Home
Head of the Judiciary (Medhat al-Mahmoud) Why do not referred to retire, which is against the law
In all countries of the world there are laws and regulations explaining the mechanism of an employee who works in the public sector recruitment and there are laws and regulations also clarify the assignment to whom the employee, without exception, to retire after reaching the legal age, or any other situation and find out the real it turns out that the head of the judiciary (Medhat al-Mahmoud) law and decisions regarding forwarded to retire had violated upon reaching the legal age and must be reviewed to you dissolved Revolutionary Command Council Resolution No. 162 of 1992 published in the Official Gazette number 3411 on 22.06.1992 to clarify the true witnesses who stated the following: Legislation Title: Extension judge who has completed sixty-third session of the two-year-old service Based on the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article II of the Constitution Forty-Revolutionary Command Council decided what comes Article 1 may be a presidential decree to extend the judge who has completed sixty-third session of the two-year-old service.
Article 2 imperative to refer the judge to retire at sixty-fifth completion of age.
Article 3 may be a presidential decree to extend the service judge in the Court of Cassation, which completed the fifth and sixty years of age for one year, renewable twice
Article 4 provisions of the Revolutionary Command Council Resolution No. 1021 on 31.9.1983 on the judge, who extended his service after the sixty-third complete-old in the case of death or retirement apply.
Article 5 The finished work of judges who have been returned to the judicial work of the Revolutionary Command Council under Resolution No. 58 on 01/17/1988 at the sixty-eighth completion of age.
Article 6 stop work of the Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 58 17/01/1988
Article 7 does not function any provision contrary to the provisions of this resolution
Article 8 of this resolution is implemented from the date of publication in the Official Gazette
After reviewing the biography and the life of Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) published in the judiciary site which was deliberately not to mention the real Mwalidh details of personal considerations and after checking and search turns out the following:
First born 21.09.1933 and after the audit found that all Iraqis who are born before 1957 were recorded restrictions and consider them born 1/7, regardless of any birth month that only Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in Iraq registered Mwalidh 21/9 / 1933 personal considerations
Second, pursuant to the decision of the Revolutionary Command Council dissolved the above, and to clarify the truth to the reader review the following:
1 reach Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in 1996, the legal age of 63 years and the implementation of resolution above article 1 extends for two years that is, it is imperative to allocate to retire upon reaching 65 years of age in the year (1998) on the basis of Article 2 of the above decision
2 were written biography judicial master (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in the judiciary and the site which stated the following:
* Seconded from the judiciary to act as general manager of the care of minors -mash Justice Department, which aims to keep the money and take care of minors to their affairs
* Appointed as the Vice President of the resumption of the Baghdad area / member of the discriminatory civil and then as its chairman.
* Appointed adviser in the State Consultative Council (formerly the Office of Legal Blogging) while retaining his capacity as head of the judiciary and of the Court of Administrative Justice's state associated with the Shura Council and the Ministry of Justice. It is then seconded for the period from 09.18.1995 to 29.06.1996, at the request of the Minister of Former Justice, who was appointed supervisor of the legal department associated Diwan presidency, with ten of senior judges and worked in the Civil Division's department and returned to the judiciary after the termination of its mandate.
* Appointed a judge of the Court of Cassation, through the nomination of the members of the body mentioned in the court unanimously, after the lifting of the former regime appointed to twice without legal reason.
* Commissioned by the former Minister of Justice to act as Chairman of the State Council (formerly the Office of Legal Blogging).
* After the regime change in Iraq in 9/4/2003, and build the majority of the nomination of judges ratios supervisor of the Ministry of Justice to carry out the reorganization of the courts and the perpetuation of the work and oversee the rebuilding of the Ministry of Justice and the rest of the court buildings that were destroyed with Mujdadtha through the creation of 9/4/2003 onwards building .
* Appointed vice-president of the Court of Cassation and then as its chairman and president's (SJC) reconstituted under Resolution No. (35) for the year 2003 and by virtue of that decision.
* After the release of the Iraqi State Administration Law for the transitional period, which provided for the formation of the Federal Supreme Court and reshape (SJC) and name (Supreme Judicial Council) appointed by the Republican National Authority Decree No. (398) dated 30/5/2005 Republican resolution (968 ) issued on 06.27.2005 president of the Federal Supreme Court after his nomination was unanimously of the Supreme Judicial Council by secret vote, and became the de jure head of the Supreme Judicial Council.
