US approach does not preserve the democratic interests

US approach does not preserve the democratic interests




BAGHDAD / Obelisk: Despite the fact that the United States says it seeks to spread democracy in the world, especially in the Middle East, but it is working non-democratic, as evidenced by events in Iraq since 2003 and was confirmed by the positions of Iran and its relations pro-systems tribal and family dictatorship in the Gulf and the Middle East.

According to a report summarized, "obelisk" from the "Center for Strategic Studies of the compound of the Expediency in Iran," and was written by Mr. Jawad Tahaie, the United States is forced to work in a non-democratic in the Middle East, and except it will face its institutions, and interests, and internal values serious crisis. When politicians talk Americans strictly limit and their interests outside the United States, it is evident that there is a close relationship between the foreign interests of the Western superpower and civilian programs and democracy within that State. But unlike the United States which are forced to work, reverse the policies of internal democracy, the mentality of domination and control is not the mentality of democracy, in its foreign policy, especially in the Middle District East and nearby areas to Iran, but it is incumbent upon Iran to adhere to democracy in its foreign policy towards the region and other surrounding areas. What does it mean if this difference? And how Iran can comply with democracy in its foreign policy in nearby areas?

That peace in the classic and authentic concept is something that does not get through the foreign policies of countries planning, peace and power strategies; it is the result of a long history of coexistence and spontaneous understandings between the clans. Nor is its industry by states, but this is done at the hands of communities. In this case, the responsibility of States and their role is the protection and strengthening peace and not Khalgah.valdol strengthen peace or undermine it.

In spite of this fact in US foreign policy, they are always trying to find peace through Taktitatha; but on the ground, what is the industry stability and discipline imposed, not peace. While Iran on the contrary this case, the terms of reference Belhaz cultural psychological in the region, they have the widest possibilities to find peace (in the meaning inherent).

The report says that translating "cultural reference statement Center for Studies and Planning," the peace that Waitangi from the gradual impact of the central and the nation in the region is of significance and a wider range of military victory effect., Makiola says: (The ultimate goal for the Kings is a victory in war; but peace represents a victory summit) Peace is a victory of the summit, where it contains the fruits of victory Kalnfoz, stability and obtaining and expanding the possibilities of working and free from evil.

The author explains, that the current US policy in the Middle East, in fact, very far from the inherent definition of peace while Iran and from a cultural perspective has a wide range of possibilities for this purpose.

Many believe that the vigilance of the people, and political developments in the Arab and Muslim countries are on the degree of greatness; it will lead to the creation of a new historical period in the political life of the Middle East, but the whole of humanity. And there are also convinced that the Egyptian society, which is always the mother of Arab societies where to start political and intellectual movements, and occupies the leadership of the developments mentioned site. The political developments in this country and other countries indicate that the US state is not only facing the road is a temple of understanding and dealing with the revolutionary currents in the region of the Islamic, but they are essentially forced to rely on the former regime elements and conservative of them, and if not, it will have to build hopes and programs on ethics and visions and the mentality of the ruling political regimes cultural, political Kagaym liberal, and American culture industry, and the faces of the new secular middle-class, international institutions and existing, and create coalitions between countries in the region and the province Omthalha.hzh truth if made clear more than is evident now Vschir to an important reality and is that compared with the new intellectual and political developments in a wide area of ​​the Middle East and North Africa, the US policy, which has become one of the last and this state on the level of civilization and historical longer state and outdated system. Even though we did not want to accept this conclusion, the more detailed analytical level there is general agreement, and through all the new political developments in Islamic countries (and Christianity) can touch the US weakness in the planning of the area, which led to the demise of sustainable dominate them.

Is this weakness in the US hegemony in the region is the outcome of a mission to Jerianat in the Middle East? And Will contrast to the significant results on the regional level? Will will lead to fundamental changes in the security concepts and particularly in the mutual relationship between Iran and America? Answer these questions would be yes.

