Home
The report of the Office of Financial Supervision (41)
2.7.2013 | (Voice of Iraq)
Report BSA (41)
Baghdad / term
* surplus about $ 4 trillion dinars of the amounts allocated to balance the ongoing ministries because of not being able to exchange amounts allocated to them got "long" on the full text of the report BSA in 2011, which will be presented to the reader surprises not through countless episodes. The Bureau of the oldest institutions of the Iraqi state which distributes copies limited each winter for its annual report on fiscal spending witnessed all government departments during the previous year. In this report, a unique advantages, the first being that it reveals information level disaster Diary state departments all, a show into the open for the first once being displayed legal language and professional audit and review meet and comparisons include previous years. second advantage that he did not issue against the ruling party, or against another block, but his books crew staff and find wide acceptance, and respected by the Prime Minister himself. The third advantage is that the BSA can through his powers of that up is documented to most of the information can not reporting accessible with this access right to him in a democratic system, but is deprived of access to this information to Parliament. Said the annual report to the Cabinet and also will notice Reader, involves substantial explicitly, it serves as a senior Iraqi recognition of the absence of the state in the terrifying details led us to these poor conditions. The state, through this report, recognizes that inside large areas of "non-state", and these spaces begin Circuits serious such as the Council of Ministers, does not end when the smallest village, as seen Followers of these episodes. we will discover successively that we have the full story of the Iraqi state in 2011, or "The Story of non-state in Iraq," if you will. Chapter III (financial analysis units central funding and self) This chapter also review the results of the financial analysis conducted by this Court on the financial statements for units central funding and self-issued during the year / 2011 opinion positive until 18/6 / 2012. financial statements for units of government funding for fiscal year 2010 and issued its accounts for the period from 01/01/2011 until 18/06/2012 , as in Table (1) first - Results of financial analysis for the units to finance the government showed the financial analysis of the financial statements for the financial year / 2010 units of government funding and issued statements during the period from 1/1/2011 until 18/06/2012 several indicators on the financial performance of the ministries and its formations, and are listed below leading indicators: 1 - The amounts allocated to the current budget for government financing units / year 2010 amounted to ( 20,295,766) million dinars (twenty trillion two hundred and fifty thousand and ninety-five billion and seven hundred and sixty-six million dinars). 2 - The disbursements of the budget going in the light of the results of the financial analysis for the units of government funding for the year / 2010 amounted to (16,545,533) million dinars (sixteen trillion five hundred and forty-five billion, five hundred and thirty-three million) and accounted for (81.5%) of the amounts allocated. 3 - Table listed below economic classification of expenditures. amounts / MTD as in Table (2) and The above table show the following: a - a surplus of $ (3750233) million dinars (three trillion seven hundred and fifty billion, two hundred and thirty-three million dinars) because of the inability of the departments of the exchange amounts allocated to them, which requires more accuracy when developing customizations Annual and proper planning in the development of customizations to help proper exploitation in other areas, as well as not to be exploited amounts disbursed for expenditure sections in the conduct of transfers. b - formed compensation of employees the highest spending of the total amount spent, where it formed allocations earmarked her percentage (48.60 %) of the total allocations while disbursements accounted for the compensation of employees (52.36%) of the total disbursements, and the rest (47.64%) of the disbursements have been spent on the rest of the doors (of intermediate goods, the required service, maintenance of assets, other miscellaneous expenses, non-financial assets, manufacturing expenses, benefits, subsidies, social benefits). c - formed manufacturing expenses lower proportion of the total expenditure amount spent, where it formed allocations earmarked ratio (1.03%) of the total allocations while disbursements accounted for expenses manufacturing ratio (1.18%) of the total disbursements. and Figure (1) shows the percentage contribution paragraphs spending allocated as in Figure (3) 4 - the annual allocations for units of government funding for the year 2010 at the level of each ministry by economic classification of expenditures As shown in the table below (amounts / million): - as in the table (4-5) * results of the analysis of financial units of government funding does not include public companies self-financing and investment budget. * not include disclosure above formations of the Ministry of Environment where not issued final accounts until the date of the preparation of the report. * received accounts Bureau chip financial within departments belonging to the formations House of Representatives, and was paragraphs customizations (b million) as follows: compensation of employees (46,419), intermediate goods (1417), the required service (17,344), maintenance Assets (1025), assets other than financial (4779), expenditure manufacturing (59). 