Home
Iran and the open sea Jeopoltica
Khalil Hussein
Number 3 views
Posted 10/03/2012 04:43 AM
A year ago launched the Iran policy of geography is the closest to a down of anything else, after crossing the vessels Maritime Suez Canal, was a clear message of dimensions in the start of the movement of Egypt and the other at the time, today expressed Barjtan warplanes channel and access to marine areas are sensitive geopolitical region and internationally, coupled with relatively different circumstances, and change the size and strength of the regional players, what are the dimensions and implications of this policy? Is it possible to discharge the political, security and military in these situations?
There are many theories in political geography often turn and easily to destinations Giopolitikh, and here lies the sensitivity of the subject on the ramifications of any neighboring country to take their foreign policies that range and the frame. And often also turned those theories and their applications to group elements and factors of concern and apprehension and fear of geographical neighbors of that State or States that adopt such policies.
In fact, also, not surprising on the absolute state aspiring to play the roles of major regional that tend toward those policies, but more importantly the specific selection of the appropriate envelope for implementation, so as not to turn into a justification for the launch of conflicts and wars that are not necessarily serve or benefit of such policies.
Used by Iran before the month has passed since the Strait of Hormuz to the delivery of messages in different directions, near and far, and before crossing the first of the Suez Canal a precedent in light of the Islamic Republic, crossing the second direction of the medium, specifically beaches Syrian, with a clear declaration Basttba this step-by-step other marine toward the Atlantic Ocean, what It also means the actual process and its ability to sail the high seas also in the Pacific, which is part of the Arabian Sea and the entrance to it.
In preliminary analysis, is the expansion of geopolitical sea of Iran, if not geopolitical, specific track in the foreign policies of Iran, which is an ambitious high-cost, regionally and internationally, it is difficult for the States concerned him, swallow and digest these messages readily and easily, that were not this step is the context of path to a negotiated political aims is coming to swap the sizes of the other kind of strategic, what are the prices of potential for that?
First, the sailing of Iran on the high seas and access to strategic areas of sensitive, is the kind of challenge disposable political borders particular, however, he is difficult to rely upon the accounts of strategy weight is high, considering that sail in these cases requires an environment more is available in terms of principle with Iran, including the continuity and the ability to protect him, and provide the environment deterrent to him in the event of non-acceptance of discount it, which means that Tehran is able to invest for specific targets in space and time suitable for them, and can not continue to gain positions or the imposition of programs with the dimensions of strategy .
In the present case, the trend towards the Mediterranean, and in particular towards the Syrian coast, a clear message for those involved in a crisis, the Syrian, a clear explanation that it calls for is the quality of messages regardless of the results of the process. It also is a clear message of "Israel" that its warships are at a distance of a close of them, which of course it is not tolerated by "Israel" that accompany the access of Iran to the Mediterranean with the arrival of Chancellor of American National Security Affairs, to "Israel", which places the subject within the serious challenges which is supposed to simplify or not to pass from the American point of view and "Israeli."
That enables Tehran to install the maritime policy, even up to a certain, I mean one way or another consecration of geopolitical space for floor sprawling start from Iran itself via Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, as well as the formation of precedents password is interceptor in each of the Straits of Bab el Mandeb South Red Sea and the Suez Canal in north, although this is covered with traffic law Constantinople Convention of 1888.
In traffic I The United States is still officially in Iraq, and Iran was a country suspicious of that occupation, today and in the crossing the second will be followed by the third towards the Atlantic Ocean, Washington officially out of the picture of Iraq at a time running the Tehran important aspect of the arena, the Iraqi which need not to touch any extension of geopolitical Middle Eastern, and is on Syria in particular.
In starting the political sea the first month ago, used the Tehran threat to close the Strait of Hormuz as a package messages, Fastqublt Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu, and handed over Funniest negotiate over its nuclear program, did not start the negotiations, and even sent packages of additional international sanctions on Tehran, I met him announce the completion of nuclear enrichment is connected with the accelerating mechanisms, what will be the price the second sailing?
Regional and international conditions in the region very precise, can not afford trade-offs of the caliber of strategic, especially if the consequences of future pose a solid on "Israel" from the destination Alekianah, which keeps the door of the crisis open the gates of escalation and possibly all the way to resort to order a copy of the images of war that will be expensive and painful at the same time.
The reach of the Mediterranean Sea, would require passage in Straits are historically the key to Arab national security, and the irony that these two RFC combine Dftehma sea red caused by Coral, will be his donkey this time blood ask of a regional war super easy to slip into a war of global proportions? .