But in the first instance and for the purpose of a deeper understanding of new developments, this article is to provide a philosophical definition and inherent to the concept of peace, and for this distinction between the concept of peace and order, or stability (resulting from the dominance) stability, and shows that the American goal of stabilizing the situation in the region and its stability not only because there was not him, but he was working deduced from this concept. And then explains that Iran and Belhaz historical and cultural potential is much closer to the High meaning of the ladder. Find assumed that basically were not new developments in the Middle East reaction to injustice, poverty and inequality; it was a reaction to the contempt that these revolutions main content is not freedom and independence and the political and social rights only; it was before all this Demand Dignity (of the most important concepts in political philosophy Platonism) Calendar peace is the dignity of the products, and the most important is missing in the US foreign policy toward the Islamic region loop, and perhaps the most important element is missing from the US global dominance in the twentieth century.

In this current Valmqal contain philosophical vision and a study on the weakness of the US role in the Middle East, and on the contrary note upgrade Iranian capabilities in this regard, and this article also seeks to release the difference basically between stability or consistency and the concept inherent to him, and explains in the same time, America's quest for permanent access for the first rank, while Iran has the highest potential of cultural and historical meaning inherent to install peace in the Islamic region. At the end of the matter and on the basis of this article is referring to a different security atmosphere can change the status of countries and communities in the region.

• 1 stability on the basis of dominance: existing reality

We use the theory of (hegemonic stability) in wide limits of Almany.az this theory have been associated in the science of international relations, which contains topics in the field of political administration of international economic topics for the US the world in the field of international relations Rabert Claibn (1954). It is called perspective (hegemonic stability ) on the situation in the global system where the imposition of rules and powerful, universal systems by the state of excellence in different areas to maintain the stability of the existing order and balance to force other countries to follow those rules Glipin, 1987. This definition seems simple and useful; but it is this definition which is characterized by these two qualities emerge question is simple and explicit; but all the simple question has a standalone potential to be a key question and pivotal, why the stability of American hegemony and compared with the first years of the ninetieth century past seems weaker overall? In particular, why this great country's foreign policy on Iran's goals have not been achieved ?, and it is not at the required level?

The US relationship story - the new Iranian had begun with the end of the Cold War. The US command began this stage in the year 1991, with mass attacks against Iraq as part of the process of liberation of Kuwait. This process, and has also been shown at a later time, the introduction of US interventions broadly in the province later caused the most important challenges for the site and widely America in the global system. The United States sought and through strategic plans and regional programs as a plan Greater Middle East, and formats directed under the security umbrella of NATO, and through the influence and guidance of the treaties regional organization, the Arab Gulf states and others, to install the appropriate atmosphere in the Middle East and Gulf. But there is an important question arises, if any superpower to what extent can convince the consciences of the political elite and the middle classes and the general public Bmoizinha and its own standards through a series of unilateral actions such as threats and enticement and Alttmaa and warning?

Even if we assume that the US policies in the Middle East led to the stability of the region and the conditions of their order, you can say that stability and peace arrangement is appointed? Can the United States as a superpower that simplify global peace not only on the state level, but on a more accurate level and is not the level of peoples and this simplifies the true sense of peace? We will be in a better position to answer this question if it deepened our understanding of the concept of peace.

No dispute that the ancient philosophers and put a deep understanding of the concept of peace, and this concept is closely associated with emotions and thought Alansan.asalm in Nizarhm concept linked to the meeting and assembly, and is the transition from conflict to remain calm and contentment. We base here to St. Agustin as a source for our understanding of the theoretical Asalm.icol cents Agustin: peace is the ultimate goal of man and all creatures, and all creatures and the impact of the instinct of life seeking to Asalm.uhedv whole communities is peace. Peace and harmony in human societies and people deal in regular relationship among them. And peace is a positive relationship ( positive ) that any positive consensus between two or more neighbors or to coexist peacefully. If peace can only be achieved through two or more partners ... Peace is not just the absence of war or maintaining international relations by acts of human rights laws and the implementation of judicial rulings, but the terms of the peace agreement and cooperation between the parties) (Pazarkad 1382) and in support of the theory of HH social peace as a goal, quotes Goethe: that peace is the highest of all the peaks) can be compared to this definition of peace with the definition and talk to him which indicates that peace is the absence of war and there is no need for consensus and affirmative action. In other words, for peace in the contemporary global custom concept of negative and not positive.

All in all we can say: Peace in the use of modern linked senses sinful.

