Home
Interview with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: Transcript
On Jan. 16, The Post’s Loveday Morris sat down with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. Here is an edited transcript of their interview, translated from Arabic:
MORRIS: Prime Minister, thank you for taking the time to meet me, I know it’s a particularly busy time. As we sit here the army surrounds Fallujah, we have tribesmen fighting al-Qaeda linked militants in Ramadi, a civil war across the border in Syria and elections just around the corner. How critical a time is this for Iraq?
MALIKI: There are different questions there, but all are connected to each other. The situation in Anbar and Iraq generally, is also connected to the situation in Syria, and the situation in Syria is also connected to the situation in Iran and Lebanon. The whole region’s events are connected. To solve the problem in Iraq we cannot look at it in isolation from other events in the region.
Al-Qaeda in Iraq was finished in 2008 and 2009 but they came back after the situation erupted in Syria. The base for fighting Al-Qaeda in Iraq is better than in Syria. Despite what some politicians say - they are lying - right now all the Iraqi people are fighting Al-Qaeda. As evidence of that, the tribes of Anbar decided to ask the government to fight Al -Qaeda and right now their sons are fighting Al-Qaeda. We are satisfied that we will achieve victory against Al-Qaeda, but the concern is there are some lines connecting Al Qaeda here to Syria. Still, we have achieved progress against them.
On the elections, we are working very hard to ensure the stability of them, and, if God wills, the date of the election will be on time. Two things will help us. The first is unity to fight Al-Qaeda. The second is the support of international community.
On Anbar, you have said you will not send the armed forces into Fallujah, is that still the case and are we likely to see a military effort by pro-government tribesmen imminently?
Yes, the tribes will get rid of Al-Qaeda by themselves. There is movement in Fallujah, but right now, Fallujah is under siege. We can enter Fallujah but we are afraid of civilian casualties. If we wanted, we could enter Fallujah in a day. We need to give Fallujah the time to be able get rid of al-Qaeda and expel them from the city, we will get them outside the city. We don’t want to bring any harm to our people in Fallujah.
If the tribes need anything, weapons, money, logistics. We will supply it.
What kind of military support has been given to the tribes?
Light weapons, AKs and PKCs, 12.5mm machine guns. We are not giving tanks and artillery. It’s not heavy.
These weapons, they are being used and being used successfully, plus we have the Iraqi army supporting them. In the difficult areas we have the army near. In any areas that the tribes cannot fight al-Qaeda we have counter terrorism there.
What support is Iraq receiving from the U.S. and what more would they like to see?
To build the Iraqi army and protect Iraqi sovereignty we need heavy weapons, fighter jets, helicopters, air defenses, this is in the long term. But right now, to defeat al-Qaeda, we need medium weapons, and we need intelligence cooperation. We need drones to scan the desert, and right now that’s gradually happening with America.
Can you give specific details? Has the U.S. pledged more support?
We’ve received only Hellfire missiles, which are being used to fight al-Qaeda. We’ve received one wave and have been promised another. The other weapons we have requested we have not received yet. The surveillance drones we have used them once or twice in the desert. There is intelligence collaboration which is very important for us.
What kind of intelligence is shared?
It’s tapping al-Qaeda communications, finding their camps and places on the ground, observing their routes over the borders. We work together on that field but we need more cooperation. We have many agreements with other countries to share information, but on the U.S. side we have the Status of Forces Agreement, under that framework we are exchanging more information than with most countries.
Do you wish you had done more to keep a U.S. military presence in Iraq, given the fact that al-Qaeda are strengthening and taking ground?
Now we have a strong army, the only thing we need is intelligence information, and that sharing already exists under our agreement with the U.S. There is no need for the US army on the ground, because we have our army.
So no regrets in not allowing U.S. forces to stay?
No. Since American withdrawal we’ve had a friendly relationship, but this strong bilateral relationship doesn’t mean we need American forces here.
In an interview in 2009 you declared that sectarian war was over in Iraq, things looked hopeful then. Do you still think that’s the case?
