Home
Deputy: the budget law can not be a violation of the court and stabbed him unacceptable
10/7/2015 7:09
[Baghdad
the Kurdistan Alliance MP Arafat Karam, said that "the appeal of the Federal Court budget is unacceptable."
And between Karam she told all of Iraq [where], "The budget that was voted on the law can not interfere in it by the House of Representatives or any other entity because it is ready only for implementation by the government."
He added that "the budget before the vote can be based Council House of Representatives by a reduction in the side of the aspects or transfers, so it after the vote on the budget could not be any party to interfere, even the House of Representatives, unless the intervention in the budget that came from his share, so this is not possible because it was voted on bringing Quaona steady and stable " .
generosity and pointed out that "set aside the Federal Court to amend the budget is unacceptable because the transfers and cuts leading up to the vote, and after the vote the budget became law can not be a violation and interference in its drafting,
he is staying and the budget remains and sent to the government for implementation only, and any change can not be accepted."
He said "The House of Representatives is the voice of the people, nor can anyone but the elected denounce the voice of the people."
The Federal Supreme Court has declared Monday the unconstitutionality of a number of financial budget for law materials in 2015 as "the House of Representatives has Pthariaha without returning to the government to take its approval or return the project to them for the purpose of considering the proposals,
indicating that the decision of the Court of Cassation stressed that the preparation of the budget is the prerogative of the Council of Ministers, and in accordance with the principle of the separation of powers provided for in Article 47 of the Constitution. "
The appeals court included prevent the right of Parliament to conduct transfers in doors exchange budget and determine the central bank sales in its daily auction for $ 75 million, with preventing allocations to the popular crowd and the introduction of grades for the purpose of contractors to install the permanent staffing, and other materials.
parliamentary Finance Committee promised the Federal Court decision as "a confiscation constitutional right of Parliament and launch hands of the government in the establishment of a new situation makes the Parliament before the rejection option or acceptance of the Law of the next budget
and what this from the repercussions of the political and social situation as it [the court] flouted all meetings of the Committee and the reforms set by the budget to reduce unnecessary expenditures. "
As said member Committee Magda Tamimi that "the Commission did not violate the Constitution by amending the budget," noting that the committee "The government will call for a review of an appeal of the Federal Court."
For his part, the legal expert Tareq war on constitutional appeals issued by the Federal Court in some of the financial budget items for 2015
and said war For [where], that "Parliament amendments were not unconstitutional or incident in all the judgments which put it in the budget law has been canceled by the Federal Court as long as the government has not supplied", adding that "the Iraqi constitution gave the Law of the budget as a particular,
we note that and all the laws passed by Parliament to be included in the paragraph in the article of the Constitution, while the budget law allocated two articles in which the Constitution, and we note the importance of balancing the great impact "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
10/7/2015 7:09
[Baghdad
the Kurdistan Alliance MP Arafat Karam, said that "the appeal of the Federal Court budget is unacceptable."
And between Karam she told all of Iraq [where], "The budget that was voted on the law can not interfere in it by the House of Representatives or any other entity because it is ready only for implementation by the government."
He added that "the budget before the vote can be based Council House of Representatives by a reduction in the side of the aspects or transfers, so it after the vote on the budget could not be any party to interfere, even the House of Representatives, unless the intervention in the budget that came from his share, so this is not possible because it was voted on bringing Quaona steady and stable " .
generosity and pointed out that "set aside the Federal Court to amend the budget is unacceptable because the transfers and cuts leading up to the vote, and after the vote the budget became law can not be a violation and interference in its drafting,
he is staying and the budget remains and sent to the government for implementation only, and any change can not be accepted."
He said "The House of Representatives is the voice of the people, nor can anyone but the elected denounce the voice of the people."
The Federal Supreme Court has declared Monday the unconstitutionality of a number of financial budget for law materials in 2015 as "the House of Representatives has Pthariaha without returning to the government to take its approval or return the project to them for the purpose of considering the proposals,
indicating that the decision of the Court of Cassation stressed that the preparation of the budget is the prerogative of the Council of Ministers, and in accordance with the principle of the separation of powers provided for in Article 47 of the Constitution. "
The appeals court included prevent the right of Parliament to conduct transfers in doors exchange budget and determine the central bank sales in its daily auction for $ 75 million, with preventing allocations to the popular crowd and the introduction of grades for the purpose of contractors to install the permanent staffing, and other materials.
parliamentary Finance Committee promised the Federal Court decision as "a confiscation constitutional right of Parliament and launch hands of the government in the establishment of a new situation makes the Parliament before the rejection option or acceptance of the Law of the next budget
and what this from the repercussions of the political and social situation as it [the court] flouted all meetings of the Committee and the reforms set by the budget to reduce unnecessary expenditures. "
As said member Committee Magda Tamimi that "the Commission did not violate the Constitution by amending the budget," noting that the committee "The government will call for a review of an appeal of the Federal Court."
For his part, the legal expert Tareq war on constitutional appeals issued by the Federal Court in some of the financial budget items for 2015
and said war For [where], that "Parliament amendments were not unconstitutional or incident in all the judgments which put it in the budget law has been canceled by the Federal Court as long as the government has not supplied", adding that "the Iraqi constitution gave the Law of the budget as a particular,
we note that and all the laws passed by Parliament to be included in the paragraph in the article of the Constitution, while the budget law allocated two articles in which the Constitution, and we note the importance of balancing the great impact "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