• 2 Is peace is the absence of war?

It is clear that if there is no war can be violent, and violence in the cases of the absence of war can be a politically violent psychologically or emotionally, economically or. If the state of peace offered as the absence of war can justify all cases of severe and hidden, including violence; because that appears from this definition that peace is not to show only the violence, while, that the failure to show the violence does not mean that his presence and state of no-war The form can be combined and full of extreme violence and organized but more subtle.

And the absence of war could simply be part of the war, sections, and that the case is before or after the war. The war is not the case and aggressive work. Tambs Habz say that war is a way of thinking, a position which can be special operations clearly did not fall. It contains the absence of war, a few or many, and by force or already inside the elements of violence. And see a lot of philosophers that peace is not the absence of war; either modern outlook, says: that peace is not only the state of stability; it refers to the case further.

• 3 Is peace is the order (stability)?

Clearly, the state rankings in international relations is different from the case of the order in the home, office or place of work, identification of order or stability in international relations is the rules imposed on societies in over me and through the power relations and from abroad or within societies impose on humanitarian groups . He also leads the idea of ​​organizing communities and arrange some kind of misuse of the meaning of peace. In fact, the arrangement can contain dimensions repressive Also, why? Because the tracks that create the ground for prosperity and human rights groups are varied composition and non-neutral and disobedience of the order and the violation and the reaction and the love of diversity. The arrangement means sheer inertia, and in this case because of the difficult relations and persistent difficult process free formulation of opinions by people or countries covered by this order and stability, and consequently actions be imposed and is not free. The idea of ​​stability, even if were not rooted in the mind, they are no more than an old truth and obsolete; because of the loss of internal mobility and humanitarian goals, and longer than that because of its dependence on the strongest relationship Balodaf, and remain necessarily short-lived and prone to vandalism in the new shifts.

In the understanding that: that peace is the order be interactions and transactions in a quiet and orderly; but where violence remains a hidden factor and internally. It remains the tendency in such cases on the one hand to form the transactions based on pure reason and on the other hand causes the loss of motivation and hope when General Alansan.khalh can say that the idea of ​​peace such as the absence of war and peace and stability of stability, is only the hidden violence and the use of force, both at the domestic level he or external international and can go even further than this by saying that peace such as the absence of war and peace Castaqrar and arrangement as well as it is not a ladder, but is primarily a result of wars, because of the telescope (Raymond Aron (war is a community reaction caused by the will of the regular communities politically in order to triumph one over another (aron, on war, 12). moves the victor in the war after his victory towards consolidating its rules required; for this Clauzios called famously: the victor loves peace); the sense of order) Aaron, memoranda 242). Therefore inclination not to Warring and create consistency, stability and order in the mile is victorious in the war.

• 4 classic meaning of the ladder

If peace is not the lack of war, stability and order in what is it then? In the definition of peace Alajustina expand to visualize peace, Peace is calm him that emerges from the inside, whether at the individual level or at the level of human groupings (Sdria and Parsa, 84.141) and understand this meaning at the individual level first. Haiedkr says in an article under the title (construction, asylum, thinking) what content: not build a bridge or a building or road is what brings us to remain calm and refers to our existence, but exchange the construction process itself is what brings us calm and prove our existence. Work dopey and automatic and normal is what brings us calm in the end, peace is a necessary business at the moment there are relevant and Alans between us and the world around us as a result of (local surroundings), and got rid of their unity and reclusion and there us tranquility and the corresponding point and Anti her, and is meditation or reflection abstract mental topics.

Man jumps in the case of meditation from the present time any place which is present in it now engaging Balautobaa to come out of the concrete circumstances that surround it; Vlhma meditation or preoccupation with endoscopically concept based on the abstract reasoning is a corresponding point and the presence of anti-useful at the present time. The concept of peace and rational theorizing onion is not linked; it is a collective concept is obtained from individuals and calm Squinthm (in their individual or collective), which is primarily the result of reconciliation with the person himself. If the collective version of this definition is that the peace at the level of the result of a comprehensive reconciliation and consensus among humanitarian groups that came to calm the individual and tranquility in the past communities.

