Home
Legal representative: Federal Court gave Parliament the right to submit projectsMohsen al-Sadoun
4/14/2015
Tomorrow Press / Baghdad: Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Legal Committee Mohsen al-Sadoun, on Tuesday, the Federal Court decided to give the right of the House of Representatives to make proposals for legislation of laws, adding that there are some proposals for legislation of laws can not be provided by the House of Representatives. Sadoun said for "tomorrow Press", "The Federal Court has decided to give the right of the House of Representatives to provide law proposals for legislation, with the exception of three varieties," adding that "the three exceptions are the laws that relate to financial matters and the laws relating to legislation judiciary and draft laws that are inconsistent with the government program voted by the House of Representatives. "
He pointed out that "the earlier decision of the Federal Court was unfair and contrary to include error of Article 69 of the Constitution, which provided for sending legislation laws of the Council of Ministers and the President's proposals and laws of the head of the parliamentary committee or 10 deputies."
He explained that "the Federal Court the highest authority in the country, but they may not cancel the materials in the Constitution, which may explain the constitutional articles."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
4/14/2015
Tomorrow Press / Baghdad: Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Legal Committee Mohsen al-Sadoun, on Tuesday, the Federal Court decided to give the right of the House of Representatives to make proposals for legislation of laws, adding that there are some proposals for legislation of laws can not be provided by the House of Representatives. Sadoun said for "tomorrow Press", "The Federal Court has decided to give the right of the House of Representatives to provide law proposals for legislation, with the exception of three varieties," adding that "the three exceptions are the laws that relate to financial matters and the laws relating to legislation judiciary and draft laws that are inconsistent with the government program voted by the House of Representatives. "
He pointed out that "the earlier decision of the Federal Court was unfair and contrary to include error of Article 69 of the Constitution, which provided for sending legislation laws of the Council of Ministers and the President's proposals and laws of the head of the parliamentary committee or 10 deputies."
He explained that "the Federal Court the highest authority in the country, but they may not cancel the materials in the Constitution, which may explain the constitutional articles."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
