Home
Iraq: Maliki is awaiting a decision on us troop presence lithmh to Washington and Tehran
Editor: SS | BR
Monday 18 July, 2011 10: 15 GMT
Spokesman for the Iraqi list book Shaker
Sumerian news/Baghdad
The Iraqi list, confirmed Monday that there were awaiting the decision of the US troops to stay on Maliki lithmh to America or Iran, calling them "unpatriotic", inviting to take a position in favour of people and claim to leave without conditions.
And the Iraqi list spokesman statement book Shaker and Sumerian "received news", "copy of the National President of internship and waiting for the Government will take a decision on the extension of the presence of US troops in Iraq or not", pointing out that "the country's sovereignty and security of the citizen and the future of Iraq."
The book that "the Prime Minister is expected to agree to keep us lithmh to the Americans and that he has joint projects with them, and if US troops would stay, he had been subjected to pressure Iran but cooperate", stating that "no clear position on the existence or the departure of US troops from some strong concern and allow doubt the sincerity of the parties."
And through the book rejected "deal with it in the context of conflicts between the parties to the political process," to take a position in principle decided upon for the benefit of the people and homeland, claiming leave unconditionally and not to remain under any pretext. "
The book was "feared Iranian threats in the u.s. would fill the vacuum, it suffers from a permanent disability is the inability to look to the Iraqi people with vision and conscious and did not see the capabilities of the Iraqi national unity and readiness to defend the country, particularly the Iraqis ' considerable experience in dealing with the occupiers and their agents", wondering "is that the continued presence of US troops will be based on a occupation troops or forces attribution?, if intended to be attribution question would be underpinned against whom?".
The book drew from this altarigat the Iraqi Government that was intended to do is request that US forces will cover all costs for the survival of American forces at the expense of the Iraqi people and the State funds, "he said, adding that" US forces authorization to defend itself will continue killing Iraqi citizens indiscriminately, with the same random methods, which will contribute to the American attribution forces raids and arrests in the so-called fight against terrorism on the basis of what brings detective. "
The spokesman for the Iraqi list, "the US forces would be blatant interference in our internal affairs, and specifically in the policies and positions of the Iraqi Government through its advisers and associates", but "as for us party's claim that there is an urgent need for the survival of sufficient forces to protect its Embassy in Iraq, we react to protect foreign embassies is the duty of the host State, but not the State of the Embassy itself, which confine protection procedures inside the Embassy itself."
A book saying "if we can find from the vacuum feared the withdrawal of US forces, which has leaves to infiltrate the Iranian public, honoured zahwa we respond to them that the alternative to all this is the true national project, which is based on national unity, which is based on the common defence of all our political and our sectors of our lands and address common to build a modern democratic State."
Oscillating Iraqi political remarks on survival of part of the US forces in the country after 2011, between acceptance and rejection or acceptance of the timid, with load some other blocks blocks responsible for decision-making, considering the State of law coalition leader Hassan Al-Sunaid, on 19 June last, the survival or withdrawal of US troops from Iraq was not yet Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, but nevertheless, the Council of Ministers of the political blocs, inviting the latter to take a unified stance towards the subject, State Coalition MP Walid law Ornaments, in the last 25 June, that Iraq needed to keep us forces to protect its airspace and symbolic Kirkuk and other areas subject to the approval of the House.
In contrast, their comrades last June 28, he would reject any decision by Parliament concerning the extension of US forces in Iraq, while the PUK leader, Adnan Mufti US forces should remain in Iraq beyond the end of the year 2011, on the basis that the State of Iraq is still not integrated, and that a large majority of political parties recognize and support the survival of these forces.
The head of the Iraqi House of Osama in 23 June alngivi past, the survival of US forces in Iraq is subject to the agreement of the political blocs, according to a Government request.
And Iraq and the United States, during 2008, the strategic framework agreement to support Iraqi ministries and agencies in the transition from strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic and diplomatic, cultural and security, based on reducing the number of provincial reconstruction teams, as well as providing a sustainable rule of law, including the police development programme and the coordination and supervision and report for the Fund of the Iraq relief and reconstruction.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington at the end of November 2008 must withdraw all u.s. forces from all the lands and waters and airspace of Iraq not later than 31 December of this year, after us forces withdrew from fighting under the Convention, towns, villages and townships of Iraq on June 30, 2009. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Editor: SS | BR
Monday 18 July, 2011 10: 15 GMT
Spokesman for the Iraqi list book Shaker
Sumerian news/Baghdad
The Iraqi list, confirmed Monday that there were awaiting the decision of the US troops to stay on Maliki lithmh to America or Iran, calling them "unpatriotic", inviting to take a position in favour of people and claim to leave without conditions.
