Islamic State seizes Ramadi A bitter defeat
06:32 AM
IMO Abadi must protect the Anbar region at all costs or he will never stop the Sectarian violence Islamic State seizes Ramadi A bitter defeat The Baghdad government’s hopes of driving back the caliphate in Iraq's largest province suffer a heavy blow May 16th 2015
20150523_blp903.jpg
THE DAY before Islamic State (IS) swept Ramadi, the largest city in western Iraq and the capital of Iraq’s biggest province of Anbar, the head of the province’s 13 Sunni tribes warned that its loss was a foregone conclusion. From his seat of exile across the border in Jordan, Tarik Alabdullah al-Halbusi protested that the government had broken its promises. It had reneged on earlier commitments to arm and integrate Anbar’s Sunni tribesmen into Iraq’s Shia-dominated security forces and turned to its allied Shia militias to fight IS instead. This was a huge mistake. Fearful of being overrun and expelled by the Iran-backed militias, his Sunni tribesmen have been turning in droves to IS. “They give jobs to the unemployed and pay salaries on time,” Mr Halbusi said.
The loss of Ramadi on May 15th is a serious blow to the government in Baghdad. After the fall of Tikrit, a provincial capital north-east of Baghdad, in March, the hope had been to drive IS out of Anbar province before turning north. IS has long controlled much of Anbar, but its main city, Ramadi, was mostly in government hands, though subject to IS incursions. That bastion has now mostly gone, though fighting continues.
IS is now threatening Baiji, Iraq’s largest oil refinery. In Syria, it is menacing the southern suburbs of Damascus and is moving into the outskirts of the archaeological treasure of Palmyra, Syria’s ancient Roman-era capital. Despite the efforts of an American-led multinational coalition, IS controls not only most of Iraq’s Syrian border, but its Jordanian and much of its Saudi border too. Last month it detonated three suicide truck and car-bombs at Tureibil, Iraq’s last government-held border crossing to Jordan.
IS’s gains have often been the product of the mistakes of the region’s governments. IS’s advances across Iraq and Syria have been due not just to its force of arms and a terrifying reputation for violence, but also to the lack of a political process in either country.
A month ago Mr Halbusi went to Baghdad to negotiate a new pact between the government and the tribesmen of Anbar. His model was the Sunni Awakening he had devised nine years earlier with General John Allen, then the deputy commander of America’s marines in Anbar, to rid the province of al-Qaeda. (General Allen is now President Barack Obama’s envoy to the coalition against IS.) Within eight months, tens of thousands of tribesmen recruited, armed and paid for by America had regained control of the province for the coalition, with few battles fought. Most militants simply switched sides. “We want to use the same concept again,” says Mr Halbusi.
Haider Abadi, the Iraqi prime minister (and a Shia), agreed in principle, speaking of the need for Sunni participation and integration in the “popular mobilisation” against IS. But a few days later on a visit to Habbaniya, Britain’s old military base in Anbar, Mr Abadi issued the Sunnis only a few old guns. Flush from their victory over IS in Tikrit, Saddam Hussein’s hometown and powerbase, Mr Abadi agreed to give the Shia militias a second whack at Anbar. “The government wants to destroy the dignity of the Sunnis,” says Mr Halbusi.
The problem is that Iraq’s Shia-dominated authorities fear that any weapons they issue to the Sunni tribesmen may find their way to IS and be turned on them. Rebuffed by the government, the tribes turned to Western powers, hopeful that they might arm them directly much as they do the Iraqi Kurds. They got some verbal support in America’s Congress, but received nothing on the ground, though the Americans are now operating a training camp in Anbar. His tribesmen, says Mr Halbusi, feel betrayed.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
06:32 AM
IMO Abadi must protect the Anbar region at all costs or he will never stop the Sectarian violence Islamic State seizes Ramadi A bitter defeat The Baghdad government’s hopes of driving back the caliphate in Iraq's largest province suffer a heavy blow May 16th 2015
20150523_blp903.jpg
THE DAY before Islamic State (IS) swept Ramadi, the largest city in western Iraq and the capital of Iraq’s biggest province of Anbar, the head of the province’s 13 Sunni tribes warned that its loss was a foregone conclusion. From his seat of exile across the border in Jordan, Tarik Alabdullah al-Halbusi protested that the government had broken its promises. It had reneged on earlier commitments to arm and integrate Anbar’s Sunni tribesmen into Iraq’s Shia-dominated security forces and turned to its allied Shia militias to fight IS instead. This was a huge mistake. Fearful of being overrun and expelled by the Iran-backed militias, his Sunni tribesmen have been turning in droves to IS. “They give jobs to the unemployed and pay salaries on time,” Mr Halbusi said.
The loss of Ramadi on May 15th is a serious blow to the government in Baghdad. After the fall of Tikrit, a provincial capital north-east of Baghdad, in March, the hope had been to drive IS out of Anbar province before turning north. IS has long controlled much of Anbar, but its main city, Ramadi, was mostly in government hands, though subject to IS incursions. That bastion has now mostly gone, though fighting continues.
IS is now threatening Baiji, Iraq’s largest oil refinery. In Syria, it is menacing the southern suburbs of Damascus and is moving into the outskirts of the archaeological treasure of Palmyra, Syria’s ancient Roman-era capital. Despite the efforts of an American-led multinational coalition, IS controls not only most of Iraq’s Syrian border, but its Jordanian and much of its Saudi border too. Last month it detonated three suicide truck and car-bombs at Tureibil, Iraq’s last government-held border crossing to Jordan.
IS’s gains have often been the product of the mistakes of the region’s governments. IS’s advances across Iraq and Syria have been due not just to its force of arms and a terrifying reputation for violence, but also to the lack of a political process in either country.
A month ago Mr Halbusi went to Baghdad to negotiate a new pact between the government and the tribesmen of Anbar. His model was the Sunni Awakening he had devised nine years earlier with General John Allen, then the deputy commander of America’s marines in Anbar, to rid the province of al-Qaeda. (General Allen is now President Barack Obama’s envoy to the coalition against IS.) Within eight months, tens of thousands of tribesmen recruited, armed and paid for by America had regained control of the province for the coalition, with few battles fought. Most militants simply switched sides. “We want to use the same concept again,” says Mr Halbusi.
Haider Abadi, the Iraqi prime minister (and a Shia), agreed in principle, speaking of the need for Sunni participation and integration in the “popular mobilisation” against IS. But a few days later on a visit to Habbaniya, Britain’s old military base in Anbar, Mr Abadi issued the Sunnis only a few old guns. Flush from their victory over IS in Tikrit, Saddam Hussein’s hometown and powerbase, Mr Abadi agreed to give the Shia militias a second whack at Anbar. “The government wants to destroy the dignity of the Sunnis,” says Mr Halbusi.
The problem is that Iraq’s Shia-dominated authorities fear that any weapons they issue to the Sunni tribesmen may find their way to IS and be turned on them. Rebuffed by the government, the tribes turned to Western powers, hopeful that they might arm them directly much as they do the Iraqi Kurds. They got some verbal support in America’s Congress, but received nothing on the ground, though the Americans are now operating a training camp in Anbar. His tribesmen, says Mr Halbusi, feel betrayed.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]