The sectarian war in Iraq was finished, but al-Qaeda brought it back and it was exported to Iraq by another Arab country. Al-Qaeda is responsible for bringing the sectarian issues to Iraq. Now the sectarian situation is very good and there is good relationship between Sunni and Shia. Our problem is not between Sunni and Shia, it’s with al-Qaeda itself. As evidence of that you can see those killed on the Sunni side are not less than the Shia.
Al-Qaeda is the one using sectarian issues. It is trying to erupt sectarian issues. The purpose is to drag Sunni and Shia into fighting with each other.
Is it not the case that as well as al-Qaeda you are also facing insurrection from the tribes themselves in Anbar?
There is no full tribe with Al-Qaeda, but members of the tribes, yes. Some of the tribes are divided, into for al-Qaeda and against. But the majority of the tribes in Anbar are against Al-Qaeda.
Do you not think more could be done to address disenfranchisement in the Sunni community? What is being done to do that? Are you reviving the Sahwa movement?
Our first priority is to fight al-Qaeda and the insurgency all over the provinces. Secondly, we are going to count on their sons, under the title of sons of Iraq and Sahwas. Thirdly, we are going to use the sons of these provinces to take care of security in their provinces.
After that we are going to provide services and infrastructure for provinces which are fed up with al-Qaeda control.
Could more not be done to take away al-Qaeda’s recruitment abilities by and bridging Shia-Sunni divides?
I don’t like to hear Iraqi Sunni and Iraqi Shia. The Sunni they trust that the government is not sectarian, it’s just some politicians that thrive on sectarian issues.
The evidence for this is that when we had the Shia militas, Sadrists, in Basra, Karbala and Baghdad, the government stood against the Shia militias, it showed the Sunnis we not a attacking the Sunnis, we are imposing the law.
I think this policy is the only way to keep the unity of Iraq, but I’m sorry that some politicians always erupt the sectarian issue. And Arab countries that neighbor Iraq use it, and I think those countries will face unrest because they also have Sunni and Shia in their countries.
I believe Iraq is an unsuitable environment for sectarianism, except in some politics. Our tribes have both Sunni and Shia, they are cousins, married, they have a good relations.
When do you expect Ramadi and Fallujah back in government control?
Right now Ramadi is in the hands of the government, there is local government there. But there are still some hideouts in Fallujah. These may take some time, but it’s almost over.
But your soldiers are still suffering losses.
Yes, up to now we lost 80 martyrs from army and police, and more than that from civilian side, and double this number from the insurgency.
You mentioned recruiting Sunnis into security forces, how do you plan to do that, doesn’t trust need to be rebuilt first?
]Definitely. My plan is to take the army out of the provinces, as it says it should be in the constitution, and leave them to local police. The problem right now is that the local police are being infiltrated, and they are not ready. Now that the tribal men have come to fight in a powerful, honest way, that has led us to think that in the future we should rely on them.
We will form a professional security force from them. Those tribesmen fighting al-Qaeda, we are going to bring them and use them in the police to defend their province, and the army will go back to its place outside the city.
How closely are you in touch with the Obama administration on the current crisis? Have you spoken with Obama?
On my visit yes, I met with him, but Mr. Obama told me Mr. Biden is in charge of the Iraqi file. I’m always in touch with Mr. Biden, like 48 hours ago we talked on the phone with him twice. We are in touch, either directly or through the embassy.
Last time you spoke to Mr. Biden, what was discussed?
He told us how Americans feel relief over how the Iraqi army is dealing with demonstration places and the fight against al-Qaeda. The professional way of the Iraqi army has changed the image in the United States of the Iraqi army. He asked me to present a list of the weapons that Iraq needs fast to fight al-Qaeda. And we provided this list.
What exactly was on the list?
Light weapons, medium weapons, which we are going to use to counter the insurgency, some missiles to attack their hideouts and they are working on that.
Have you asked the U.S. for more training for the Iraqi forces?
We need training. Until now we’ve only talked about intelligence information and weapons, not training. We are going to ask for training, in some areas we need training, especially for our counter terrorism units.
Would that involve bringing U.S. trainers here?
Yes, bringing Americans to Iraq, or Iraqi soldiers could go to Jordan and train. A trainer could go to Jordan and come back and train the rest. We have experts, we have abilities in this field, but we want to increase our capability. We don’t mind asking for such a thing, to train our forces in counter terrorism.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
