Home
Policy Council faces obstacles that may delay the approval
14/08/2011
After the disclosure of items in violation of the Constitution of
Baghdad - morning
For the second week in a row continues attitudes differentiated towards the law of the National Council for the strategic policies the Supreme, which could lead to delays in approval. And announced the National Alliance MP Abbas al-Bayati said the coalition is working on the study of the Law Council policies accurately and carefully and will take him to a common position reflects all the limbs of it, will not passes before the agreement on all details. Bayati said in a statement yesterday received "morning," a copy of it: "The coalition will hold meetings with other political blocs in order to address all the constitutional violations in the strategic policies."
He said al-Bayati: "The National Alliance will not accept the undermining of constitutional institutions in the country, and that the draft law policies aimed at sharing power with the Council of Ministers and this goes the Constitution and the democratic system and the right of the majority in power according to the results of the elections," he said, adding that "the coalition look to the policy perspective far-reaching and momentous than problematic the current stage, and it will not repeat the state of division in the vote, as happened with the Electoral Commission as a result of poor coordination of hand and refused the presidency of the Council of Representatives and the paper agreed to form a committee for the purpose of electing a new commission simultaneously with the withdrawal of confidence from the current commission, which payment of the coalition parties to monopolize the vote. "He said al-Bayati said before the draft Law on the Council policy through a long and tough going until it is approved in the parliament, because the inter violations of constitutional, and there are political blocs many share this view and has custody of the current version of the draft before the parliament." . and the House of Representatives decided yesterday to continue in the legislation of the National Council of the Supreme policies, despite the opposition expressed by many of the deputies of the law and the threat to the Federal Supreme Court, where he finished the first reading of the bill that came in its rationale (based on the political agreement and in view of the urgent need to coordinate and drawing high politics in the state administration in order to achieve participation in the unity of decision, on the basis of dialogues and understandings between the various national forces and the consensus opinion of the need to establish a national council to achieve the goals of national reconciliation and out of the sectarian conflict and creating an appropriate atmosphere for the community welfare).
were made about the first reading of the law of different reactions by the House of Representatives between supporters and opponents of the law, With MP Adnan al-Janabi said the law came to a national necessity after what he has reached the political process of crisis after the parliamentary elections, he drew MP Khalid al-Attiyah said the political process, incomplete, and that all parties represented in the government, noting that not There is a need for this law, which suffers from violations of constitutional. MP Mohsen al-Sadoun has acknowledged the existence of constitutional violations in some paragraphs of the law, but it could be addressed in the second reading. In a related development, MP Abdul Ilah Naieli that all items proposed to organize the work of the Council of strategic policies conflict with the the Constitution includes a clear interference in the work of the three authorities. "We were surprised by our knowledge of the paragraphs set out in the paper on the work of the Council of strategic policies made by the president to parliament, because it is a whole contrary to the Constitution and the clear interference in the work of the three branches of the legislative, executive and judiciary." and Naieli that "this Council a compromise and agreed to by the political blocs within the agreement of Arbil," noting that "the political blocs agreed in Arbil, the composition and not the details." he said in a statement carried by news agency Nina: "The first article of the bill that the Council has given the decisions Council enforceable if it won 80 percent of the vote, and this is contrary to the third paragraph of the first article of the law which stipulates that it must be the work of the Council in accordance with the Constitution and laws, as the Article 78 of the Constitution showed explicitly the terms of reference Prime Minister as the Chief Executive and direct public policy and the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, and therefore give the Council resolutions, policies enforceable inconsistent with the Constitution is what makes all the decisions open to challenge in federal court because they conflict with the exclusive authorities of the Council of Ministers. "
He added by saying: "The second article contrary to the principle Limbering government approved by the government and parliament two weeks ago , considering that the Council's own budget and the Regiment protection and this is a leaner new state institutions. "He pointed out that Article III was also contrary to the provisions of the Constitution because it provided for the powers of the Board in planning and implementing the general policy of the state, and this is incompatible with the provisions of Article 80 of the Constitution," noting that "Article VII, the whole contrary to the Constitution, they allow the Council to intervene in the areas of jurisdiction as stipulated on ensuring the separation of powers between executive, legislative and judicial." He also noted that "Article IV is also contrary to the Constitution, it was stipulated that the areas of work of the Council of strategic policies include policy external public and strategic security, military and financial policy, monetary and energy policies, investment and national reconciliation, human rights, environment and health, as if the whole country will be reduced to the Policy Board, as if it does not exist to the three branches. "In contrast, MP for the Iraqi List Jamal Kilani, the positions of members of a coalition of state law of the draft Law of the National Council of the Supreme policies after reading his first, which revealed rejection of the law of the foundation.
said Kilani in a press statement: "The coalition of state law rejected this draft, with evidence that he was not allowed to read the first since the beginning." He added that "a coalition of state law did not agree on the basis of the law, even at a meeting of leaders of political blocs in the house of President Jalal Talabani, and what was agreed upon at this meeting is to expel the topic of the Council of Representatives. "
More News
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
