Home
Federal Court appeal is contained in the replacement of members of Parliament Act emphasizes not to prejudice the separation of powers
4/14/2015
{Baghdad: Euphrates News} Federal Court received, on Tuesday, challenging the replacement of members of the House of Representatives, while confirming that the response of appeal does not mean the separation of the three powers.
The spokesman said the Supreme Judicial Council spokesman Abdul Sattar Bayraktar told {Euphrates News} today, "there was a call in front of the Federal Court, on an appeal in the Law No. {6} for the year 2006, the replacement of members of the House bill," adding that "the court Federal received the appeal, and he was in his decision that this law is one of the laws that did not entail the effects of material does not constitute a violation of the public policy of the state does not affect the judiciary functions and characteristics. "
He added: "Therefore, Talharia who came by the house directly, is the practice of the competence of the vote stipulated in Article {61} First, in the Constitution, based on Article {46 Fifth him}, the Court of the Federal not return from the previous its principle, but that the fact that the law has not impinge not the effects of material he has legislative power in their mission came under the constitution and it Mansous materials {61} {46 and Article V of it}. "
He noted that "some satellite channels and media published news includes that the Federal Court returned for its principle," stressing that "the Federal Court would not retreat from its principle, but this law is not the effects of material and therefore there is no prejudice to the issue of the separation of powers" .anthy and
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
4/14/2015
{Baghdad: Euphrates News} Federal Court received, on Tuesday, challenging the replacement of members of the House of Representatives, while confirming that the response of appeal does not mean the separation of the three powers.
The spokesman said the Supreme Judicial Council spokesman Abdul Sattar Bayraktar told {Euphrates News} today, "there was a call in front of the Federal Court, on an appeal in the Law No. {6} for the year 2006, the replacement of members of the House bill," adding that "the court Federal received the appeal, and he was in his decision that this law is one of the laws that did not entail the effects of material does not constitute a violation of the public policy of the state does not affect the judiciary functions and characteristics. "
He added: "Therefore, Talharia who came by the house directly, is the practice of the competence of the vote stipulated in Article {61} First, in the Constitution, based on Article {46 Fifth him}, the Court of the Federal not return from the previous its principle, but that the fact that the law has not impinge not the effects of material he has legislative power in their mission came under the constitution and it Mansous materials {61} {46 and Article V of it}. "
He noted that "some satellite channels and media published news includes that the Federal Court returned for its principle," stressing that "the Federal Court would not retreat from its principle, but this law is not the effects of material and therefore there is no prejudice to the issue of the separation of powers" .anthy and
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
