Home
(The victory of the negotiations) with the outside work and relapse at home
On: Sat 3/12/2011 9:34
political analysis / flood Majid
A visit by U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden sudden many of the reactions, although the visit resulted in the confirmation from the U.S. side abide by the terms of withdrawal according to the agreement concluded with the Iraqi side and perhaps interesting to note that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki
Description of the event that (a victory for the negotiations) and this demonstrates that the Iraqi side has the spirit and the mechanism of dialogue and negotiation which has the capacity to deal with a superpower like the United States, but surprising that the Iraqis are winning in their negotiations with the other, but when the dialogue between them, they get to failure and infertility? What are the reasons for the failure of internal dialogue, which I think is more important than any dialogue else? Will the victory came the negotiations with the U.S. side for a political consensus is the result of internal and external pressure? In spite of the comments stating that the withdrawal complete and there is no other commitments in this direction, but some parties in the government said words may be interpreted that to stay the U.S. will take another form through the presence of experts and trainers within the staffing of the U.S. embassy and this can be included within the terms of the framework strategy. May open up talent our politicians when the other party to the dialogue is not an Iraqi, but if the Iraqis, all turns will be present, and all horizons are blocked, and the remaining solutions beyond the reach of the hand, a dominant feature of most of the dialogues that took place between the political parties and over eight years, The question is when can it win or will be part of our negotiations we know as political _ that the political process did not comply with the Constitution and the rule is now consensus - not up to politicians dialogues solutions?! Observer for the development of the country's internal signal that we are suffering a crisis a real dialogue, and because of the absence of intent first, and the lack of confidence among the parties of the political process, Second, and perhaps the interesting thing is that Iraq's external relations look good and well, while there is a situation of chaos between the limbs of Interior, sometimes amounting to might be called the after the break, and during the last period did not touch the citizen or the observer state of a positive signal that could lead to putting an end to this chaos of political, which is dominated in turn on the overall other sectors, whether political or economic or security, and the Iraqi situation is always in the lead straight economic terms of the paradoxes, can not find a political system to achieve a victory externally - even at the level of dialogue - while he is suffering internal crises have the first and not her last, and al-Qaeda political axiom says that countries that enjoy political system is stable and homogeneous are victorious, and in the case of Iraq the situation seems upside down upside down down, and can not be any stock in the world to put the rules of the game of Iraqi politics, it is always abnormal and outside historical contexts, the more gets. in progress time forward back the political process to the back, and, worryingly, this is caused by the political elites failed in its dialogue and the privilege , and this is reason for surprise and confusion, negotiations Iraqi / Iraqi tend to create a node always, sailing reverse currents and violent as Astmrot this game, as if their existence is coupled with the defeat of her interviews, so the refraction and relapse are the dominant feature of the day. Does not appear to the observer that there is a space of generosity prevails among the participants is to govern in Iraq, but the overriding militancy is clear and the lack of flexibility in the dialogues and negotiations, which is often doomed to failure unfair. Win when our conversations are internal and the level of dialogue with the American side or the other? And when to give up their control of the ruling elites in favor of partial rights of the nation as a whole? Perhaps we have to wait a dialogue externally new to see that we were going to win it too, or is it that our victory will be limited to the U.S. withdrawal from the country, a maturity imposed the people did not make it the politicians who, according to their current will not win anything, as far as they go always to create a crisis because their presence associated with them.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
