Home
Iraqi politicians ignore the April 9 after they had declared 10 years ago «feast of liberation»
09.04.2013 | (Voice of Iraq) - Add a comment -
Baghdad: Hamza Mustafa - the Middle East in May of 2003, after less than a month on the invasion of Iraq by U.S. forces, he went former U.S. President George W. Bush to the United Nations requesting b «the greatness of the tongue» considered what happened to Iraq, which was launched in the Iraqi community then 'liberation of Iraq' on it 'occupation'. Indeed the UN Security Council passed resolution 1483, which he considered what was done by the United States and Great Britain occupation under international law. The Bush and Blair Mbrrathma legal and procedural especially at the level of responsibility for Iraq as a nation under occupation. Iraqi political class have had another position than what happened boils tale fall of Saddam Hussein after 35 years of rule and they see that the process of falling resounding this what they could have You get to not «strong role» of the opposition in the process of falling and therefore wanted to celebrate this day as a day immortal in the history of Iraq, and that there is among the members of the Governing Council of the student as a national holiday for Iraq. , but in July 2003, after the formation of the Governing Council Among the unthinkable feat for him to make the ninth day of April a public holiday. After eight years of considered an official holiday the government of Nuri al-Maliki decided to cancel the holiday and consider this a normal day for the official time. But Kurdistan decided to celebrate this day and declared a public holiday. official in the office of Iraqi Prime Minister told «Middle East» provided no reference to the name that «there is a difference between the fall of the joy of everyone to fall certainly among state occupy another country under any pretext» . The «not all opposition forces were with the military option to topple Saddam Hussein's repressive bloody, where she was looking for other means to dislodge even if long-time rather than what happened to occupy and destroy everything», referring to «we fought for the withdrawal of U.S. troops, a What happened, according to the Convention, which was signed in 2008 and the withdrawal in 2012 ». The source explained that «many of those who had Tbloa and Zmarwa against the Americans initially had refused to withdraw and declared by various means their attachment to the Americans asking for their survival so the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq is what should celebrate and not a day occupation regardless of the outcome of each to a drop of the former regime a great result undoubtedly but it was the price too high ». turn, says spokesman block «united» Dhafer al-Ani told «Middle East» that «this day For me is the day of the occupation was preceded by blatant aggression has not received any international legitimacy. And Ani added that «Bush himself before anyone else said that this day is the occupation and secured a resolution from the United Nations in this regard, is that which hurtful to see that at the time it calls the United States occupation, some politicians called liberation This means frankly that Golan was more honorable than some Iraqi politicians ». believes Ani that «paradox striking that the occupier is gone, but the occupation remains as the philosophy of the occupation remain, as some politicians who say America their enemy, clinging to the decision of Bremer and his hands» considering that «the occupier had wanted to divide Iraq and weaken the role of national preserve Israel and tearing Iraq and plunder its riches and all achieved because of what his political, as some of these politicians are more terrible than the occupation, stressing that« Iraq today is unable to defend himself because of what happened during the the years of occupation and reap the fruit of corruption and sabotage, poor services and a breakdown in infrastructure.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