Perhaps Mentskjo refers to this meaning when he says that the real peace is in satisfaction and consistency. As a result, that peace is the flow emerges from the inside, whether inside an individual or a community, while the arrangement and flow stability is imposed from outside. The peace tree sprouting from the foundation of society and depth, and is reflected in the daily events and spontaneous and informal. At a time in which we find arrangement unites the components, we find peace generates multiply (the same 147) if not the establishment of peace and order in the adoption of stability, it is a practical form of stability and maturity, and his appearance. It is located in the anti-peace point of central planning, and government programming, and the will of the arrangement and the will of the control and guidance.

Peace and tranquility is known in cases of irregularity and passion inflamed and non-report and warm relations, most of what is known in the cases, respectively. The writer can be considered a model for this case, he has inwardly and Thapa and unstable, but at the same time has the satisfaction and tranquility Khash.uandma speaks see joy comfortable while there are storm inside of them inspired by the motivation to create his artistic work.

We conclude from this statement that peace is linked to the concept of collective passion and automatic tendency to delight and free motivation and inclination of the vast non-political activities, and these activities constitute the identity of the true peace.

Shown here is necessary for the type of discrimination, Valtrtib or stability first: refer to Alqohanizh, and secondly: the two individual identity (a single individual or a single country or a single community) and Third: Looking for ensuring the acquisition of the dominant of pleasure or pleasurable results obtained from victory. Stationed in the center of the subject of the organization will enjoy the advantages of ownership; but peace Looking for creating an area of ​​longing and satisfaction and comfort. The concept of pleasure instinctively and animal while Pleasing and cheerful and is subject to the concept of integration. Integrated and mental are alone be able to live up to the level of pleasure and joy is integrated mental remain in the level of Allzh.ohnak also the thrill of delight in the pleasure and satisfaction but not component, Alouhad.oakmen outside dimension of pleasure in the joy, when the man is unable to crystallize what the innermost of the need and the will of the farthest from the instinctive needs.

Again emphasize that the arrangement is a process that is aggregated from abroad, while the peace fact wide and gradually emerges from the depth of the community (unlike the order and stability, which is a limited operation produces planning and mental programming) .walachtlav between peace and the order is the same difference between the will to life and the will to impose authority on life. And the will to life is the will of innate, and this had been wronged by the philosophers Alhaddathwaian. Not postponed this will manifested in peace and reflected in the daily relationships and simple phenomena, today to tomorrow, it does not comply with the complex Balaklaat and do not move between the mentalities, not looking for a finding arrangement for the purpose of driving the dimensions of life, but are looking for a cheerful and automatic passion for life. and in this direction had to say (harder): I am not here (in life) for the purpose of thinking, but for the purpose of attendance and sense and life.

And take away the violent logic of the arrangement or the logic of consistency and stability everything from everyone and gives them stead is the thrill of the possession of the person sought victor stability, in contrast, gives the logic of peace and everything to everyone. Meaning is emanating from this speech is that at the time the order is the task of unification, the peace and the creation of pluralism; because what governs in the ranking is the individual will (per capita or per state) while peace is the result of extensive historical interactions between people among them.And peace in the foundation is a mental polished human individuals that take place in various aspects of human life; but will, based on preference and power and oppression are looking for a character this pluralistic liberal is based on the free will of the members of the community through the impenetrable (himself), if the penetration is the exterior and CEO of the will of domination and possession, or for transportation: It's the implementation of the will of domination or provided to him and start to breach the peace process. It may be the basic gist of authentic peace approach, is Tdadeh with the concept of intentional intrusion or planning to penetrate from the outside.

5. peace in exchange for influence

What distinguishes the peace that does not impose nor planned from the outside; it emerges from the inside. One of the differences (figure) communities and nations, not states and politicians. When searching a State for stability (peace) intelligently and want to sit security trends on the basis of peace, imperative that they avoid to two areas nationalists: the monopoly of resources (physical) and the will to dominate and control, and the most important and most complex of them, rooting (institutionalization) stems deal from within communities System region, nor take from development and calm the target of state, but to the region lies .. and this policy is not ethical and correct, but are useful and reasonable.

