in strengthening security and stability of Kurdistan and the continued pace of reconstruction in which». In response to a question about the consideration of the opposition parties to this agreement the strategic monopoly of power by the two parties? Answered Baez: «in all countries of the world resort parties and political forces to alliances between them to form the government, already rare to find in European countries developed a party or political organization can grab the majority in the elections, and it must ultimately have recourse the parties that contest the elections to the alliances For the majority, which allows to form a government, and we did so, what is wrong in it? ».
He spoke Baez on Iraqi affairs beginner position Kurdistan Parliament on the issue of implementation of Article 140 and said: «This article has been complexity of the procedure implemented is acceptable, there are those who say that they had become in the governance of the dead, but we object to this proposal, and I think that the differences taking place in the political arena in Iraq has in turn contributed to the complexity of steps in the implementation of that article .. Accordingly, we affirm in a time when the constitutionality of this article, we renew our call to the other parties to dialogue and negotiation to resolve them ». I asked him «Middle East»: you claim you are to dialogue but you do not even Tthoron with the parties concerned to that article such as Turkomen, for example? He replied, President of the Parliament of Kurdistan: «We do not mind a dialogue with any component or party whether it is interested in this article or otherwise, and we feel that there is a positive change in the position of the Turkmen recently, and we must point out on this occasion that the position of Turkey's Kurdistan region reflected a positive on the relationship between the Turkmen and the Kurds ».
He touched on Baez to mobility Kurds in neighboring countries, and especially mobility Kurds in Syria, and whether the Kurdistan region will be a reference to the political forces in the Kurdish rest of the region, and said: «The Arabs are supporting the issues of each other both in the Levant, Morocco, we have the right also to support the struggle of our brothers and issues in other countries, but that does not mean to be at the expense of our relations and our common interests with those countries .. Therefore we try to maintain a balance between the two, To achieve this, we have emphasized and we always struggle to peaceful, democratic and civilized and civil powers of the States of the Kurdish region ».
And on the situation of the Iraqi crisis and the conflicting statements issued by the Kurdish leaders, which confirms some of them because they have become a party to that crisis, while others are trying to distance themselves from it, the head of the Kurdistan parliament: «If we take the issue of part sectarian, we are not a party to any sectarian conflict in Iraq, but if we took the side of the political party we are definitely ». He continued: «We are in the midst of a serious political crisis can not distance ourselves about at all, because we are part of Iraq as a nation, and are influenced by what goes where, but with all that we are trying to stand at the same distance from everyone, and not to be our position at the expense of some against each other, because we have done away with, because the situation in Iraq is not likely complexities greater than what happened, we are closer to the Shiites, of course, because we have strong relationships and historical, then the Shiites support the general demands of nationalism and national, as opposed to the Iraqi List, for example, that have not yet expect us to any agreement with respect to our rights by their own admission the legitimate, and that does not mean that there is between Shiites who do not object to our rights, but on the contrary I would say that some of them is more chauvinistic than the others ». He continued: «we are trying to maintain our relationships with all parties, and seek not to prejudice the balance is currently in Iraq and approved by the Constitution».
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]