Home
Tareq al-Hashemi: Iran requests .. Orders in Baghdad
09.04.2013 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add a comment -
Mustafa Desouki - Middle East said Tareq al-Hashemi, Vice President of the Republic of Iraq's past, in dialogue with the «Middle East», in the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of former President Saddam Hussein, that after ten years shows that harvesting the invasion, and then occupation, was «harvest bitter», since stalled development programs and campaigns have failed reconstruction programs because of the prevalence of «corruption unprecedented» in the history of Iraq and the world. revealed Hashemi unveiled that he will return to Iraq as soon get rid of any of the provinces Almentvdh what he called «terrorism (Prime Minister) Nuri al-Maliki and his grip iron in order to ensure equitable litigation. He continued the vice president - sentenced to death in absentia on terrorism-related charges - that came out of the ordeal many lessons, which reconsidered his vision for many Muslim women and convictions Since the beginning of political action. On the other hand, describes the Anbar uprising as' spring Iraqi paves the way for real change, stressing that it «national uprising nonsectarian represents all Iraqis. He accused al-Hashemi, currently residing in Turkey, the Maliki government of sectarianism, and added that Iraq has turned in the reign of al-Maliki from the Protector of the eastern gate to the source is a real threat to Arab national security, especially the security and stability of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The following is the text of the interview: * In your opinion, what the most important achievements of Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein? - perhaps the presence of the parties and a permanent constitution and an elected government and parliament monitors the performance and civil society organizations ... And to what extent a free press, and the prosperity and improved living conditions in the Kurdistan region. But in return, is still a culture of tyranny tyrant, and still overlapping security policy and clear, and add to that the prevalence of injustice, corruption and loss of sovereignty. Ten years after the overthrow of the former regime, I can assure you that the harvest of the invasion of Iraq was a bitter harvest. Ten years later, stumbled and development programs failed campaigns reconstruction programs because of the prevalence of corruption, which is unprecedented, not only in the history of Iraq and the world .... I am not exaggerating at all, and enough evidence classification «Transparency International which ranked Iraq in his list within the four most corrupt countries in the world ... And on top of that government protects the corrupt and venal leaders. In this particular regard, I refer you to the statements issued by Judge Rahim Ugaili former chief of integrity as well as statements MP Sabah al-Saadi. * Why pretend Sunni provinces after ten years from the fall of Saddam? How silent revolutionaries today for decades during the rule of the Baath? Indeed, the provincial opposition to the rule of al-Maliki did not move a muscle during the popular uprising in 91 despite Shi'ites of injustice and oppression, and Kurds exposure to a war of extermination. Then specialists observers say today that Iraq today but suffers excessive democracy and pluralism and freedom of the media, and therefore, there is no room to accuse the current government of sectarianism and dictatorship?! What's your comment on that? - if proven at the time, through the course of events on the ground, that the target is the system alone and not the state ... Note that the facts indicate otherwise, if possible immunization activity of any Iranian interference .. This was not the case at all, if possible coordination and consultation early, maybe the situation was different. But in all cases, we believe the change and reject tyranny and oppression, wherever it comes from, but we are patriots and Houdarion not Makavilliyn. There have been many attempts to change the system, and this is enough to indicate the position and relieve us of the charge. One did not survive from the oppression of the former regime .. But injustice was unjustly years, included everyone without exception. I mention here that the previous regime was not sectarian, as evidenced by the 39 leading member of the Ba'ath Party leadership, which was distributed administration names on the list of required judicial figures on the eve of the invasion of Iraq were Shiites! So where marginalization and exclusion that complain about him day and night?! By contrast, to announce Dawa Party How Time employees year in the army and the intelligence and security services and the ministries of higher education, interior and foreign affairs and justice and other ministries, many of which closed on Shiites only. God, if published facts shocked the world, including Nuri al-Maliki did. Yes ... Under the previous regime total exposure of injustice, but the injustice of the current system beyond that to a large extent .. The selective injustice and sectarian orientation and is tantamount to cleansing and genocide against humanity. * How do you rate the Anbar uprising? Is considered an introduction to «Spring Iraqi mother of a sectarian coup elected government? - Anbar uprising is a real spring Iraqis paves the way for change. This is a national uprising nonsectarian represents all Iraqis, was launched from the womb of real suffering from injustice, oppression and discrimination. We are continuing to the end of the half until a goal is realized, and will not back down in front of threats (Nuri) al-Maliki or terrorism repressive apparatus, and will not weaken our resolve or affected our before procrastination Maliki or prevarication or Mrogath that he knew. * What is your role in the 'uprising'? Are you thinking of repatriation in the event of the fall of the Maliki? - intifada her privacy and independence as representing a popular mobility, however I am not far from what happened or is happening, after he offered my services and hired my experiences and my public relations and put at its disposal. I will come back soon to get rid of any of the governorates Almentvdh six of terrorism-Maliki and his iron grip and surest litigation just to appear before the court. * After more than ninety days of the start of «intifada», how do you see the future? - Change holds even after a while, and this promise. 