Home
Minister Kurds are boycotting the government in Baghdad to while taking a final position of the budget
11/3/2013 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add a comment -
Erbil - as Francis Monday March 11, 2013 revealed Kurdish minister in the Iraqi government that the ministers and the heads of the Kurdish groups in Baghdad wait issuance official position and final regarding the adoption of the federal budget released in a second meeting in the coming days to return to the capital, while threatened presidency of the region to take a stand «open to all options» and carried Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki responsible for the consequences. described presidency of the region after a meeting on Saturday evening, headed by Masoud Barzani with ministers and heads of Kurdish blocs in the Iraqi parliament, the adoption of the federal budget in the absence of the Kurds and the «Iraqi List», as « step devote division », and stressed that« will be a meeting of representatives of the Kurdish forces in Baghdad to take a position that is in harmony with our aspirations, and work to prevent passing approach bullying and devote policy monopoly and exclusion, and broad consultations with all the parties and forces and components to crystallize the position is open to all options to reach option which protects democratic Iraq, and end the case unilaterally and adventure ». said Trade Minister Kurdish federal government Khairallah Babiker, who participated in the meeting to the newspaper «Kordestani Noi» the mouthpiece of the party of President Jalal Talabani said that «representatives of the blocks and the ministers Kurds will not go to the Baghdad, and wait issuance position Kurd official final meeting during the next few days ». explained a senior lawmaker for «Democratic Party» in the Kurdish parliament Abdul Salam Berwari told «life» that «the issue is not related to the adoption of the budget as it relates to the nature of government in Baghdad, and Barzani stressed repeatedly on concerns of orientation of government in Baghdad to exclusivity and up to one-man rule, and the events of the past months, and most recently the adoption of the budget, has proved this haphazard approach. It seems that the laws be approved majority, which means marginalizing partners in government, and the abolition of the links between the Kurds and the Iraqi with the state law, and the position of presidency of the region was clear and the options list », without specifying the nature of these options. explained «imposed on the region penalty clauses, which export oil a rate of 250 thousand barrels per day, against the payment of dues to companies, and if you do not reach this rate is reduced allocations, while the region which is no different from any Iraqi region and obliged to pay those dues, why exclude, and how they want to continue in production. He added that «Maliki received the wrong signals from foreign countries, similar misconception of Saddam Hussein at the time of Ambassador U.S. before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, and how else can we explain this escalation». MP said the bloc «change» in the Kurdish parliament, which boycotted the vote on the federal budget Governor Sheikh Latif told «life»: «In my personal opinion that the benefits of the Kurds in this budget is better than its predecessors, was approved 17 percent of the size of the budget of the province, was double the money allocated to the Commission of constitutional article 140 of the 172 billion to 325 billion dinars, was maintain the previous rate of allocations Peshmerga. With regard to oil, the text refers to the need to pay the federal government $ 750 billion to companies as an advance, and will be paid the remaining pending outcome audit ». pointed out that «the objectors can offer appeals to the Federal Court, and I think it's the perfect solution». And the possibility of direct Region towards the option of economic independence as board some Kurdish MPs, considered cute that «this depends on the elements of power possessed by the region and guarantees available, and how to allow surrounding countries to export oil and world price, and not through the auction, the fact that the region is not an independent state. These countries will try to share the value of sales in light of the lack of the region to oil infrastructure. Then you will continue to do so, or to change its position will change their interests? ». life
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
