Home
Representatives retirement
Post 19 August / August 2013 10:17 .
Mohammed Abdul-Jabbar carp
Baghdad Center Brief for the Iraqi Media Network (IMN) - call for the abolition of pensions or even reduce them, for the deputies and the heads of the republic, and even retroactively, very logical; because the salaries are not logical never especially after comparing this issue to their counterparts in other countries around us, and the level of salaries of government employees in Iraq.
In Kuwait, for example, does not distract a member of the National Assembly pension for his service as deputy to the nation. When the end of its membership in the Council for any reason, it was back to doing his job earlier if a civil servant before he elected to membership of the Council or return to the practice of private economic activity.
This talk is reasonable; pension because the right guaranteed by the laws of the State to its employees the conditions prescribed by law and is supposed to be equal to the law among citizens working in the state apparatus. Even before this, the most important question is: Is the MP in the state employee? Not supposed to be the answer is yes. But rather that be the answer to a member of the House of Representatives is not a government employee but is an employee of the society in which tabbed to perform a particular function is deputizing for the society in legislation and oversight over the executive authority of any government. If the letter rogatory has expired and the agency stopped paying his pension rights.
It might be said that conditions in Iraq does not make it possible for the deputy to return to the usual practice of his life after the end of his membership in the House of Representatives. It may be in this speech something of exceptional health that should be taken into account. Accordingly, it is possible to think of compromise between the proper orientation to cancel pension and go to a financial settlement takes into account the current situation that this is an exceptional disappears as soon as the demise of these conditions.
In all cases, be useful at the legislative and legal resolution of this issue legally while subjecting deputies to the unified pension law if it is considered government officials or the abolition of the pension in the first place. In all cases, this would require legislative intervention that the government would offer a bill or that offers a number of deputies proposed law to this effect to be issued the necessary legislation which deals with all aspects of the issue.
About this vital issue can be considered positively to the calls made by some political blocs and the House to waive the pension. These invitations reflect a sense of responsibility and understanding of people's position on this issue. It is assumed that MPs are Precede officials to reverse the wishes of the people they represent.
But logic requires that we say that these calls and concessions is not enough, especially when it is said that it is not legally award. The correct action is to initiate these MPs Proponents of the idea to put the proposed law to remove or edit pensions for MPs. If they do so, this in turn will encourage the government to progress a bill the same subject matter. The second case alone that ensure the achievement of this matter, in light of the legislative contexts used in the country. If you check this, be possible to say we have taken a step toward a rumor of justice in the country and accomplish the desired reform of the political process.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Post 19 August / August 2013 10:17 .
Mohammed Abdul-Jabbar carp
Baghdad Center Brief for the Iraqi Media Network (IMN) - call for the abolition of pensions or even reduce them, for the deputies and the heads of the republic, and even retroactively, very logical; because the salaries are not logical never especially after comparing this issue to their counterparts in other countries around us, and the level of salaries of government employees in Iraq.
In Kuwait, for example, does not distract a member of the National Assembly pension for his service as deputy to the nation. When the end of its membership in the Council for any reason, it was back to doing his job earlier if a civil servant before he elected to membership of the Council or return to the practice of private economic activity.
This talk is reasonable; pension because the right guaranteed by the laws of the State to its employees the conditions prescribed by law and is supposed to be equal to the law among citizens working in the state apparatus. Even before this, the most important question is: Is the MP in the state employee? Not supposed to be the answer is yes. But rather that be the answer to a member of the House of Representatives is not a government employee but is an employee of the society in which tabbed to perform a particular function is deputizing for the society in legislation and oversight over the executive authority of any government. If the letter rogatory has expired and the agency stopped paying his pension rights.
It might be said that conditions in Iraq does not make it possible for the deputy to return to the usual practice of his life after the end of his membership in the House of Representatives. It may be in this speech something of exceptional health that should be taken into account. Accordingly, it is possible to think of compromise between the proper orientation to cancel pension and go to a financial settlement takes into account the current situation that this is an exceptional disappears as soon as the demise of these conditions.
In all cases, be useful at the legislative and legal resolution of this issue legally while subjecting deputies to the unified pension law if it is considered government officials or the abolition of the pension in the first place. In all cases, this would require legislative intervention that the government would offer a bill or that offers a number of deputies proposed law to this effect to be issued the necessary legislation which deals with all aspects of the issue.
About this vital issue can be considered positively to the calls made by some political blocs and the House to waive the pension. These invitations reflect a sense of responsibility and understanding of people's position on this issue. It is assumed that MPs are Precede officials to reverse the wishes of the people they represent.
But logic requires that we say that these calls and concessions is not enough, especially when it is said that it is not legally award. The correct action is to initiate these MPs Proponents of the idea to put the proposed law to remove or edit pensions for MPs. If they do so, this in turn will encourage the government to progress a bill the same subject matter. The second case alone that ensure the achievement of this matter, in light of the legislative contexts used in the country. If you check this, be possible to say we have taken a step toward a rumor of justice in the country and accomplish the desired reform of the political process.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