And the Iraqi list spokesman statement book Shaker and Sumerian "received news", "copy of the National President of internship and waiting for the Government will take a decision on the extension of the presence of US troops in Iraq or not", pointing out that "the country's sovereignty and security of the citizen and the future of Iraq."
The book that "the Prime Minister is expected to agree to keep us lithmh to the Americans and that he has joint projects with them, and if US troops would stay, he had been subjected to pressure Iran but cooperate", stating that "no clear position on the existence or the departure of US troops from some strong concern and allow doubt the sincerity of the parties."
And through the book rejected "deal with it in the context of conflicts between the parties to the political process," to take a position in principle decided upon for the benefit of the people and homeland, claiming leave unconditionally and not to remain under any pretext. "
The book was "feared Iranian threats in the u.s. would fill the vacuum, it suffers from a permanent disability is the inability to look to the Iraqi people with vision and conscious and did not see the capabilities of the Iraqi national unity and readiness to defend the country, particularly the Iraqis ' considerable experience in dealing with the occupiers and their agents", wondering "is that the continued presence of US troops will be based on a occupation troops or forces attribution?, if intended to be attribution question would be underpinned against whom?".
The book drew from this altarigat the Iraqi Government that was intended to do is request that US forces will cover all costs for the survival of American forces at the expense of the Iraqi people and the State funds, "he said, adding that" US forces authorization to defend itself will continue killing Iraqi citizens indiscriminately, with the same random methods, which will contribute to the American attribution forces raids and arrests in the so-called fight against terrorism on the basis of what brings detective. "
The spokesman for the Iraqi list, "the US forces would be blatant interference in our internal affairs, and specifically in the policies and positions of the Iraqi Government through its advisers and associates", but "as for us party's claim that there is an urgent need for the survival of sufficient forces to protect its Embassy in Iraq, we react to protect foreign embassies is the duty of the host State, but not the State of the Embassy itself, which confine protection procedures inside the Embassy itself."
A book saying "if we can find from the vacuum feared the withdrawal of US forces, which has leaves to infiltrate the Iranian public, honoured zahwa we respond to them that the alternative to all this is the true national project, which is based on national unity, which is based on the common defence of all our political and our sectors of our lands and address common to build a modern democratic State."
Oscillating Iraqi political remarks on survival of part of the US forces in the country after 2011, between acceptance and rejection or acceptance of the timid, with load some other blocks blocks responsible for decision-making, considering the State of law coalition leader Hassan Al-Sunaid, on 19 June last, the survival or withdrawal of US troops from Iraq was not yet Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, but nevertheless, the Council of Ministers of the political blocs, inviting the latter to take a unified stance towards the subject, State Coalition MP Walid law Ornaments, in the last 25 June, that Iraq needed to keep us forces to protect its airspace and symbolic Kirkuk and other areas subject to the approval of the House.
In contrast, their comrades last June 28, he would reject any decision by Parliament concerning the extension of US forces in Iraq, while the PUK leader, Adnan Mufti US forces should remain in Iraq beyond the end of the year 2011, on the basis that the State of Iraq is still not integrated, and that a large majority of political parties recognize and support the survival of these forces.
The head of the Iraqi House of Osama in 23 June alngivi past, the survival of US forces in Iraq is subject to the agreement of the political blocs, according to a Government request.
And Iraq and the United States, during 2008, the strategic framework agreement to support Iraqi ministries and agencies in the transition from strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic and diplomatic, cultural and security, based on reducing the number of provincial reconstruction teams, as well as providing a sustainable rule of law, including the police development programme and the coordination and supervision and report for the Fund of the Iraq relief and reconstruction.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington at the end of November 2008 must withdraw all u.s. forces from all the lands and waters and airspace of Iraq not later than 31 December of this year, after us forces withdrew from fighting under the Convention, towns, villages and townships of Iraq on June 30, 2009. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