The influence is not only a policy not to influence and, on the contrary, the policy influence, often devolves to the lack of influence in the end. As the influence except as cultural and psychological roots, is not influential, and perhaps we can call it a fact that the influential intervention superficial and temporary. Moreover, the multiplicity of power and comprehensiveness, the region is more humane, and fruit, and rational, of unilateral influence by a superpower or a powerful country in the region. This policy will lead to a balanced and comprehensive development, making it a space deal which is reinforced concerns of development and progress among them, but in policy influence unilateral (the dominance of a state and a society on the other countries, societies), the development of the highly complex and cost; they are not extensive and comprehensive, though unilateral influence not only be a powerful one-sided, he lacks self-development and proliferation.

If we want to characterize the lack of influence of unilateral, we found in the lack of comprehensiveness, in the sense that he lacks self-growth and proliferation, but is deduced from it, as the country that have evolved over the unilateral influence virtually deprive others of this development. Moreover, this evolution is often faced security threats, do not undermine security fully and undermine its success depends on the threats (non-security) and this does not result in safer, and undermine the threats is not secure. Even though we have made every effort to undermine the threats; however, we will not produce safety.

The reason for the lack of success of the unilateral influence in breadth and inclusiveness, is that the influence and expansion of the moral and ideological, realism and field standards, terms of cultures and communities, not states. Moreover, the influence and expansion, facts Mottagabeltan. The influence that penetrates the culture and then expand to include the State and political issues, and starts from the states to reach the culture and society. Then that influence should not be aimed at the expansion of power, but to the expansion of freedom, which means the expansion of the creative work and the freedom of creative spaces.

6. peace, and Almottagabl influence

Peace formed through Almottagabl influence (not mono) and social (not political) and spontaneous (and not in an organized and Central) is a concept Allanmozja which intersects the concept of influence in the cosmic theory. And thus become the opposite and wide effects moving towards the concept of holistic and year beyond the concept of influence even though it was broad and equitable impact, namely to ensure the right Almottagabl influence, and free, and wide for all nations; and this is what we call the (peace), in other words, that this effect, based on the emergence of Culture and regional concepts, hence the just and comprehensive concept and spontaneously influence is not called a breakthrough (influence), but it is freedom, and births creative, anti-hegemony, and independence, and the search for obsessed with stability and blissful life, in other words, is the process of a simple life in the region.

However, the peace does not mean equality among nations in the life of the region.The effect if multiple and intertwined, and associated with the society, culture and a cause him away from the domination, by its nature can not be (equal) among nations in the level of influence and quantity, but it will be in a circle (justice) .owalsbb in it, that the willingness of social groups and communities humanity in their ability to be creative, production, and development in various areas of life is not one level, and here was a case of unequal trading nations (peoples) region. However, the loss of this equality does not mean the loss of justice, as the inequality of justice closer to equality.

The challenge for the region in front of the United States is not the mismatch between this country and the Middle East in terms of capacity and wealth; and it is the will of domination and lack of interest in the freedom of the United States; or use a control mechanism and guidance to prevent the emission of freedoms in these communities, and this is injustice (injustice) and may mean justice in the orientation of a great country, that the UN give independence and freedom to choose happiness as you understand Nations and be (superpower) associated with this choice and support him, then turn the dominance of the superpower to the leadership with ethics in dealing with the issues of the region or the world . The Islamic Republic is far from the desired phase, but the United States is much farther from it. If the distance between the United States and the dream of peace in the Middle East is like a distance of war for peace.

7. the presence of the United States in the Middle East, between peace and stability:

It is clear that the United States has not be successful in the full application of the Aristotelian notion that says, is not enough to win the war and take control, but the most important is that Tnzmoa peace. But it seems that politics has reached a philosophy that does not get peace efforts on the one hand and lasts through the central superpower nor is it related to the concepts of physical and social interests of the segments and countries efforts.

The application of the traditional ladder or the Middle East to the United States and plans policy in the region model is not difficult. It is clear that the United States is still seeking unlike the new definition of peace to the stability and consistency created in the region in order to influence the sustainability; to ensure the interests and benefits of the special.