5 - disbursements by classifications of economic and administrative expenses, as shown in the table below (amounts / million): - as in the table (6-7) * received accounts BSA within departments belonging to the formations House of Representatives, and was paragraphs expenses (b million) as follows: compensation of employees (31,467), intermediate goods (1040), the required service (11 615), maintenance of assets (705), assets non-financial (2154), expenditure manufacturing (59). 6 - execution rates current budget: A comparison results of the implementation current budget (expense actual / LCA) to units of government funding for the year 2010 the following indicators: - A - ranged implementing the current budget of the ministries and formations between (42 , 8% -96.1%) has been observed considerable variation in the rates of implementation, reaching rates of implementation and the Ministry of Finance (42.8%) while the proportion in the Ministry of Displacement and Migration (96.1%). b - when the results of the implementation of the budget tab in a graph based on the rate of implementation of the ministries at each ratio observed the following: first - did not record any of the Ministry of execution rates less than 40%. Secondly - there (3) Ministries of (31) and the Ministry reached proportions implemented more than 40%, which is attributed low has accounted for (9.7) of the total ministries. Thirdly - recorded (28) and the Ministry of origin (31) and the Ministry of execution rates ranging between (more than 50% - more than 90%) is acceptable ratios represent the proportion (90.3%) of the total ministries which shows high rates of implementation in most ministries. table and graph below illustrate the numbers of ministries when the execution rate. as in Figure (
graph of the number of ministries disaggregated rates of implementation. The table below shows the rates of implementation at the level of each ministry as in Table (9 and 10) and Chart (3) shows rates of implementation at the level of each ministry. as in Figure (11) execution rates current budget 2010 c - formed ratios contribution budget expenditures by types to total expenses for a number of ministries and formations The following indicators: first - paragraph Salaries: compensation of employees ranged to my total expenses (0.5 to 92.5) and total average compensation of employees (52.4) of the total expenses of the current budget and this represents somewhat high proportion to total budget expenditures which requires ongoing study. II - paragraph supplies the commodity: low rates of intermediate goods ranging from (0 to 25.0) The total percentage (4.4) of the total expenses, suggesting excessive customizations or lack of precision in estimates . III - paragraph supplies the service: the required service ranged between (0.2 to 44) The total percentage (4.2) of the total expenses which indicates that the expenditure on the total required service slim toward the rest of the expenses and the consequent lack of precision in the customizations or non-implementation of the services monitored by allocations of these ministries, in addition to the non-observance of the scientific foundations in the implementation of the budget. The table below shows the percentage contribution types of expenses to total expenses. ratios contribution budget expenditures by types as in Table No. (12 and 13) 7 - the results of implementing revenue showed comparable results of the implementation revenue (TTM actual / TTM Evaluator) to units of government funding (which is in the nature dominant units is Aiardih) for the year 2010 the following indicators: - A - ranged denies revenue to the ministries and formations between (44.4% -25,475%) has been observed large variation in the rates of implementation where the percentage of implementation of the Ministry of Human Rights (44.4) in the While the figure was at the Ministry of Industry and Minerals (25 475%). b - did not show the amounts المخمنة ministries and formations following (the presidency, youth and sports, trade, oil, electricity, science and technology, communications) was zero, which can not be calculated rates of implementation and this indicates weakness those ministries in estimating revenues. c - came implementation rate is high in most of the ministries and to the fact that some departments did not include amounts Almkhmna has included the actual amounts, which led to high rates of Altniv For example, the Ministry of Industry, where he was Evaluator zero and actual (1012) million dinars (one billion and twelve ten million dinars). The table below shows the execution rates of income at the level of each ministry as in Table (14)[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
