Home
Down with Maliki's pain?
Date: Thursday, 06.07.2012 8:29
Facing political and cultural elites and the general public amid the political crisis is unprecedented in the country, historically a question about our experience young democracy, and treated the way Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and outputs, and the type of advice received by that attract him, according to all observers,
To the adoption of the worst choices in dealing with a high level of disagreement between the major political blocs in Iraq.
pain down Maliki really? It is a question we can ask whether the left-Maliki in power or out of them via measures unconstitutional. Did not fallen yet pulled him legitimacy, two blocks of the country and the second force within the National Alliance, as well as many independent figures known history of anti-dictatorship of Saddam Hussein, and the manifestations of corruption and mismanagement in the new Iraqi state today?
pain caused Mr. al-Maliki in the loss of a large part and a basic legitimacy as head of a coalition government, when the claimed ordering the display signatures of Representatives (and regardless of the audit carried out by the blocks in question) on the security services, police and criminal evidence, the institutions are usually displayed the criminals out, not elected representatives who want to exercise their constitutional right?
Did not lose Mr. Maliki, the most important part of its legitimacy, when the claimed thousand style and style, make a climate of threats, intimidation and Theloaha arrest of political parties the major had to collect signatures of no-confidence, after the prime minister himself blocked the doors of dialogue, and refused to negotiate on the implementation of the commitments the historic consensus reached with all partners, and kept ignoring the calls aimed to launch a process of checks and balances, including all facilities lag and falter, which make the country sink into inertia and disability?
pain of losing Mr. Maliki, the most important part of its legitimacy, and loses his balance, to the extent that Mr. Muqtada al-Sadr asks: Why should we that we can achieve only in the allegations of the parties forced the House to sign, why not investigate the facts of the other was where the government threatens House of Representatives that they have signed a request to withdraw confidence?
After everything that happened, do you need the government of Mr. Maliki's new measures to withdraw her confidence, or What happened so far, made it the Ministry of the Demilitarized confidence judgment, especially after the results that emerged from the talks the highest political parties in the country represented by Sadr and the Iraqi List and the Kurdistan Alliance and the parties an independent task, and the objections of large-Maliki issued by the leaders of the Supreme Council and the outskirts of the National Coalition, and after repeated requests from the National Alliance to offer a better alternative is able to defuse the crisis on subsequent believes in dialogue and spare the country the specter of discord and division, and even scenarios partition?
see who persuaded Mr. Maliki not to respond to the calls of the meeting of Arbil, the first on a reaffirmation of commitments which served as a safety valve for the political process, and without which what happened to his second term? And who persuaded Mr. Maliki that he should not engage with the major blocs in the country, and that is, instead, to deal and engage in dialogue with the forces do not believe in democracy, and mobilize demonstrations fabricated here or there, or request the support of views was described is that it does not believe in the political system which aspires the elites and the forces that fought long for the rule of the partnership and remove the effects of tyranny term?
that the practices that deliberately to it the government team and those that looms the possibility that resort to it, and the movement odd for the military, who calls everyone not to Tsaashm, are the things you get for the first time in a democratic system. It seems that the definition of "ruling strong," adopted by Mr. Maliki means the man most able to practice the methods of abuse, threats and militarism, while confirming its partners through the dialogues that took place over the past years, said the ruling in order to be strong, that strengthened the level of understanding of higher possible with partners, and based on the depth of national relations with which the common challenges, in addition to the ability of the representatives of the social components that make a strong resolutions supported these understandings, and can be applied almost smooth and solid, objective, free from singularity and policies of oppression and breaking commitments and causing cracks in the top of the political pyramid.
that the definition of "man strong state ", which is consistent with the constitutional obligations, is what makes the country is indispensable in a crisis of confidence unfortunate that we see today, no one knew the type of challenges that will leave the course of all events. Either way you Astselha Mr. Maliki in the management of the game, and the new rules is common in democratic regimes, and rejected throughout all the stages established for this new Iraq, it is the entrance to the evils threatening the future of the modern state in our country, and put on the tipping point, all our capabilities the other and the destinies of the Malate people did not finds it heal wounds or alleviate their suffering, which affected and Asttalt then exacerbated by the inability to manage wisely the differences in the most critical areas. again, pain down al-Maliki after being left alone, and having proved that he feared the session to withdraw confidence and strain the same maximum stress in order to prevent held.
to ignore the political weight they represent the outskirts of the meetings of Erbil, Najaf, and to pretend that their objections to the way al-Maliki in the state administration, not of an effect on the position of prime minister, and stick to this position in any way, giving back to our memory the worst logic I have known the Middle East, which began to emerge from the darkness of tyranny to try a formula of coexistence and the principle of political pluralism, the guarantor of the stability of the real, which gives the people of the region hope the possibility of catching up with developed countries, after a century Avninah in "conflict primitive power" and we reject the solutions Civil requiring statesmen of high caliber, aware of their historical responsibilities, Abrun and through it a more modern concepts about the devolution of power and the dimensions of the specter of divisions and wars .. Historical positions that can be granted, according to our people hope, after all attempts to sow the dark forces of despair and frustration in the spirit of this nation.
n wrote political editor
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