And limited efforts to stabilize the Stability and systems on the (I) without the participation of others, and these (I) do not dominate and bully only after weakening of others and even degrading them, in the sense that they accept weakness and self-get it; from here, we can say that the mentality of the United States in foreign policy Middle East and other regions (mainly) can not achieve Mamdouhh and welcome goals.

We emphasize once again that the systems and consistency, which aims to power, is opposed to peace, and Altkther, creativity and independence of individuals. In fact, the will of the United States to stabilize the model of systems, is an attempt to free state blackout freedom. The United States, which has enjoyed in its history, peace, pluralism, and freedom, and the emergence of innovations in domestic policy, foreign policy found in the tread otherwise.

From the above we can say that the United States and democratic freedoms state are against peace, freedom, and this leads us to the question: Is the imposition external pressure imposed by the State of liberal democracy Azmy- the UN (peoples) Other, is a prerequisite for achieving inner freedom in this country ?

Hint (John Locke) several years ago on this question in the affirmative (Richard Rorty) answer was answered, about Britain's domination of India, and later confirmed. It was believed that strong democracies (often meant the United States), facing Tzahama between the sustainability of the institutions and norms of internal democracy, and fair dealing with third world countries.

We can not separate the say on this subject in our article this but suffice to this conclusion: that democracy assets in American politics and Western countries, does not enable them to apply the schemes actually seeking to peace in foreign policy; because the investment democratic tools in the mother country, requires the exploitation of the tools is Democracy (supporting dictatorships, and weaken independent political elites, and support differences and discrimination, economic exploitation and ...) in third world countries. This conclusion even if it did not believe the theory is applicable in practice.

Shows that the United States is forced to work in a non-democratic in the Middle East, and except it will face its institutions, and interests, and values ​​of serious internal crisis. When politicians talk Americans strictly limit and their interests outside the United States, it is evident that there is a close relationship between the foreign interests of the Western superpower and civilian programs and democracy within that State. But unlike the United States which are forced to work, reverse the policies of internal democracy, the mentality of domination and control is not the mentality of democracy, in its foreign policy, especially in the Middle District East and nearby areas to Iran, but it is incumbent upon Iran to adhere to democracy in its foreign policy towards the region and other surrounding areas. What does it mean if this difference? And how Iran can comply with democracy in its foreign policy in the areas near them?

Passed by us previously, peace, asymptotic freedom of Nations (spontaneous people's life and social strata). And freedom from part approach to the need for democracy and equal nations. In fact, there is little logical distance between peace and freedom, and the freedom and democracy in the sense of social justice. And a further statement, peace in the public meaning, includes the freedom of nations and democracy or justice. This equation includes domestic politics as well. He thought (Carl Ashmit) that the basis of European democracy is that even the princes and the parish.

The traditional peace in international relations theory, the basis and what they are committed to democracy. And can be defined Nations (people) democracy in foreign and international relations policy, regardless of the level of wealth and capabilities and influence, by virtue of being involved in the humanitarian, they all enjoyed one level in the right to determine its destiny and future, and the future of the region, and how social dealings (collective). This simple and profound Great United States did not pay him the importance of the original, but Iran's Islamic revolution, it must respect the origin of democracy in its regional policies, and this observation needs to detail.

8.aaran, the state is ready to traditional theory of peace

Many researchers believe that Iran in the past and its history was a democratic entity in the region near them and the world, where the Iranians and Iranian culture in handling cultural and trading and economic continuous with the nationalities and the surrounding areas, and rarely find the position indicates the will of the seizure of political domination by Iran. As a possibility and at the theoretical level, we can say that the Iranian culture and psyche are almost moral philosophy, inspire freedom and independence in dealing with other nations. And we are talking here about the high willingness to Iran to advance spontaneous moral life in the region, this is the definitive treatment of peace or war. Perhaps this is the meaning indicated by (Hobbs) when he said: We must look for the treatment of war in the philosophy of morality (Strauss 0.365) There is no doubt that he was referring to the philosophy of morality falls in the culture of a particular society (Hobbs model is in English), a spokesman for the community and not the general teachings of religion.

