Home
Palm - The leader of the Kurdistan Alliance, Mahmoud Othman, that U.S. forces do not concern them the sovereignty of Iraq as much as interested in staying there to keep their interests, while considered that Talabani's comments in this regard were based on reports of Iraqi military, he noted that repeated violations of Iran, Turkey, Iraq's sovereignty must U.S. forces protected.
Osman said in a media statement: The U.S. forces do not affect them as much as the sovereignty of Iraq to stay interested in it to maintain its interests, noting that there is American pressure on the Iraqis to the survival of some of its troops in Iraq to keep their interests and not for his defense.
Osman added that the position of President Jalal Talabani, the readiness of Iraqi forces came under Iraqi military reports, noting that the military reports to the presidencies of the Republic and the government show the readiness of Iraqi forces, and they are able to maintain internal security, but without water and the sky of Iraq.
He was President Jalal Talabani, announced Wednesday, that the reports of leaders of Iraqi military confirms the inability of Iraqi forces to protect the air, sea and border after the withdrawal of the U.S. military, as referred to the need for the Iraqis to the presence of U.S. trainers on modern weapons, he stressed that the Kurdish leadership tends to keep a limited number of U.S. forces at least in the disputed areas.
Othman continued that it is the duty of protecting American forces from violating the sovereignty of Iraq, Iran and Turkey, called on U.S. forces explanations for acquiescence to violations of the Iranian, Turkish and Kuwait to Iraq.
Osman and wondered if you stay a part of U.S. forces Iraqi politicians can maintain the sovereignty of Iraq, especially its land borders.
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said, the middle of this month, that Iraq needs a number of U.S. trainers to develop Iraqi security forces on the back of buying weapons, air, land and sea from the United States, while noting that the political blocs did not disclose its opinion on the survival or the withdrawal of troops U.S. end of this year, pointed out that Washington wanted to keep part of its forces.
And oscillating statements Iraqi politicians on the survival of part of the U.S. forces in the country after 2011, between acceptance and rejection or acceptance of shy, with the loading of some blocks blocks other decision-making responsibility, as a senior leader of the coalition of state law Hassan Sinead, 19, last June, that the survival of or the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq is not, however, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, but, however, the Council of Ministers of blocs of political, calling the last to take a unified position on this matter, and MP for the coalition of state law and Walid al-Hilli, 25, last June, that Iraq needed for the survival of U.S. forces symbolic of the airspace and protection of Kirkuk and other areas subject to approval by the House of Representatives.
In contrast, the Sadrists announced on June 28 last, he would reject any decision taken by the Parliament on the extension of U.S. forces in Iraq, and stressed the leader of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, Adnan Mufti, the need for U.S. forces in Iraq beyond the end of 2011 the current, the rule that the Iraqi state is still not integrated, and that a large majority of political parties acknowledge and support the survival of these forces.
The head of the Iraqi Council of Representatives Osama Najafi said, on June 23 last, that the stay of U.S. forces in Iraq depends on the agreement of the political blocs in accordance with the requirement of government.
Iraq has signed and the United States, in 2008, the Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from the strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security, based on reducing the number of reconstruction teams in the provinces, as well as provide an important sustainable rule of law, including police development program and the completion of the coordination and supervision and the report of the Fund of Iraq relief and reconstruction.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington at the end of November 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq no later than December 31 of this year, after it withdrew U.S. combat forces under the Convention of the cities, villages and towns Iraq June 30, 2009 in the past.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
