Home
Federal Court emphasizes that pass the law requires two-thirds of the members of parliament vote
4/30/2015
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the vote on the law must be two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives, the terms and the law in general, pointing out that going to mean another interpretation of the constitutional text empty of content.
A spokesman for the federal judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar, in a statement received by the agency all of Iraq [where] a copy of "The House of Representatives sent an explanatory request to the Federal Supreme Court about the vote on the law mechanism," noting that "the vote and under interpretation should be two-thirds House members on the provisions of the law, and the law in general, too. "
He pointed out that "the court found that going to another interpretation, means emptying the constitutional text and exceeded and to maintain the provisions of the rules of procedure it."
He stressed interpretation according to Bayrakdar on "privacy provisions of the Federal Supreme Court and in view of what represented as the highest judicial body in the justice of peace, and the judiciary of the Federal given its constitutional competence and which extends to the regions and governorates not organized province, all under Article 92 / I of the Constitution]. "
it intends to House of Representatives approval of the draft of the Federal Court Act during the current legislative term, which has been extended Today the thirty Aoma.anthy
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
4/30/2015
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the vote on the law must be two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives, the terms and the law in general, pointing out that going to mean another interpretation of the constitutional text empty of content.
A spokesman for the federal judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar, in a statement received by the agency all of Iraq [where] a copy of "The House of Representatives sent an explanatory request to the Federal Supreme Court about the vote on the law mechanism," noting that "the vote and under interpretation should be two-thirds House members on the provisions of the law, and the law in general, too. "
He pointed out that "the court found that going to another interpretation, means emptying the constitutional text and exceeded and to maintain the provisions of the rules of procedure it."
He stressed interpretation according to Bayrakdar on "privacy provisions of the Federal Supreme Court and in view of what represented as the highest judicial body in the justice of peace, and the judiciary of the Federal given its constitutional competence and which extends to the regions and governorates not organized province, all under Article 92 / I of the Constitution]. "
it intends to House of Representatives approval of the draft of the Federal Court Act during the current legislative term, which has been extended Today the thirty Aoma.anthy
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