After reviewing the above Helms clear visible
1 Mr. Medhat al-Mahmoud has not issued a presidential decree by the regime change in Iraq on 9/4/2003 appointed judge of the Court of Cassation, but through the nomination of the members of the General Assembly in the said court, and this is contrary to the provisions of the Judicial Organization Law No. 160 of 1979 amended
2 If we assume that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) was appointed judge of the Court of Cassation, but has been seconded from the former Minister of Justice to act as Chairman of the Council of State before the regime change in Iraq on 9/4/2003 any Nahz that age (70) year has not been an order by referring to retire despite the entry into force of the dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution above No. 162 of 1992, which strayed valid work done on the basis of the provisions of Article 130 of the Constitution in 2005, which stipulates the applicable legislation in force remain unless annulled or amended in accordance with the provisions of the constitution was abolished dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 162 of 1992 under the Act No. 39 of 2012 published in the Official Gazette number facts of Iraq in 4241 4/6/2012
3 that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) now old has exceeded more than eighty years without proving a medical report supports the ability physical, mental and this Helms in Law No. 39 of 2012 Article II, published in the Official Gazette number 4241 on 04/06/2012 If the answer is that he is not covered by the law as being covered by the law of the Federal Court No. 30 of 2005 published in the Official Gazette number 3996 on 17/3/2005 pursuant to the provisions of Article VI / III thereof, which stipulates that the Chairman and members of the Federal Supreme Court to continue the service without setting an upper age limit, but if he wishes to leave the service.
This is not the logic of justice that the judge 63-year-old, who is referred to retire and the judge who aged 80 years to Aahal to retire as though Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud has made the Federal Court is the judicial power components in the formations of the judiciary means that what comes out of decisions and laws relating to men elimination of consequences and apply provisions of the judges in the Federal Court.
4 that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) done in March Judicial Council since 9/4/2003 until the year 2005 before the issuance of a presidential decree No. (398) dated 30/5/2005 Presidential Decree (968) issued on 06.27.2005 ie it March judicial authority unlawfully or legal justification and prosecute the salaries and allowances as head of the judiciary for two years without formal appointment of the interim government or of the governing council at the time, but was appointed by the nomination of the majority of judges and this is a legal clear violation of the provisions of Law No. 162 of 1992
So go to your Excellency the verification of these express provisions of law violations and the issue of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud for such violations and irregularities and audits Aillarth personal after the request of the Supreme Judicial Council and approached the House Legal Committee and the Integrity Committee and the Finance Committee to identify these violations of the sanctity of justice and law and God Crown success.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
In all countries of the world there are laws and regulations explaining the mechanism of an employee who works in the public sector recruitment and there are laws and regulations also clarify the assignment to whom the employee, without exception, to retire after reaching the legal age, or any other situation and find out the real it turns out that the head of the judiciary (Medhat al-Mahmoud) law and decisions regarding forwarded to retire had violated upon reaching the legal age and must be reviewed to you dissolved Revolutionary Command Council Resolution No. 162 of 1992 published in the Official Gazette number 3411 on 22.06.1992 to clarify the true witnesses who stated the following: Legislation Title: Extension judge who has completed sixty-third session of the two-year-old service Based on the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article II of the Constitution Forty-Revolutionary Command Council decided what comes Article 1 may be a presidential decree to extend the judge who has completed sixty-third session of the two-year-old service.
Article 2 imperative to refer the judge to retire at sixty-fifth completion of age.
Article 3 may be a presidential decree to extend the service judge in the Court of Cassation, which completed the fifth and sixty years of age for one year, renewable twice
Article 4 provisions of the Revolutionary Command Council Resolution No. 1021 on 31.9.1983 on the judge, who extended his service after the sixty-third complete-old in the case of death or retirement apply.
Article 5 The finished work of judges who have been returned to the judicial work of the Revolutionary Command Council under Resolution No. 58 on 01/17/1988 at the sixty-eighth completion of age.
Article 6 stop work of the Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 58 17/01/1988
Article 7 does not function any provision contrary to the provisions of this resolution
Article 8 of this resolution is implemented from the date of publication in the Official Gazette
After reviewing the biography and the life of Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) published in the judiciary site which was deliberately not to mention the real Mwalidh details of personal considerations and after checking and search turns out the following:
First born 21.09.1933 and after the audit found that all Iraqis who are born before 1957 were recorded restrictions and consider them born 1/7, regardless of any birth month that only Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in Iraq registered Mwalidh 21/9 / 1933 personal considerations
Second, pursuant to the decision of the Revolutionary Command Council dissolved the above, and to clarify the truth to the reader review the following:
1 reach Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in 1996, the legal age of 63 years and the implementation of resolution above article 1 extends for two years that is, it is imperative to allocate to retire upon reaching 65 years of age in the year (1998) on the basis of Article 2 of the above decision
2 were written biography judicial master (Medhat al-Mahmoud) in the judiciary and the site which stated the following:
* Seconded from the judiciary to act as general manager of the care of minors -mash Justice Department, which aims to keep the money and take care of minors to their affairs
* Appointed as the Vice President of the resumption of the Baghdad area / member of the discriminatory civil and then as its chairman.