If this is true, Vnstantg that none of the Iranian governments use central schemes, and political orientation, and biased to the unilateral influence, has overturned the cultural originally enshrined in the Iranian society, namely the publication of a free and independent life at the level of the region's communities, in short, if you wanted to be a nation-state In foreign policy, they have contradicted its history and presence. There is no doubt that it is incumbent on the state of Iran to abide by the policies of peace or traditional peace strategy, and indeed Islamic Republic of Iran has committed to this policy at the State level thesis is striking. In fact, the concepts of respect for justice among nations, and love the good of all, and to comply with that development, and perfect, and everything in foreign policy and international relations, is not a national concepts, but regional, these concepts are rooted in the legacy of the founder of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini (RA).

These concepts are all we have mentioned to demonstrate a single peace, found in the letters of Imam Khomeini (RA) has been mentioned in the tail of the Islamic brotherhood among nations. Considering the founder of the Islamic Republic, that all values ​​in the relationship with the nations surrounding Iran, reflected in the title of the brothers. According to the opinion of Imam Khomeini (RA), the people and the State of the Islamic Republic ... by virtue of the Koran dealing with all the Islamic and non-Islamic countries brotherhood faith. "Imam believed that: All the Mamluks Islamic treat them as ourselves" and "we find ourselves always partners in the future ( Muslims). " (Imam Khomeini, the newspaper light .115) and brotherhood means a high degree of proximity and large undertakings, without feeling Balastala. The researcher believes after reading all the words of the Imam (RA) on international relations and foreign policy carefully, that there is no indication of the categories where arrogance Iranian nationalism (as a political entity has priority and superiority in front of others) in his words and speeches (RA). We emphasize that the follow-up to national goals, those that fall under the government's national specimen, is not opposed to thinking of Imam (RA), which he used to say: that Islam does not fit with (nationalism only), but the follow-up of national goals is to fight to the history of Iranian culture and its authority in the region.

The difference between the Iranian foreign policy towards countries neighboring and foreign policy of the United States in the region, the difference between peace and stability (or systems), or between freedom and control, or between spontaneous self and external imposition, and the multiplicity of creative and violence hidden, and between belief and social dynamism of the bottom to the top and the belief political dynamic from top to bottom, and finally the dynamic between life and teleological rationality. What does this mean for the last difference? Iran through its foreign policy seeks to revive the culture of pre-modern (ancient culture), this last pre-modern in the region, may not have been a golden stage, but it was carries a higher proportion of free relations, and creations Nations and independence.

It seems that Iran is ultimately looking for a renewal of life itself and re-old culture itself (pre-modern) in the region, that stage that Iran was moving without penetrate and dominate. Iran has been in the historical stage pre-modern cultural reference, social, scientific, rather than a dominant political force, and this cultural reference and not to dominate the political and military dominance could Iranian society to underscore creations installed in the history of Islam and Muslim societies.

9. New Security Notice

At first, it may feel based on the perception that provide content for the liberation of Iran's history and culture, said that the recent political developments, community and intellectual communities in the Middle East are in solidarity with the historical life of the individual and society in the Islamic Iranian territorial beyond. If this Vtad the latest developments in the Arab Spring is in some ways a continuation of the impact of the Iranian culture and psyche in surroundings where Alakulaima.omen us this great claim? Why promise of political awakening in the region this expanding experience of Iranian origin experience and we believe that the political awakening of the Iranian revolution began? Each event results from Snkha.

The Industrial Revolution or the information revolution as a model, usually generate the results of its kind and purely political revolution carried to the results of Noaha.ao Persian proverb says (quoted in Sheikh Bahai): wheat sprout wheat and barley Saira.icol Haiedkr every idea can only change the idea of ​​Snkha. If we assume that the revolutions in the communication of information or any other field of industrial and techniques, does not lead directly without mode to psychological and mental developments and radical changes in beliefs, but her roles Kaltsria and the facility and the formation and structuring Aharkat.olas difficult to accept that Vigilance idea can only produce vigilance, they experience exclusively political revolution in full, is capable of causing the outcome of its kind and that affected the other hand, the results of the new revolutions. If recent political awakening study takes its true meaning only when the relationship with another stimulating political revolution and the Iranian revolution and start from there, and the other transitions regardless of the extent of their universality and global impact, and they clearly do not cause the creation of Aliqzat.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]