Home
Expectations deport the adoption of important laws to the next legislative term
10/17/2012 12:00 am
Khalidi «morning»: political differences and incompatibilities hampered pass legislation many
BAGHDAD - morning predicted decision the House of Representatives Mohamed Khaldi relay pass laws important to the next legislative term. and failed the House of Representatives yesterday to pass laws important in the forefront of infrastructure and general amnesty, as lifting Parliament Speaker Osama Nujaifi hearing yesterday more than once to make way for parliamentary blocs to agree on the legal infrastructure and amnesty, but that did not achieve any progress, which saw the cafeteria Parliament some المشادات words between deputies from the State of Law coalition and the Kurdistan Alliance, prompting Parliament Speaker then to adjourn the meeting to the sixth of next month., but Khalidi told »Center Brief for the Iraqi Media Network» that «may be postponed rated vacation legislative parliament, which begins in the 14 of next month and ending on December 14 next», citing that there are «differences and incompatibilities between the political blocs. and added that« the important laws do not vote on it, but political consensus .. And that any law is not prescribed, but important political consensus in the kitchen and then to political blocs and then presented to the House of Representatives and then voting on it. Turn, the President of the parliamentary bloc of the Iraqi List, Salman Jumaili copy of the draft law of infrastructure convincing, adding that his list was vote them positively not for the withdrawal of coalition rule of law in the session on the back View Federal Court Act to a vote. Jumaily said in a statement carried by news agency Baghdad International Tuesday: The «State of Law coalition Show session yesterday the first of embarrassment through breach of quorum the meeting, as the meeting was going on as planned, but all parties in the House of Representatives surprised withdrawal of state law, including under the pretext of the Federal Court »., adding that« Iraq had been waiting impatiently for access to the law of the infrastructure in order to vote, because the revised version submitted to the Presidency of the parliamentary committee concerned was convincing the Iraqi list dramatically »., but the MP for the coalition of state law, Hussein al-Asadi denied the accusations against his coalition undermining quorum meeting of the Council of Representatives in order not to vote on the law of the Federal Court. Asadi said: The« coalition of state law did not The only withdrawing from the meeting but was with him all the parties of the National Alliance, without exception », adding that« the Presidium of the House of Representatives included Federal Court Act on the agenda of the meeting without agreeing upon and not inform the political parties, stressing that the law is the laws of the Iraqi state institutions Therefore it was necessary to the Presidency to take the opinions of the political blocs all and not part of it. also accused a member of the legal representative for the Liberal bloc bright Naji some blocks not wanting enactment of a law of the Federal Court. Naji said in a press statement that «there are attempts to escape from the vote on the law Federal Court and Aqahamha in political disputes and drag it to engage in political deals ». warned that« under the Federal Court for the project Mhassa or sectarian, because the copy law started the professional and directly affecting the political process ». refused Kurdistan Alliance download Presidency of the Council of Representatives, responsibility problems witnessed by voting sessions on some of the laws and the withdrawal of some of the blocks of prejudice quorum. demanded spokesman coalition of Kurdish blocs pro-Tayeb said in press statements, the political blocs to desist from accusations to the presidency of the House of Representatives and load differences that occurred in the voting sessions on some laws. said Tayeb : The «most of what happened is normal, because the differences were at the heart of the laws were not purely political, and that was political, the Presidency of the Council of Representatives is not borne»., adding that «the performance of the House of Representatives is good and he was able to spend an orderly manner to vote on laws beneficial» , indicating that «everything Adorvi House of Representatives to pass some laws need to agree». In another window, but a legislative Also, MP for the Iraqi List, Omar al-Jubouri bill to amend the administrative border of the provinces, which lifted the Legal Committee to the Presidency of the Council of Representatives as «the most dangerous laws the unity of the country and disrupt the general situation ». said at a news conference with a number of MPs that« the law makers had to be aware of it only during the era of the former regime released 237 of the decision and the decree, all related to making changes on the administrative border ». wondered« none of those decisions frequented by the drafters of the law revocation and any of those changes is fair, what is the standard to be adopted to deal with these conditions barbed? ». called Jubouri MP for Kirkuk, the political forces that care about protecting the unity of Iraq to stand against the bill mentioned address and veto it in the House of Representatives, considering tolerated unforgivable crime, as he put it. stressed that »this law, which would disrupt the overall situation, may cause considerable chaos in the country if passed, because there is no administrative unit in Iraq was not exposed to changes in borders Administrative of the emergence of the Iraqi state and so far». He explained that «the bill and duty to respond and rejection for many reasons in the forefront of ambiguity texts where it came from general and vague and not fit to be legal provisions». He Jubouri »If paragraph (b of Article 58) of the Code of the transitional phase is constitutional article only allows reshuffle on the administrative border, the President of the Republic is not the entity authorized to make recommendations so special by its provisions, which limited the task of the Presidential Council and identified his powers in this matter by following one of three mechanisms identified by the same article », stressing that this Council was completed at this stage Constitutional according to article (138 / I) of the Constitution ». and stressed that« it impossible to execute Article 58 stage to Article 140, without a constitutional amendment whereby the appointment of the alternative presidential council handles Multi history milled Kogel final implementation of Article 140 ».
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