* Appointed adviser in the State Consultative Council (formerly the Office of Legal Blogging) while retaining his capacity as head of the judiciary and of the Court of Administrative Justice's state associated with the Shura Council and the Ministry of Justice. It is then seconded for the period from 09.18.1995 to 29.06.1996, at the request of the Minister of Former Justice, who was appointed supervisor of the legal department associated Diwan presidency, with ten of senior judges and worked in the Civil Division's department and returned to the judiciary after the termination of its mandate.
* Appointed a judge of the Court of Cassation, through the nomination of the members of the body mentioned in the court unanimously, after the lifting of the former regime appointed to twice without legal reason.
* Commissioned by the former Minister of Justice to act as Chairman of the State Council (formerly the Office of Legal Blogging).
* After the regime change in Iraq in 9/4/2003, and build the majority of the nomination of judges ratios supervisor of the Ministry of Justice to carry out the reorganization of the courts and the perpetuation of the work and oversee the rebuilding of the Ministry of Justice and the rest of the court buildings that were destroyed with Mujdadtha through the creation of 9/4/2003 onwards building .
* Appointed vice-president of the Court of Cassation and then as its chairman and president's (SJC) reconstituted under Resolution No. (35) for the year 2003 and by virtue of that decision.
* After the release of the Iraqi State Administration Law for the transitional period, which provided for the formation of the Federal Supreme Court and reshape (SJC) and name (Supreme Judicial Council) appointed by the Republican National Authority Decree No. (398) dated 30/5/2005 Republican resolution (968 ) issued on 06.27.2005 president of the Federal Supreme Court after his nomination was unanimously of the Supreme Judicial Council by secret vote, and became the de jure head of the Supreme Judicial Council.
After reviewing the above Helms clear visible
1 Mr. Medhat al-Mahmoud has not issued a presidential decree by the regime change in Iraq on 9/4/2003 appointed judge of the Court of Cassation, but through the nomination of the members of the General Assembly in the said court, and this is contrary to the provisions of the Judicial Organization Law No. 160 of 1979 amended
2 If we assume that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) was appointed judge of the Court of Cassation, but has been seconded from the former Minister of Justice to act as Chairman of the Council of State before the regime change in Iraq on 9/4/2003 any Nahz that age (70) year has not been an order by referring to retire despite the entry into force of the dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution above No. 162 of 1992, which strayed valid work done on the basis of the provisions of Article 130 of the Constitution in 2005, which stipulates the applicable legislation in force remain unless annulled or amended in accordance with the provisions of the constitution was abolished dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 162 of 1992 under the Act No. 39 of 2012 published in the Official Gazette number facts of Iraq in 4241 4/6/2012
3 that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) now old has exceeded more than eighty years without proving a medical report supports the ability physical, mental and this Helms in Law No. 39 of 2012 Article II, published in the Official Gazette number 4241 on 04/06/2012 If the answer is that he is not covered by the law as being covered by the law of the Federal Court No. 30 of 2005 published in the Official Gazette number 3996 on 17/3/2005 pursuant to the provisions of Article VI / III thereof, which stipulates that the Chairman and members of the Federal Supreme Court to continue the service without setting an upper age limit, but if he wishes to leave the service.
This is not the logic of justice that the judge 63-year-old, who is referred to retire and the judge who aged 80 years to Aahal to retire as though Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud has made the Federal Court is the judicial power components in the formations of the judiciary means that what comes out of decisions and laws relating to men elimination of consequences and apply provisions of the judges in the Federal Court.
4 that Mr. (Medhat al-Mahmoud) done in March Judicial Council since 9/4/2003 until the year 2005 before the issuance of a presidential decree No. (398) dated 30/5/2005 Presidential Decree (968) issued on 06.27.2005 ie it March judicial authority unlawfully or legal justification and prosecute the salaries and allowances as head of the judiciary for two years without formal appointment of the interim government or of the governing council at the time, but was appointed by the nomination of the majority of judges and this is a legal clear violation of the provisions of Law No. 162 of 1992
So go to your Excellency the verification of these express provisions of law violations and the issue of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud for such violations and irregularities and audits Aillarth personal after the request of the Supreme Judicial Council and approached the House Legal Committee and the Integrity Committee and the Finance Committee to identify these violations of the sanctity of justice and law and God Crown success.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