'Intifada' has today - thank God - all the requirements of success. What we need localization, internationalization and then, if they come to a dead end ... This is very possible. Recognizing the significance of the order, addressed the Arab leaders and presidents during their recent summit in Doha, also closing statement general references, but apply to the issue of Iraq and supports popular movement ... I will build it to expand the circle of Arab interest in the uprising. And the presence of Qatar in the rotating presidency is a good omen and Bishara good. I feel completely that the internal voltage must reinforce external interest provides the required support in various fields ... I really active in this direction for my conviction that a long and costly battle. * What is your assessment of the Prime Minister's position on the demands of the opposition squares? - Maliki did not deal with al-Intifada seriously. Did not act as a statesman, and therefore is not expected to respond to the legitimate demands. Notice how that instead of visiting the provinces Almentvdh and meet activists from coordinating committees Vihaor with them face to face in the hope of an agreement, he went to Basra to meet there with representatives of the Shiite-dominated provinces and Ahacdha against provinces with a Sunni Arab majority. It meets conservatives, not consulted or seeks help in solving a national disease ... No, never, but to threaten and thunders and singing the charges and request the support and support for its heavy-handed approach. How to be sectarian informed of it?! Maliki is betting on time, which is thought to be «intifada» weaken even fade over time, like «revolution twenty-fifth of February 2011» which finished off by using excessive force, associated with a campaign of assassinations long prominent activists where pistols equipped بكواتم sound, including journalist Hadi al-Mahdi. But this 'Intifada' will weaken and will not retreat. This will not happen because we are aware of the heavy price we pay later got it .... We know how to behave Maliki, especially as the information leaked from his inner circle that the al-Maliki waits a moment refraction will rebelling so-called militia, formed recently, confiscating governorates Almentvdh and writing last chapters of the plot to eliminate the Sunni Arabs in Iraq ... From here, begins to change. * insist on accusing Maliki of sectarianism .. What are the reasons behind such accusations? - Nouri al-Maliki even recognized by sectarian Shiite leaders, but with closer to power and worship in surmounted slaughter opponents and opponents of whatever race or creed. By, introduces himself to the Shiites as a savior ... Assume personal Mukhtar bin Mohammed Thaqafi pro Husayn and slay year as Noesb, killing is permissible ... As well as the displacement and impoverishment and marginalization and exclusion and denigration of their dignity, but it is a religious duty. Thus justify Maliki for his community campaign that did not stop targeting since 2006 against Sunni Arabs. On top of that, and cling to power ... He will not be allowed to Shiite that rivaled the power and prestige. In this context, introduces himself to the Iraqi people that the national jealous best interests of Iraq, why not a targeted capital Shiite rivals?! The truth is that obsessively driven power is not, and this is the origin of the dispute with «Sadrists and the Supreme Council 'and' call - Iraq Organization ... Etc., etc. even within his own party, and had reached the secretariat of Dawa Party and the maximum Ibrahim al-Jaafari of fraud. And I have seen at the time of the document, saying in this regard, and when confronted Maliki militia Mahdi Army in 2007-2008, it was not driven by a national, but an authoritarian ... For dominance of the Shiite house no more, no less, and is mistaken who thinks otherwise. * What are the main lessons learned from the plight Adthamkm terrorism, which you place them almost a year ago? - has emerged from the ordeal with lessons many of which were prepared to consider my vision as well as in Many Muslim and convictions that shaped my attitude and my relationships over the years, and particularly since it began political work as a public figure. One of these lessons, it should not be responding to pressure by my brothers .. And agree to the leadership of 'Islamic Party' in 2004 even guarantee a minimum of success is not available, but we dreamed it would be achieved over time and that did not happen, and proved that the decision was a risk is calculated results. Then the trust and confidence of the parties to the political process, both national and foreign, were replaced at all. In short, it was a very difficult task ... But much larger than the energies. And there is a lot I will talk with him at the appropriate time. * You say that Iran tamper with the security of Iraq .. Can you separate this aspect more? - I think that al-Maliki has become a tool of Iran in the implementation of the agenda, not only at the national level, but also at the regional level. Noticed his position about the slaughter of the Syrian people, and through its support of the regime of Bashar militias and means of destruction and killing, caravan and money, whether from Iran or Iraq, uninterrupted toward Damascus ... This advertiser and known, but hidden, Iraq shift from «protector of the eastern gate to the source is a real threat to Arab national security .. Especially for the security and stability of the GCC countries, and we have in this area documented information, unimpeachable. Maliki provides services to Iran, not only driven by a culture of intolerance per doctrine, but to swap with Iranian backing, is urgently needed, to stay in office. So, it is no longer limited to intervene, but worsened and become lost influence with the independence, sovereignty, and became Iran and not other orders Vitaa .. Iran's influence complexity and crept into all aspects of the Iraqi state and its activities, especially at the levels of security, politics and culture, the official and popular. And I'm here to warn the Arab and Islamic countries of Iran's soft power and sweet rhetoric the esoteric and positions, and humanitarian