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Khalil Hussein
Number 3 views
Posted 10/03/2012 04:43 AM
A year ago launched the Iran policy of geography is the closest to a down of anything else, after crossing the vessels Maritime Suez Canal, was a clear message of dimensions in the start of the movement of Egypt and the other at the time, today expressed Barjtan warplanes channel and access to marine areas are sensitive geopolitical region and internationally, coupled with relatively different circumstances, and change the size and strength of the regional players, what are the dimensions and implications of this policy? Is it possible to discharge the political, security and military in these situations?
There are many theories in political geography often turn and easily to destinations Giopolitikh, and here lies the sensitivity of the subject on the ramifications of any neighboring country to take their foreign policies that range and the frame. And often also turned those theories and their applications to group elements and factors of concern and apprehension and fear of geographical neighbors of that State or States that adopt such policies.
In fact, also, not surprising on the absolute state aspiring to play the roles of major regional that tend toward those policies, but more importantly the specific selection of the appropriate envelope for implementation, so as not to turn into a justification for the launch of conflicts and wars that are not necessarily serve or benefit of such policies.
Used by Iran before the month has passed since the Strait of Hormuz to the delivery of messages in different directions, near and far, and before crossing the first of the Suez Canal a precedent in light of the Islamic Republic, crossing the second direction of the medium, specifically beaches Syrian, with a clear declaration Basttba this step-by-step other marine toward the Atlantic Ocean, what It also means the actual process and its ability to sail the high seas also in the Pacific, which is part of the Arabian Sea and the entrance to it.
In preliminary analysis, is the expansion of geopolitical sea of Iran, if not geopolitical, specific track in the foreign policies of Iran, which is an ambitious high-cost, regionally and internationally, it is difficult for the States concerned him, swallow and digest these messages readily and easily, that were not this step is the context of path to a negotiated political aims is coming to swap the sizes of the other kind of strategic, what are the prices of potential for that?
First, the sailing of Iran on the high seas and access to strategic areas of sensitive, is the kind of challenge disposable political borders particular, however, he is difficult to rely upon the accounts of strategy weight is high, considering that sail in these cases requires an environment more is available in terms of principle with Iran, including the continuity and the ability to protect him, and provide the environment deterrent to him in the event of non-acceptance of discount it, which means that Tehran is able to invest for specific targets in space and time suitable for them, and can not continue to gain positions or the imposition of programs with the dimensions of strategy .
In the present case, the trend towards the Mediterranean, and in particular towards the Syrian coast, a clear message for those involved in a crisis, the Syrian, a clear explanation that it calls for is the quality of messages regardless of the results of the process. It also is a clear message of "Israel" that its warships are at a distance of a close of them, which of course it is not tolerated by "Israel" that accompany the access of Iran to the Mediterranean with the arrival of Chancellor of American National Security Affairs, to "Israel", which places the subject within the serious challenges which is supposed to simplify or not to pass from the American point of view and "Israeli."
That enables Tehran to install the maritime policy, even up to a certain, I mean one way or another consecration of geopolitical space for floor sprawling start from Iran itself via Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, as well as the formation of precedents password is interceptor in each of the Straits of Bab el Mandeb South Red Sea and the Suez Canal in north, although this is covered with traffic law Constantinople Convention of 1888.
In traffic I The United States is still officially in Iraq, and Iran was a country suspicious of that occupation, today and in the crossing the second will be followed by the third towards the Atlantic Ocean, Washington officially out of the picture of Iraq at a time running the Tehran important aspect of the arena, the Iraqi which need not to touch any extension of geopolitical Middle Eastern, and is on Syria in particular.
In starting the political sea the first month ago, used the Tehran threat to close the Strait of Hormuz as a package messages, Fastqublt Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu, and handed over Funniest negotiate over its nuclear program, did not start the negotiations, and even sent packages of additional international sanctions on Tehran, I met him announce the completion of nuclear enrichment is connected with the accelerating mechanisms, what will be the price the second sailing?
Regional and international conditions in the region very precise, can not afford trade-offs of the caliber of strategic, especially if the consequences of future pose a solid on "Israel" from the destination Alekianah, which keeps the door of the crisis open the gates of escalation and possibly all the way to resort to order a copy of the images of war that will be expensive and painful at the same time.
The reach of the Mediterranean Sea, would require passage in Straits are historically the key to Arab national security, and the irony that these two RFC combine Dftehma sea red caused by Coral, will be his donkey this time blood ask of a regional war super easy to slip into a war of global proportions? .
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
