Home
Sadr bloc announced its refusal to request the survival of Maliki's U.S. trainers
SUNDAY, JULY 31, 2011 13:22
Twilight / announced the Liberal block of the Sadrist movement led by Muqtada al-Sadr, on Sunday, its rejection of "absolute" to the survival of the power of American-trained Iraqi army after 2011, indicating at the same time the existence of "violations" and "violations" of U.S. and clear the security agreement with Iraq.
The Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki announced yesterday, Saturday, at a news conference at the conclusion of a closed session of the Council of Representatives said that Iraq will not extend the survival of U.S. forces in the country, and that will instead keep the number of trainers to help develop the capabilities of Iraqi forces, pointing to the that the decision to use U.S. trainers "do not need to authenticate the House of Representatives, but it is the prerogative of the government."
The MP said the Liberal block Jawad Jubouri in an interview ( twilight ) "The Sadrists reject the U.S. presence in Iraq, a rejection at all," pointing out that "the U.S. presence does not accept to be in Iraq in any way, but the title being colonized and the presence of the occupier" .
He Jubouri that "follow the way the U.S. administration in the management of the issue of relations with Iraq, it finds the always unfair and a lot of exaggeration, and a violation of international laws and a violation of the bilateral relations," in reference to the U.S. bombing of areas in the Babil and Maysan individually, and use live ammunition against civilian targets.
The Chairman of the Commission on Security and Defense parliamentary Hassan Sinead, said the U.S. forces in the provinces of Babil and Maysan violated the security agreement, and to act unilaterally bombed areas on the ground, Iraqi artillery air (aircraft), and throw some bombs light (torches), which led to the occurrence of damage, indicating that this is a violation because it was individually without coordination with the Iraqi security forces.
And the Sadrist lawmaker that "the normalization of the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq came under the security agreement with the political forces, which welcomed them or have them or came to them," stressing that "the Americans began to violate the Convention for the remarkable and exceed the items, and this is evidence that these driven things superficially under the title of the conventions, or entitled to respect the rule of a political system and respect for the state. "
He Jubouri that "the reality of the situation indicates that Americans are dealing in colonial and provocative than the dignity and sovereignty of the political system, let alone exceeded the security and dignity of the Iraqi citizen," returned the matter "very clear in the accounts and the equation of the Sadrists, but this comes the rejection of any form of U.S. presence either normalization or deal. "
The cleric Moqtada al-Sadr warned last April, of the consequences of non-withdrawal of U.S. troops on schedule to begin late this year, threatening to activate the Mahdi Army's activities against those forces, after he had suspended the decision of him in years.
Iraq is gripped by the end of the current force of a Convention of the military with the United States of America, with a divergence of views between the political blocs between supporters and opponents of the decision to extend the Convention, in light of reports of non-readiness of Iraqi forces to manage the security file in the country, particularly the land borders, sea and air.
The United States of America has shown its desire to keep some of its troops in Iraq to provide services to the Iraqi security forces in terms of technical, logistical, and according to the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington, the U.S. military is supposed to withdraw the remainder of his forces and number about 47 thousand by the end of 2011.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
SUNDAY, JULY 31, 2011 13:22
Twilight / announced the Liberal block of the Sadrist movement led by Muqtada al-Sadr, on Sunday, its rejection of "absolute" to the survival of the power of American-trained Iraqi army after 2011, indicating at the same time the existence of "violations" and "violations" of U.S. and clear the security agreement with Iraq.
The Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki announced yesterday, Saturday, at a news conference at the conclusion of a closed session of the Council of Representatives said that Iraq will not extend the survival of U.S. forces in the country, and that will instead keep the number of trainers to help develop the capabilities of Iraqi forces, pointing to the that the decision to use U.S. trainers "do not need to authenticate the House of Representatives, but it is the prerogative of the government."
The MP said the Liberal block Jawad Jubouri in an interview ( twilight ) "The Sadrists reject the U.S. presence in Iraq, a rejection at all," pointing out that "the U.S. presence does not accept to be in Iraq in any way, but the title being colonized and the presence of the occupier" .
He Jubouri that "follow the way the U.S. administration in the management of the issue of relations with Iraq, it finds the always unfair and a lot of exaggeration, and a violation of international laws and a violation of the bilateral relations," in reference to the U.S. bombing of areas in the Babil and Maysan individually, and use live ammunition against civilian targets.
The Chairman of the Commission on Security and Defense parliamentary Hassan Sinead, said the U.S. forces in the provinces of Babil and Maysan violated the security agreement, and to act unilaterally bombed areas on the ground, Iraqi artillery air (aircraft), and throw some bombs light (torches), which led to the occurrence of damage, indicating that this is a violation because it was individually without coordination with the Iraqi security forces.
And the Sadrist lawmaker that "the normalization of the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq came under the security agreement with the political forces, which welcomed them or have them or came to them," stressing that "the Americans began to violate the Convention for the remarkable and exceed the items, and this is evidence that these driven things superficially under the title of the conventions, or entitled to respect the rule of a political system and respect for the state. "
He Jubouri that "the reality of the situation indicates that Americans are dealing in colonial and provocative than the dignity and sovereignty of the political system, let alone exceeded the security and dignity of the Iraqi citizen," returned the matter "very clear in the accounts and the equation of the Sadrists, but this comes the rejection of any form of U.S. presence either normalization or deal. "
The cleric Moqtada al-Sadr warned last April, of the consequences of non-withdrawal of U.S. troops on schedule to begin late this year, threatening to activate the Mahdi Army's activities against those forces, after he had suspended the decision of him in years.
Iraq is gripped by the end of the current force of a Convention of the military with the United States of America, with a divergence of views between the political blocs between supporters and opponents of the decision to extend the Convention, in light of reports of non-readiness of Iraqi forces to manage the security file in the country, particularly the land borders, sea and air.
The United States of America has shown its desire to keep some of its troops in Iraq to provide services to the Iraqi security forces in terms of technical, logistical, and according to the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington, the U.S. military is supposed to withdraw the remainder of his forces and number about 47 thousand by the end of 2011.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