programs suspicious employed by maliciously and guile to control and influence. What happened in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Bahrain ... Even in Pakistan and Afghanistan, should be an eloquent lesson for all. Wherever Iran's influence, become a national problem. Yes, it is regrettable that Iraq, through the Arab invasion and negligence and relaxing, turning from the eastern gate guard, his mission to protect the Arab nation from the expansion of Iran ... To claw Iran to harm his fellow Arabs. * So, you are not comfortable with the position of the Iraqi government of the Syrian revolution? - disgraceful government's position .. Iraqi government in this file reproduces the positions of state «velayat-e faqih in its foreign policy, and thus Arab singing outside the flock. This is stark evidence of dependency Iraq to Iran, although the Iraqi interest requires commitment to the unified Arab position that crystallized in the Baghdad summit in 2012. Not to mention that Iraq's position is nothing wrong even morally .. How can Maliki government claims that the Arab Spring began originally from Iraq in 2003 and in the same time supporting Iraq today is a tyrant in the killing of people looking to change. For this, the position of the Iraqi Foreign Ministry in the Doha summit matter of surprise and disapproval Arabs as a whole, and bears Minister Hoshyar Zebari, a great responsibility in this situation. No use flimsy excuses given by the Syrian coalition to change the belief that Iraq's foreign policy, including allowing money laundering, as well as convoys of murder and destruction of Iran by land, air, actually contribute to prolonging the suffering of the heroic people of Syria. I think that the Syrian people will never forget the position of the Maliki government and those involved with him, and the Syrian Kurds now feel ashamed and embarrassed in front of their colleagues in the revolution of position Minister Zebari harmonious with Iran and al-Maliki's position and Hezbollah .. And is consistent with the principled position of regional president Massoud Barzani. * I understand from your words that Iraq is a threat to Arab national security .. Right? - this is actually the case. True situation constitutes a threat to Arab national security, but at the same time is not in favor of Iran in the long run. Perhaps what happened solicitation was smart to reveal its hidden agenda in the invasion of the Arab world .. This time,, persisted Iran, not to use military force which broke in 1988 thanks to the Iraqis Championship, but using soft power .. And Iran in this field shrewd and school, but nevertheless did not hesitate in waving military arsenal from which threaten the near and long term. Must feel that Iran extended by Iraq's expensive and hefty price tag, and its interest to tend to their internal concerns and leave their neighbors to live in peace without the tutelage of one. And the Arabs to move, and not wait to stand up other task ... In this area, there are many options. * What's the impact on the Iraqi internal situation and national unity in the country? - Maliki authoritarian approach on the one hand, and sectarian on the other hand, spent the opportunities brotherly coexistence in one nation .. Spent on the unity of hearts, and in a situation thus becomes the task of maintaining the unity of the land difficult. Darkness and mismanagement, shook the feeling of belonging to the homeland, and forced millions to migration and asylum. Maliki's only goal, is to stay as long as possible in power do not care about anything else. It activates a policy of 'divide and rule, and employs polarized power to target opponents. We have subjected the Shiite National Alliance prevailed and terrorism .... And tight on everyone only bow his loyalty and obedience. Notice how the weakest nemesis «Supreme Council» hard «Badr Brigade» him, and noticed what he did b «Sadrists» and trying to weaken hard-«League of the Righteous», and it does the same thing with «Iraq» intimidating or carrots, and do the same thing with the Kurds ... And his tool in this area of Iran. All of his political opponents, are for him are legitimate targets. But on the other hand, the al-Maliki, for electoral reasons, touting himself as the protector of the doctrine of Naasibis!! So, to draw near to our brothers the Shiites, but noticed .. Electricity service is no better or subsistence congratulate or seat cleaner or schools serving the finest health or security tight .. Neither, but by harming Sunni Arabs and crush them, including amounts to cleansing confessional, which now takes forms of severe oppression and marginalization, murder, deportation and humiliation and starvation no longer patience it is possible, this is why the six provinces to rise. I rebelled because of the policies Maliki disastrous .... So now Iraq is at a crossroads, and all possibilities are open. * What your analysis to the decision to postpone local elections scheduled on 20 April the current provinces of Anbar and Nineveh, for security reasons? - when they do not abide by the ruling Constitution and laws window ... It is the constitution and law and order, it analyzes what he wants and denied what he wants. How, then, be tyranny? Decision void and unconstitutional .. He politicized and tendentious, and I invite provinces to reject the response, but to address the firm has, and the holding of elections in the scheduled time for all of Iraq's provinces. * One last question: Why is this difference between the cadres coalition «Iraq», between supporters and opponents, on the issue of the withdrawal of Ministers list of government to put pressure on al-Maliki? - if Al-Iraqiya is not much different from if other coalitions. All subjected to fragmentation and fission, but there are members of the Al-Iraqiya proved they Near disciplined and committed to the decisions of leadership .... This is unfortunate and has its causes, and talk long. But in my opinion, what compensates for this weakness is the uprising of the masses «Iraq» in the fields of pride and dignity in the six provinces, which initiated and took determination and broke the barrier of fear .. It will work on grade purification and excreted between owners of the real issue and came to Al-Iraqiya in pursuit of prestige or benefit.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
